Currahee Chris
Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,776
Hey gang:
I am starting to crack the books on WW1- seen some more old time pics of my great grandfather the doughboy and it has picqued my interest.
Anyway, I am reading "World War 1" by noted historian SLA (Slam) Marshall. I was reading some of the information around Verdun and Falkenhayn's thoughts on the war in general. I just read on in absolute horror how he basically intended Verdun to be the last ditch battle by making it so bloody and costly that all the nations would capitulate and get it over. The amazing thing is that it sort of did the opposite. Sort of reminded me of the quote by Captain Miller (Tom Hanks) in SPR when he said "If I order one forward then I hope that is ten lives I just saved" but on a macro scale.
WW1 just boggles the mind- the numbers in men and material are just insane- I was reading about 132 French and British divisions engaged in battle- 132!!! It just boggles the mind. Plus the spent shells and other logistics.
I read "Why nations go to war" my freshman year in college and it touched on some of the circumstances surrounding the collision in 1914. It just seems like such a failure in terms of civilian leadership and diplomacy. Couple that with the meteoric advances in combat technology and the inadequacy of training for the situations in the senior commander had to have led to the worst war the world has ever seen- I am just completly convinced nothing was more brutal than WW1.
Love to hear everyone's thoughts on it.
I am starting to crack the books on WW1- seen some more old time pics of my great grandfather the doughboy and it has picqued my interest.
Anyway, I am reading "World War 1" by noted historian SLA (Slam) Marshall. I was reading some of the information around Verdun and Falkenhayn's thoughts on the war in general. I just read on in absolute horror how he basically intended Verdun to be the last ditch battle by making it so bloody and costly that all the nations would capitulate and get it over. The amazing thing is that it sort of did the opposite. Sort of reminded me of the quote by Captain Miller (Tom Hanks) in SPR when he said "If I order one forward then I hope that is ten lives I just saved" but on a macro scale.
WW1 just boggles the mind- the numbers in men and material are just insane- I was reading about 132 French and British divisions engaged in battle- 132!!! It just boggles the mind. Plus the spent shells and other logistics.
I read "Why nations go to war" my freshman year in college and it touched on some of the circumstances surrounding the collision in 1914. It just seems like such a failure in terms of civilian leadership and diplomacy. Couple that with the meteoric advances in combat technology and the inadequacy of training for the situations in the senior commander had to have led to the worst war the world has ever seen- I am just completly convinced nothing was more brutal than WW1.
Love to hear everyone's thoughts on it.