Execution by Cannon (1 Viewer)

PolarBear

Major
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
6,706
In my current exploration of the British in India in the 19th C I came across references to the use of cannons by British troops for the execution of Indian rebels. From what I can tell this first took place in the Indian Mutiny of 1857. The story appeared at the time in The Illustrated London News and was later re-told in the U.S. in the February 15, 1862 issue of Harper's Weekly.

Here is the text from Harper's and the illustration that they reproduced from the ILN:


THE BRITISH METHODS IN WAR.

WE republish on this page, from the London Illustrated Times, an illustration which appeared in that journal in the year 1857, representing THE BLOWING OF SEPOY PRISONERS OF WAR FROM THE MOUTH OF CANNON. The circumstances of the case bear some analogy to those which are recurring
at the present time in our Southern States. The natives of British India, whose grounds of discontent with their Government, unlike those of the Southern rebels, were substantial and grievous, rose in arms to strike for their freedom. The British Government, at first unsuccessful in its struggles with the rebellion, at length gathered up its energies and put them down. How it dealt with
the prisoners of war taken in fight our illustration shows. The following extracts from British journals contain the narrative of a couple of executions :
A late mail from India brought accounts of two such executions. On 12th June, at Pashawar, forty men were tried, convicted, and sentenced to be blown from the guns. The execution was a dreadful sight. Three sides of a square were formed by British troops, and in the centre ten
guns were planted, pointing outward. In dead silence the decree of the court was read, and this ceremony concluded, a prisoner was bound to each gun-his back placed against the muzzle, and his arms fastened firmly to the wheels. The signal is now given, and the salvo fired. The discharge, of course, cuts the body in two; and human trunks, heads, legs, and arms may be seen for an instant flying about in all directions. As there were only ten guns used on this occasion, the mutilated remains had to be removed four times. All of these forty criminals met their fate with firmness, with the exception of two; and to save time, they were dropped to the ground, and their brains blown out by musketry.
Another execution of a similar nature took place on the 13th of June, at Ferozepore. All the available troops and public establishments were convened to witness the scene. Some of the mutineers were to be hung, and around the gallows, erected during the night previous, the soldiers were drawn up. The mutineers were then brought into the centre, and the proceedings of the general Court-Martial was read. Upon being informed that if they would become Queen's evidence they would be reprieved, twelve of the criminals accepted the offer and were marched to the rear. Two were taken to the gallows. They ascended the ladder with firm steps, and to the last moment betrayed no emotion of fear.
The remaining ten were now led away to the artillery guns, and while their irons were being struck off some cried, "Do not sacrifice the innocent for the guilty!" Two others rejoined, "Hold your sniveling: die men and not cowards—you defended your religion, why then do you crave your lives? Sahibs! they are not Sahibs, they are dogs!" Others then began to upbraid their commanding officer. The wretched beings were quickly fastened to the muzzles of ten guns, charged with blank cartridge. The commanding officer directed port-fires to be lit. "Ready!" "Fire!" and the drama was played out. An eye-witness says: "The scene and stench were overpowering. I felt myself terribly convulsed, and could observe that the numerous native spectators were awe-stricken—that they not only trembled like aspen-leaves, but also changed into unnatural hues. Precaution was not taken to remove the sponge-and-load men from the muzzles of the guns; the consequence was that they were greatly bespattered with blood, and one man in particular received a stunning blow from a shivered arm!"
 

Attachments

  • britishatrocitiesindia.jpg
    britishatrocitiesindia.jpg
    82.4 KB · Views: 15,542
The next instance of this seems to have occurred in the 1870s in response to the Kuka Movement of the Sikhs described below. I illustrate this with a color printed postcard from that time period.

During their brief span, the Kukas had thrice revolted against the British. The first such attempt was made as early as in 1869 when a number of Kukas belonging to Ferozepur and Sirsa attacked the Deputy Inspector Dewan Baksh alongwith his constable Soobe Singh, snatched their weapons and wounded them.
The second episode occurred when in response to challenge given by the government by way of sacrilege of the Sikh religious places, the Kukas attacked the slaughterhouses at Amritsar and Raikot in June 1871. They freed the cows by murdering the butchers and fled away. The real perpetrators could not be traced and the blame of the act was put on 12 innocent Hindus and Sikhs by forced confessions these confessions were supported by false evidence extracted from these 12 people leading to the capital punishment of the lower court. The Kukas acting on the advice of their Guru surrendered and proved themselves guilty by producing the weapons thus exposing and eroding the faith of many on the British legal system. Four Kukas in this case were executed in September 1871 with a Banyan tree at Rambagh hanged and some others were sentenced to long term imprisonment.
The treatment meted out to the Kukas by the Government did not subdue them. In spite of the restriction imposed on Guru Ram Singh, Kukas gathered at Bhaini on the Maghi festival in January, 1872. One group decided to attack Malerkotla against the advice of the Guru. 68 Kukas were captured of which 66 were blown after tying them to the cannons. Subsequently another 16 Kukas were blasted at Malerkotla and four were sentenced to life imprisonment. Kukas headquarters at Bhaini was also searched. Nothing much of consequence was found except few kirpans, latchets and some ornamental Khukaris. Guru Ram Singh and eleven of his follower were deported to Rangoon. Ram Singh died in Rangoon in 1885.
 

Attachments

  • shotfromcannons.jpg
    shotfromcannons.jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 9,393
The execution was a dreadful sight. Three sides of a square were formed by British troops, and in the centre ten
guns were planted, pointing outward. In dead silence the decree of the court was read, and this ceremony concluded, a prisoner was bound to each gun-his back placed against the muzzle, and his arms fastened firmly to the wheels. The signal is now given, and the salvo fired. The discharge, of course, cuts the body in two; and human trunks, heads, legs, and arms may be seen for an instant flying about in all directions. As there were only ten guns used on this occasion, the mutilated remains had to be removed four times. All of these forty criminals met their fate with firmness, with the exception of two; and to save time, they were dropped to the ground, and their brains blown out by musketry.

Simply brutal :(
 
Simply brutal :(
It would seem that Harper's Weekly in publishing this during the Civil War was implying a parallel to atrocities committed by the South. I had never heard of these atrocities before and ran across this information while going through images of 19th C India.
 
Now that seems unduly grotesque, not to mention messy. I wonder who thought that would be a useful punishment and why?
 
Hey guys I don’t want to offend / disrespect nobody or attack nobody feelings.. But I always found weird when people used some terminology.

In this special case:

What is the difference to be killed by a riffle squadron with small caliber or a canon….? The bullet size, n’est-ce pas?

The same when people use the term Rules of the WAR. For me a WAR has no rules, you kill somebody or somebody will kill you.

Other people say; the reason I collect Afrika Korps is because it was a war of no human disasters just military. IMO what ever you collect related to NAZI GERMAN is related to human catastrophe it doesn’t matter in which front was.

Don’t be mad with me….it is just an opinion.:eek:
 
Hey guys I don’t want to offend / disrespect nobody or attack nobody feelings.. But I always found weird when people used some terminology.

In this special case:

What is the difference to be killed by a riffle squadron with small caliber or a canon….? The bullet size, n’est-ce pas?

The same when people use the term Rules of the WAR. For me a WAR has no rules, you kill somebody or somebody will kill you.

Other people say; the reason I collect Afrika Korps is because it was a war of no human disasters just military. IMO what ever you collect related to NAZI GERMAN is related to human catastrophe it doesn’t matter in which front was.

Don’t be mad with me….it is just an opinion.:eek:

Rod,i guess the main difference is the perceived 'clean' death from the firing squad compared to the gruesome death of being blown into pieces,with limbs and head going in all directions.It must have been an instant death but the fear beforehand must have been awful.Death is death however we look at it,but many think we can execute people in a humane way,but thats a WHOLE different argument.;)

I also agree with you re the Afrika Corps.I can fully appreciate the military genius of Rommel,as a military leader one of the finest in History.But as a human being he represented the biggest collection of scum ever put together.So we have to remember that although he himself did not commit atrocities his beloved leader instigated some of the worst in History.We should when studying,collecting or for those reinacting remember just who these people were,how bad they were and just how important it was they were wiped from the face of the earth.

Rob
 
Now that seems unduly grotesque, not to mention messy. I wonder who thought that would be a useful punishment and why?

You know,much as i'm a very proud Brit,its hard defending the aforementioned Empire on this one!:eek:.Truly hideous practice.

Rob
 
You know,much as i'm a very proud Brit,its hard defending the aforementioned Empire on this one!:eek:.Truly hideous practice.

Rob

Every nation at war has committed atrocities of one form or another. Events such as this are a reflection of the insanity and hatred that accompany any conflict.
 
Every nation at war has committed atrocities of one form or another. Events such as this are a reflection of the insanity and hatred that accompany any conflict.

Very well said.Sad but true.

Rob
 
Two quick points:

I largely agree with you Rod - you're dead, you're dead, not sure it matters what got ya. Things like combat shotguns being banned in the ETO during WW2 because of their "barbaric nature" always mystified me (they were used against the Japanese however). As if death by artillery or hand grenade was less barbaric than death by shotgun. BUT one important point here I think, in terms of what we view as a grotesque death, is the traditional Christian/Western view of life after death. The body is supposed to rise again, that's why we bury it, so to have it blown apart would suggest that individual would have a harder time resurrecting. As a Christian myself I really doubt it matters (what about all the good people who die in fires?), but on a subconscious level it still affects our view about what is a good, or bad death.

Second point: Rob I agree you can't entirely separate the regular German army from the crimes that went on behind the scenes (in some sense one allowed the other to happen), however I would not say Hitler was Rommel's "beloved" leader. Rommel was in on the plot to kill the man - and lost his life because of it. That's partly why around the world he's thought of today as one of the "good Germans".
 
One point that must be remembered here, we are judging events that happened over 100 years ago by today's standards. That is not to excuse or justify what happened, but the Victorian set of values must be taken into account. The soldiers who emptied the well at Cawnpore of it's contents of butchered women and children must have been enraged beyond all control. To them the executions would have been viewed as fitting justice. They were fighting fire with fire. Today we pride ourselves on having more concern and compassion, but I can't help wondering how deep that veneer would be if a female member of a platoon was butchered in the same way. I think the lads would be out for revenge. As has already been said, war has a way of bringing out the best and the worst in people.
 
Two quick points:

I largely agree with you Rod - you're dead, you're dead, not sure it matters what got ya. Things like combat shotguns being banned in the ETO during WW2 because of their "barbaric nature" always mystified me (they were used against the Japanese however). As if death by artillery or hand grenade was less barbaric than death by shotgun. BUT one important point here I think, in terms of what we view as a grotesque death, is the traditional Christian/Western view of life after death. The body is supposed to rise again, that's why we bury it, so to have it blown apart would suggest that individual would have a harder time resurrecting. As a Christian myself I really doubt it matters (what about all the good people who die in fires?), but on a subconscious level it still affects our view about what is a good, or bad death.

Second point: Rob I agree you can't entirely separate the regular German army from the crimes that went on behind the scenes (in some sense one allowed the other to happen), however I would not say Hitler was Rommel's "beloved" leader. Rommel was in on the plot to kill the man - and lost his life because of it. That's partly why around the world he's thought of today as one of the "good Germans".

Hey CS,i thought that although Rommel knew of the plot he was not directly involved.Although i guess if he was that fond of Hitler he may well have spoken up.He obviously had no problem with Hitler during the early victorious years and also accepting medals and accolades.And its easy to just talk about mass murder as atrocities and forget that invading other nations and leading troops into those nations are also atrocities in themselves.I'm sure the good people of France for instance did not see Rommel as a heroic leader when he marched into their country.As i've said before i can admire military skill and genius in people from History from all nations,but we must remember who Rommel was actually fighting for and what a dark place it would have been if he had succeeded.Thats why despite all his faults and mistakes Monty is a hero,he beat Rommel and put the Nazis on the back foot,something which we should all be grateful for.

Rob
 
Let's not forget the Japanese, they probably killed more civilians then the Germans, and their treatment of prisoners of war was atrocious, Bushido hog wash code or not.

Of course, we have Dresden, Nagasaki and Hiroshima too. I suppose we can justify our sins because afterall, they started it.
 
One point that must be remembered here, we are judging events that happened over 100 years ago by today's standards. That is not to excuse or justify what happened, but the Victorian set of values must be taken into account. The soldiers who emptied the well at Cawnpore of it's contents of butchered women and children must have been enraged beyond all control. To them the executions would have been viewed as fitting justice. They were fighting fire with fire. Today we pride ourselves on having more concern and compassion, but I can't help wondering how deep that veneer would be if a female member of a platoon was butchered in the same way. I think the lads would be out for revenge. As has already been said, war has a way of bringing out the best and the worst in people.

One point that must be remembered here, we are judging events that happened over 100 years ago by today's standards.

800 BC in the Phoenician City of Biblos, a person who knows how to write & read was considered a Lethal Weapon… The big difference of today standards, is the ability of transmits the News, facts, images very fast throughout Mass Media communication vehicles, like Internet and live television.

We still doing bad things as we did in the Ancient and Medieval times, the only thing is that those things have to be hidden for the public opinion…because we are supposed to be civilized people.
 
One point that must be remembered here, we are judging events that happened over 100 years ago by today's standards. That is not to excuse or justify what happened, but the Victorian set of values must be taken into account. The soldiers who emptied the well at Cawnpore of it's contents of butchered women and children must have been enraged beyond all control. To them the executions would have been viewed as fitting justice. They were fighting fire with fire. Today we pride ourselves on having more concern and compassion, but I can't help wondering how deep that veneer would be if a female member of a platoon was butchered in the same way. I think the lads would be out for revenge. As has already been said, war has a way of bringing out the best and the worst in people.

I agree with everything in Trooper's post. To this day I cannot read the first hand accounts of what they found in Cawnpore without getting sick to my stomach. Frankly, if I had seen it in person, I hope I would have had the self control to court martial the culprits before executing them, and, as far as the means of execution, dead is dead. I suspect being blown from a gun is a faster and more merciful death than was given to the women and children at Cawnpore.
 
One point that must be remembered here, we are judging events that happened over 100 years ago by today's standards. That is not to excuse or justify what happened, but the Victorian set of values must be taken into account. The soldiers who emptied the well at Cawnpore of it's contents of butchered women and children must have been enraged beyond all control. To them the executions would have been viewed as fitting justice. They were fighting fire with fire. Today we pride ourselves on having more concern and compassion, but I can't help wondering how deep that veneer would be if a female member of a platoon was butchered in the same way. I think the lads would be out for revenge. As has already been said, war has a way of bringing out the best and the worst in people.
Perhaps mate but forgetting whatever atrocity was believed to justify it, that conduct would be barbaric in many prior centuries. The worst part of it is that is glorified the barbaric and was likely as disgusting to the soldiers that had to watch it (and clean it up:eek:) as it was to those it was likely supposed to punish or deter. As a punishment for the Cawnpore conduct cited, it was also too kind.
 
Every nation at war has committed atrocities of one form or another. Events such as this are a reflection of the insanity and hatred that accompany any conflict.


War has the uncanny ability to bring out the beast in the most civilised of peoples.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top