George is BoM (1 Viewer)

Fraxinus

Master Sergeant
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
1,257
IMG_0068.jpg



Testing the new camera and how it works via photobucket. At BoM, Washington was an aide to Braddock and no longer in the Virginia Miltia, so he wasn't wearing his regimental uniform, but a long red coat. So on the BoM shelf, I use this figure to represent Washington. By accident, the photo shows a BM-01 and a BM-08 grenadier in similar firing poses. You can see the improvement in painting in the later BM-08. The eyes are noticeably different in appearance. The mitre cap is more refined in the BM-08.
 
Last edited:
IMG_0068.jpg



Testing the new camera and how it works via photobucket. At BoM, Washington was an aide to Braddock and no longer in the Virginia Miltia, so he wasn't wearing his regimental uniform, but a long red coat. So on the BoM shelf, I use this figure to represent Washington. By accident, the photo shows a BM-01 and a BM-08 grenadier in similar firing poses. You can see the improvement in painting in the later BM-08. The eyes are noticeably different in appearance. The mitre cap is more refined in the BM-08.

definitely noticeable with the enlargement of your photo...definitely an improvement too...

I think some his earlier work was more "toyish"...not an insult by any means...that was his early style...the newer stuff is different...much more realistic...you know...he's pretty new at this size and style...I think it took him a bit to shake the 28mm style...

I have noticed that he has moved away from the raised sculpted eyebrows and foreheads that appeared more prominent on the earlier BM, FM and VM series and refined and slekened them along with the faces also...

I'm really happy...his work is getting better and better...
 
IMG_0068.jpg



Testing the new camera and how it works via photobucket. At BoM, Washington was an aide to Braddock and no longer in the Virginia Miltia, so he wasn't wearing his regimental uniform, but a long red coat. So on the BoM shelf, I use this figure to represent Washington. By accident, the photo shows a BM-01 and a BM-08 grenadier in similar firing poses. You can see the improvement in painting in the later BM-08. The eyes are noticeably different in appearance. The mitre cap is more refined in the BM-08.

Fraxinus,
How do you know that Washington was in a red coat?
Mark
 
Washington was no longer the commander of the Virginian colonials, and was not formally in the British Army. He was a civilian recognized as an aid to Braddock. The figure in my display is Wolfe from Frontline.

In paintings of the battle, Washington is depicted in a red dress coat. I recall reading that Washington's coat had numerous bullet holes penetrating the cloth, something around 4. I am certain that Washington role in the battle and probably his coat are described in the accounts of the battle and newspapers of the day. I believe the PBS video about the FIW and the Paladin videos (When the Forest Ran Red?) have Washington in a red coat, but could be wrong.

On old threads posted about needed releases for BoM, I think Combat often suggested the need to have an appropriately dressed Washington.

Much better links available, but if you look here, you will see Washington kneeling next to Braddock, and JJD's Scaroudyady.


http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...s=en&ndsp=18&tbm=isch&ei=Y8q_TdhDjJa3B4frocgF
 
The PBS documentary on FWI has Washington in a long red coat (The War that Made America) similar to the one on Frontline's Wolfe.

I then briefly checked the "When the Forest Ran Red" and Washington is in a Blue and Red Coat.

So ......
 
Washington was no longer the commander of the Virginian colonials, and was not formally in the British Army. He was a civilian recognized as an aid to Braddock.

This is the most compelling argument that Washington would have been in a red coat rather than the VA uniform at Monongahela. My recollection though is that there is no confirmation as to which uniform he wore that day. I believe there is some mention in the recent "Washington" book by Chernow of uniforms that Washington had ordered from a tailor in London, but I don't believe it shed any light on this issue. Might be an interesting topic to pursue. One painting by Patricia Pamela White shows him in the VA uniform. I spoke with her husband who is also an artist and he confirmed that there were conflicting opinions. Here is a link to her painting:

http://www.ppatrickwhite.com/Pages/ExpeditionOf1755.htm

One additional thought - Washington was known for being 'thrifty" to put it nicely. He was also unusually tall for his time. So acquiring a new jacket/uniform would have no small task. Particularly since most of his cloths were tailored made/ordered from England and would have taken some time to process and receive. That might lend credence to his wearing the VA uniform unless someone on Braddock's staff was able to lend him a uniform. But just a guess.
 
There is a new book on Washington's early military career. I haven't read it, but it might be of interest: George Washington's First War: His Early Military Adventures by David A. Clary

“I heard the bullets whistle, and, believe me, there is something charming in the sound.” So said the young George Washington, something no veteran soldier would say. He had not been the target of enemy fire. Instead, he was papering over the fact that his men and Indian allies had just massacred a diplomatic party, setting off the French and Indian War of 1754–63. He had violated international law, something else he would not admit. Washington could, after all, tell a lie. That is but one revelation that acclaimed military historian and Washington expert David A. Clary offers in George Washington’s First War. Washington spent his adolescence in military service, starting as a colonel in command at the age of twenty-two. He came from a society without a military tradition, and had no training or battle-wise sergeants to keep him out of trouble. He was a young glory hound thrust into circumstances he was not prepared to handle by elders who should have known better. Leading reluctant amateur soldiers against French professionals, when he took command he was on his own. Accordingly, Washington survived a five-year ordeal unlike that endured by any other Founding Father. He emerged from it not yet the steady supreme commander of the Revolution, but he had started on the road that led him to become the great soldier and statesman of his age. How he began his life’s journey is what George Washington’s First War is about. It is a dramatic story of frontier warfare played out against the anxieties and resentments of an ambitious adolescent. Here are accounts of harrowing ordeals in the wilderness, the decisive part played by the Indian nations whose continent this was, and the epic clash of empires. Others have looked at Washington’s activities during the French and Indian War without recognizing that he played his part in that history during his painful transition from boy to man. His repeated blunders and defeats arose from his youthful impetuosity and inexperience and weak support from his government. Clary has a sound understanding of eighteenth-century wilderness warfare, and his descriptions of battles are vivid, exciting, and laced with horrifying details. Brought to dramatic life are Washington’s harrowing wintertime journey into the wilderness to order the French to leave the territory, the Jumonville Massacre, his bloody defeat at Fort Necessity, his heroism at the Battle of the Monongahela (Braddock’s Defeat), his years of frustration commanding the Virginia Regiment, the Forbes Expedition of 1758, his insubordination to civil and military superiors, and his resignation from the army. A revealing portrait of Washington during a crucial, formative period of his life, this is the indispensable backstory to the making of a great man.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top