Buttoned-Up Tanks?? (1 Viewer)

Warbuff26

Sergeant
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
665
What are all of your thoughts on getting a tank or two that was buttoned-up? No hatches open....no figures? I for one would welcome this. I have the Iwo Jima Sherman and it is buttoned-up. I saw the the Dak Panzer IV and it has 5 guys sticking out of it......hard to use it in a battle scene.

Plus...there has been a lot of talk about price recently...buttoned-up with no figures should be easier on the wallets! :rolleyes:

Thoughts?
 
What are all of your thoughts on getting a tank or two that was buttoned-up? No hatches open....no figures? I for one would welcome this. I have the Iwo Jima Sherman and it is buttoned-up. I saw the the Dak Panzer IV and it has 5 guys sticking out of it......hard to use it in a battle scene.

Plus...there has been a lot of talk about price recently...buttoned-up with no figures should be easier on the wallets! :rolleyes:

Thoughts?
King&Country did tanks with hatches that could be open or closed for a while.
Maybe they could be encouraged to do it again! Eh!
 
Sounds like a good suggestion- I also have heard suggestions from other collectors looking for "Hull Down" tigers and such- much like the Iraqi Hull Down T72 from the SF Line.
 
Sounds like a good suggestion- I also have heard suggestions from other collectors looking for "Hull Down" tigers and such- much like the Iraqi Hull Down T72 from the SF Line.
:D BULLY GOOD IDEA!!!!
Both sides used hulldown tanks. It might eeven be easier to produce and maybe cost less!!!!!!!!!?????????:D:D
O.C.
 
Sounds like a good suggestion- I also have heard suggestions from other collectors looking for "Hull Down" tigers and such- much like the Iraqi Hull Down T72 from the SF Line.

No good CC. You can't realistically push them across your desk top going:
"Brrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm........Kapow! :)

That said, if we can't have tanks with hatches down, seperate tankers in 1/4 figure size, including commanders, would give us some 'action' options.

Simon
 
No good CC. You can't realistically push them across your desk top going:
"Brrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm........Kapow! :)

That said, if we can't have tanks with hatches down, seperate tankers in 1/4 figure size, including commanders, would give us some 'action' options.

Simon
NO?
but you can rock them back slightly going...P-FUMP..P-FUMP..!!:D
 
Thats a good idea Brian. I would like to see this and the part of saving money is really good.
 
Personally I think it's the figures that bring the tank to life.........
 
No good CC. You can't realistically push them across your desk top going:
"Brrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm........Kapow! :)

That said, if we can't have tanks with hatches down, seperate tankers in 1/4 figure size, including commanders, would give us some 'action' options.

Simon

Sure you can- just cutoff the wheels of a dalek and glue them to the bottom :D

I have heard a lot of guys mention the "tanker action pose"- what exactly would you want?? I think of all the things that KC does "right", it's the tank crews and their actions. Truthfully, with the exception of the commander squeezing off some rounds off the top gun what else is there? In combat, those things are buttoned down TIGHT and if they aren't then the hatches are combat locked open and the crew is still taking refuge in the belly of the beast.
 
Sure you can- just cutoff the wheels of a dalek and glue them to the bottom :D

I have heard a lot of guys mention the "tanker action pose"- what exactly would you want?? I think of all the things that KC does "right", it's the tank crews and their actions. Truthfully, with the exception of the commander squeezing off some rounds off the top gun what else is there? In combat, those things are buttoned down TIGHT and if they aren't then the hatches are combat locked open and the crew is still taking refuge in the belly of the beast.

'Kapow' / 'Exterminate'
OK, I'll buy that :D

I think it would be great if the hatches were hinged so they could be displayed either open or closed, but I don't know how possible this is without ruining the aesthetics of the tank, or without making them vulnerable to damage in transit.

But, with what we've got, i.e. loads of open hatches, any dio / scene that we are trying to present as being remotely action like (and there are of course numerous figure sets to support this), leaves us with the dilema of having a tank crew fully exposed drinking coffee, reading maps etc, from their hartches, or leaving the tank figures out all together, but still having a tank rolling forward in to combat with hatches open.
If we had a generic set of tankers, who were 'cut off' a little lower, so that perhaps you might get just the head and tops of shoulders showing, the piece may blend in and match the figures surrounding it.

Fully appreciate what you say about the realities of being completely sealed in, but none of the relases we have at present accomodate this, without some major reworking with a 9" angle grinder :eek:

Hope that better explains what I meant.

Oh, and another .50 cal shooter as in the DD45 Sherman would be cool as well. Maybe resembling, oh, I don't know, Clint Eastwood? With an eccentric, bearded hippy tank commander in flying helmet? :rolleyes:

Simon
 
No good CC. You can't realistically push them across your desk top going:
"Brrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm........Kapow! :)

That said, if we can't have tanks with hatches down, seperate tankers in 1/4 figure size, including commanders, would give us some 'action' options.

Simon

Glad its not just me then mate!;):D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top