Scale Comparison KC Pacific Sherman vs FIGARTI (PICTURES) (1 Viewer)

[desk11desk12]

In case anyone was interested in the comparisons here they are.

BTW, I added an extra antenna to the KC Sherman tank for kicks.

What do you think?

Carlos

 

[desk11desk12]

 

[King & Country]

View attachment 254058

View attachment 254059

View attachment 254060

MANY THANKS CARLOS!
Personally I prefer the K&C ‘Pacific’ Sherman however...
I also admit to being more than a wee bit biased!!!
All the best,
Andy.

 

[ExRanger]

So who’s the true 1/30 th scale?

 

[Phantom Warrior]

So who’s the true 1/30 th scale?

Taking the length of an M1A1 Sherman at 584 cm, the Figarti is 1:29.66 (close to 1:30) and the K&C is 1:28.74 (quite a bit larger)

Taking the width of an M1A1 Sherman at 261 cm, the Figarti is 1:31.6 (quite a bit smaller than 1:30 in fact closer to 1:32 than to 1:30) and the K&C is 1:29.36 (close to 1:30)

Also note the Figarti and K&C tanks are not the same versions of the Sherman so that will introduce some inaccuracies in comparisons.

Terry

 

[Larry Allen]

Thank You Carlos and Terry,
So it appears that they are BOTH somewhat accurate and a toss up in that regard.
I "generally" do not pay to much attention to the scale inaccuracies especially when they are this close in size.

I am not sure who that ANDY character is ..^&grin .. but I must agree with him ... I much prefer the K&C if only for the visual aspects and attention to greater details.
As a large collector of the K&C USMC sets the Sherman and the figures blend very well together.
Just my opinion

---LaRRy

 

[Phantom Warrior]

One thing I watch for is how close the scales of length, width and height are to each other. If there is too much difference in scales for L, W & H the shape of the vehicle gets distorted giving a misshaped vehicle.

Terry

 

[HB120050]

Dark colors always have a slimming effect. ^&grin