Hello,
To Brad , no I was not angry for what you said
I thank you for the web site . I knew him but I never went through the main page because i beleived It was paying . This afternoon ,I went on it and I discovered a lot of pages : many hours ot delightfull reading.
To Combat , I don't think we can consider that french ordonnance flags are the boundaries of the regiment. they were two at the times of fort Carillon ( I prefer this name because it sounds at our ears because a "carillon" is a group of bells)but no long before the regumlation they were three and in 1720 when the companies were àf 100 men ,there was a flag in each company , so a regiment could have 14-18 flags for the whole.
In Montcalm's times , the companies have been reduced to 50-40 men and the flags also reduced in number.
French ordonnance flags have three main uses : first of all they are the name of the regiment ,clearly visible ( each regiment has his pattern and colors =paints), besides ,they are the mark of the physical presence of the regiment at this spot , but the two flags are not placed at each corner of it but in the middle of the center companies where there is the most number of men waiting to protect them. Third the flag is a constant sign of rally for the men of the regiment during the battle :we don't forget all the smoke dued to musketry , that why the flags of thesse times are of so great dimensions.
There is one point which annoys me; I saw the picture in the Osprey book upon Ticonderoga and I wonder why Moncalm as commander in chief and so representative of the king has not a white flag as he ought to have.
Best regards for everybody
Thierry