B 25 (1 Viewer)

amhuff1

Sergeant
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
691
I saw a Figarti B 25 at the show in Hackensack at Hobby Bunker's tables. I wanted to buy one but the wings did not look right. Did anyone else notice this? I was just wondering because all of the B25s in photos and the ones I ve seen in person are different than the Figarti version. The wings after the engines slope or droop down so the wing tips are lower at the end. All of the photos and real planes Ive seen have the wings going out straight. I wanted one of these because the museum here in Reading has a B25 that flies but the wings do not look right. I thought maybe the Doolittle planes had been modified? but all the pictures Ive seen show the wings going out even. Any thoughts?
 
That was from the Chicago Show. Figarti was planning to go back and fix some of the things in the plane, including this presumably. The plane is supposed to be available by Christmas.

Brad
 
I saw a Figarti B 25 at the show in Hackensack at Hobby Bunker's tables. I wanted to buy one but the wings did not look right. Did anyone else notice this? I was just wondering because all of the B25s in photos and the ones I ve seen in person are different than the Figarti version. The wings after the engines slope or droop down so the wing tips are lower at the end. All of the photos and real planes Ive seen have the wings going out straight. I wanted one of these because the museum here in Reading has a B25 that flies but the wings do not look right. I thought maybe the Doolittle planes had been modified? but all the pictures Ive seen show the wings going out even. Any thoughts?

I'm sure that you're familiar with the aesthetics of a "gull-wing" on an aircraft like a Corsair or even a Stuka. A major consideration in the design of those wings was an interest in shortening the landing-struts, so as to reduce the stress on the assemblies while maintaining adequate clearance for the propeller.

Now, let's invert the "bent-wing," as was done on the A-20 and B-25. In both cases, the inner-part of the wing, extending out to the engine nacelle, is angled aggressively upward. In both instances, this was done to make room for the landing-gear beneath their respective nacelles, so as to provide adequate ground-clearance for the fuselage. However, in the case of the Mitchell, the outer section of the wing is then angled slightly downward from the horizontal, creating a degree of negative dihedral. This is more noticeable on the ground than in the air, BTW, because the wing possesses a degree of flexibility. When there's no air-flow to support it, the wing will sag a bit.

Sorry if I told you more than you want to know about the wings... ;)

About the model...

I noticed the wings on the Figarti B-25 also. From looking at the photos, it appears as though they got the dihedral of the inner-wing wrong. It's too flat coming out of its root with the fuselage. In other words, the wing needs to be angled upward at that point. Were that accomplished, the outer-wing is likely spot-on. This won't necessarily be easy to accomplish, but I hope that Figarti can make the adjustment. It really is a nice "little" model.

-Moe
 
I was fortunate enough to purchase a Die-cast Armour 1:48 scale B-25 (Ruptured Duck) before Armour went out of business....Excellent detail at affordable prices:salute::.....Wish they were still making these fine planes.
 
I think Vezzolf is right about the wing. If they fix the inner wing, the outer wing will look correct in head-on profile.

I thought maybe the Doolittle planes had been modified? but all the pictures Ive seen show the wings going out even.

The B-25's Doolittle used were B-25B's, and they were modified, but no modification had any impact on the wings' dihedral. In fact, the only changes that were noticeable externally were removing the Bendix ventral turret, which was sighted via a periscope by the gunner sitting above and slightly forward of it; and the addition of broomsticks attached to the observation blister at the end of the tail, to give the impression of machine guns. Otherwise, they were identical to other 'B's.

The belly turret was the same turret used on the B-17E. It was discontinued primarily because gunners suffered from dizziness and even vertigo, trying to use the series of mirrors that made of the sight. On the Doolittle raiders, the space provided storage for extra cans of fuel. On the B-17E, the Bendix turret was replaced by Sperry's ball turret.

Prost!
Brad
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top