I was wondering something similar--will the remake have the made-up stuff, too?
The original was great, though, ushered in the Age of the Mini-Series. I have to ask in this case, as in the case of all other remakes--Really? Did "Roots" need to be remade? What's next--a remake of "Shogun"? "The Thornbirds"? "North and South"? "Winds of War"?
Prost!
Brad
Brad,
I feel you man. After
12 Years a Slave I was like "okay I get it" and just the other day I watched the tail end of
Amistad that was just awful. Awful as in the story not the filmmaking. Both were great films and vivid to the memory of the audience, but again after
12 Years a Slave I just could not stomach another slave era flick...at least for a while.
But remaking
Roots is a whole other topic. Yeah, you wonder why they decided to give it a "do over". I mean what did the original not cover that will be covered in this remake? I don't know, but I will watch it to see. I say leave it alone and let the original stand as a classic. Heck, I bought the classic on DVD just in case I needed a Chicken George fix.
Anyway, Alex Haley spent a little time in San Antonio when he was younger and lived on the RiverWalk. Doing what I don't know, but he did live here for a spell. I just find it sad that he admitted to plagiarism to one of the most famous Novels in the last Century. I mean there is
In Cold Blood by Capote,
For Whom the Bell Tolls by Hemingway, On the Road by Kerouc,
To Kill a MockingBird by Lee and on and on. In my opinion,
Roots ranked up there with those novels of the century, but after the revelation it was sadly tarnished.
Anyway Brad, I hope we don't have a run of re-makes like we have seen from the Toy Soldier manufactures.
John from Texas