Trying to figure out the various figures in the Raid on St Francis 1759 Range (1 Viewer)

egonzinc

Sergeant
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
747
Looking over the various figures in this range and reading on the historical raid in 1759, I believe the raid was Roger's Rangers on a settlement. I don't understand where the various state militia units fit in.

Were the defenders of St Francis indians and the Canadian militia included in the range, or mainly indians?

Appreciate any insight.

Thanks in advance

Eduardo
 
Last edited:
You're correct about the battle. Not sure why the various provincial regiments are included in that part of the catalog. It might have been better to have made a generic "French and Indian War" catalog for those.

Our own Pennsylvania Provincial Regiment didn't serve outside the colony, as far as I know. It was raised by the General Assembly to defend our own frontier, with the natural barrier of the Susquehanna River serving as a defensive line. We established a major fort, Fort Augusta, at the confluence of the North and West Branches of the Susquehanna (present-day Sunbury, PA), and smaller forts, outposts, really, south along the river to its mouth in the Chesapeake Bay. The regiment operated along this line, and into the back country of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers.

It's interesting to consider that the regiment had to be raised anew each year, with a new bill in the Assembly. The politics were complicated. Some Quakers were against raising any armed force; other Quakers supported it. And among the other English settlers, some were against any kind of standing force, others were for it. Masters wanted recompense for any indentured servants or apprentices who wanted to enlist. And the Penn family was against paying any taxes of any kind on their own properties (they eventually agreed to pay a special rate). Getting the regiment established at all was a real achievement.

Prost!
Brad
 
You're correct about the battle. Not sure why the various provincial regiments are included in that part of the catalog. It might have been better to have made a generic "French and Indian War" catalog for those.

Brad

I had the same confusion about the 60th Royal Americans so I asked JJD

I noticed some of the labels on the boxes for these figures say Plains of Abraham and some say Raid On St. Francis? I don't know of any connection the 60th had with St. Francis? I'm getting the 60th as they were beside the 6 pdr gun which I got with the 2 man crew. Misprint? . When I checked with the web sites (Toy Soldiers Club, Treefrog, JJD UK, Minuteman, Hobby Bunker) some dealers had them all in Abraham and some dealers had them all in St. Francis.


JJD's reply
You are correct about the labels on the 60[SUP]th[/SUP]. I decided to make figures which were more “non combat” so felt they would not be suitable for the Plains Of Abrahams series. The Raid on St Francis is split into two parts , with preparation at the British fort etcThis seemed a more suitable place to “hang” the range so to speak, as I have a few figures chopping wood, and just standing around…
There will be loading and firing poses which will be suitable for the Plains of Abraham series available in a few months.
Its often the case with this period that certain figures are suitable for different collections, and its sometimes difficult to know where to place them.
*** who you probably know from the forum asked me to develop more figures for the 60[SUP]th[/SUP] which could be used around the fort, so that’s where the confusion has come from!

I didn't agree with the reasoning and just bought the 60th figures I liked most and used them in my Plains of Abraham collection. I never collected figures for the St. Francis series

Terry
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top