I did a search and found a website that had a review of the movie and said it is the best war movie ever made, the best movie of the decade and by far Eastwoods best work, worthy of best director award.
Don't know if I'd go quite that far, but I will go see it and decide for myself. It was interesting that the reviewer (maybe for the NY Times?) said "Flags" was a flop and did terrible at the box office and was a rah rah war film with no substance to it. Can't really agree with that line of thinking...........