The Birth of a Nation on Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

BLReed

Sergeant Major
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
1,676
220px-Birth_of_a_Nation_theatrical_poster.jpg
A silent film from 1915. A classic in some circles. I've never seen a silent film.
Supposedly, it has been restored. I've ordered it so I'll see. Maybe I can see
my great grandfather and great uncles in their "robes."

Released on 22 November. Probably not widely, so Amazon is probably your
best bet if interested.
http://www.amazon.com/Birth-Nation-...1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1321835744&sr=1-1


Wiki has quite a write-up to read for background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_a_Nation
 
It is a remarkable film, but quite unlike films made today. It is super un-PC but a very interesting piece of early film making with good action sequences. Just remember that silent films used acting and action in place of words. -- Al
 
One of the most notorious rascist movies ever made. An attempt to rewrite history. Other than as a glimpse into attitude of some elements and a historical curiosity, it deserves to be burned.
 
It is a remarkable film, but quite unlike films made today. It is super un-PC but a very interesting piece of early film making with good action sequences. Just remember that silent films used acting and action in place of words. -- Al

Lancer, I have a DVD copy and Dixon's The Clansman with photos from the movie. ( A later printing)
For the time the story was written, the story was very "PC." The film is definitely worth watching as a period piece.

From an earlier topic, both the movie and the book have accounts of Lincoln's assassination that are "respectful" of history.

I was surprised at the sympathy Dixon had for Lincoln as expressed by his characters.

"...As around this man's personality had gathered the agony and horror of war, so now about his head glowed and gleamed in imagination the splendours of victory. Margaret impulsively put her hand on Phil's arm:

"Why, how Southern he looks! How tall and dark and typical his whole figure!"

"Yes, and his traits of character even more typical," said Phil. "On the surface, easy friendly ways and the tenderness of a woman—beneath, an iron will and lion heart. I like him. And what always amazes me is his universality. A Southerner finds in him the South, the Western man the West, even Charles Sumner, from Boston, almost loves him. You know I think he is the first great all-round American who ever lived in the White House.".."
 
Lancer, I have a DVD copy and Dixon's The Clansman with photos from the movie. ( A later printing)
For the time the story was written, the story was very "PC." The film is definitely worth watching as a period piece.

From an earlier topic, both the movie and the book have accounts of Lincoln's assassination that are "respectful" of history.

I was surprised at the sympathy Dixon had for Lincoln as expressed by his characters.

"...As around this man's personality had gathered the agony and horror of war, so now about his head glowed and gleamed in imagination the splendours of victory. Margaret impulsively put her hand on Phil's arm:

"Why, how Southern he looks! How tall and dark and typical his whole figure!"

"Yes, and his traits of character even more typical," said Phil. "On the surface, easy friendly ways and the tenderness of a woman—beneath, an iron will and lion heart. I like him. And what always amazes me is his universality. A Southerner finds in him the South, the Western man the West, even Charles Sumner, from Boston, almost loves him. You know I think he is the first great all-round American who ever lived in the White House.".."
It is an important film in terms of film-making history and film buffs should watch it. It certainly is not an easy film to watch and enjoy because of it's story, since, because it might express the sentiments of certain segments of the US population back then, the film is very offensive in today's world. Griffith had his agenda. Still, it is worth watching for the filming techniques and the insight into early film expression. -- Al
 
I don't know if Griffith had an agenda other than to make a good movie from a popular story. Considering some of this other films, he was going for the BIG story.

Riefenstahl and Eisenstein did some amazing work on now controversial themes.
 
I don't know if Griffith had an agenda other than to make a good movie from a popular story. Considering some of this other films, he was going for the BIG story.

Riefenstahl and Eisenstein did some amazing work on now controversial themes.
Potemkin, Nevsky, and Triumph are all brilliant films. Hard to find a more horrible subject to immortilize on film than Triumph of the Will did. I take your word on Griffith. Don't know much about him beyond what I see on the screen. -- Al
 
Potemkin, Nevsky, and Triumph are all brilliant films. Hard to find a more horrible subject to immortilize on film than Triumph of the Will did. I take your word on Griffith. Don't know much about him beyond what I see on the screen. -- Al

Not to thread hy-jack but Griffith made a couple of history films that you can get on DVD...

http://movies.netflix.com/Movie/America/249043?trkid=147042

http://movies.netflix.com/Movie/Orphans-of-the-Storm/831711?trkid=147042

http://movies.netflix.com/Movie/Abraham-Lincoln-The-Struggle/70108229?trkid=147042

http://movies.netflix.com/Movie/Intolerance/22304193?trkid=147042

AMERICA is pretty good but made the Buckman Tavern on Lexington Green seem like a high rise hotel inside. Good Tory villain.
 
Thanks for the info, Scott. I have seen Intolerance somewhere along the line, but not the others. -- Al
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top