New WWI 2/5th Battalion Gloucestshire Regt Figures (1 Viewer)

The Military Workshop

1st Lieutenant
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
4,778
Hi Guys,
I looked up this battalion to find out a bit more and found the below information on the Naval and Military Press book web page (note a lot of connections with the Aussies and also at Cambrai) :
2/5th BATTALION THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE REGIMENT 1914-1918
The 2/5th Gloucestershire was a second line Territorial battalion, formed in Gloucester in September 1914 and allocated to the 2/1st Gloucester & Worcester Brigade of the 2nd South Midland Division. Both the latter formations were also second line, and in August 1915 were numbered 184th Brigade, 61st Division. The battalion remained in the same brigade throughout the war, serving on the Western Front from May 1916 (when the division landed in France) to the armistice. The Roll of Honour lists some 600 officers and men giving details of place of burial or memorial on which commemorated. There are also details of Honours and Awards. The battalion began its active service in the Laventie sector where the newly arrived division was alongside the newly arrived 5th Australian Division. Both divisions took part in the ill-fated attack on Fromelles in July which cost the Australians 5,500 casualties and the 61st Division 1,550; it also earned the division the soubriquet “61st and worst” from the Australians. 2/5th Glosters were in reserve and it was they who had the depressing task of bringing in and burying the dead, which took three or four days, nor did the Germans fire a shot on stretcher bearers and others wandering about No Man’s Land in broad daylight. The battalion moved down to the Somme at the end of October, too late for any of the battles but in time to follow up the German retreat to the Hindenburg in March/April 1917. Then Third Ypres, Cambrai and the German counter-attack, the March 1918 offensive during the first two weeks of which the division suffered some 6,000 casualties. In preparing this account the editor stresses that it purports to be the story of a battalion and so he has been “ruthless” in omitting a mass of material he received dealing centering round companies, platoons and sections. Furthermore he asserts that the narrative should reflect a human document rather than a treatise on military operations, and so he has included anecdotes wherever possible and mentioned names but excluded matters of a technical nature such as operation orders or dispositions of other units except where they affect the 2/5th Glosters. For the bare facts of the narrative he has relied almost entirely on the notes of three of the COs and on other officers and NCOs. Most of the photos are of individuals or groups.

I was wondering why this Battaliion and for a short while thought it might have been the Battalion commanded by Churchill (which was Scots Fusiliers) but it was not. Anyway a WWI Churchill could be done.

Regards
Brett
 
Some info on the unit insignia is found in Osprey title Men-at-Arms #182, "British Battle Insignia (1): 1914-1918. Illustation E1, description pg. 46. Divisional thumbnail on pg. 37. -- lancer
 
Some info on the unit insignia is found in Osprey title Men-at-Arms #182, "British Battle Insignia (1): 1914-1918. Illustation E1, description pg. 46. Divisional thumbnail on pg. 37. -- lancer

Additional info also found in Osprey #245 "British Territorial Units 1914-1918. Illustration G5, description pg.44.
 
Fast forward to 1917, and really impressed with the poses on these guys. Particularly like the 3 or 4 sets of assaulting figures, and with the eventual addition of a figure struggling with a wire cutters in front of the German wire this will make an excellent diorama I think. Looking forward to seeing them up close in the near future. At the same time, I do wish they were wearing their small box respirator bags.

MD
 
Fast forward to 1917, and really impressed with the poses on these guys. Particularly like the 3 or 4 sets of assaulting figures, and with the eventual addition of a figure struggling with a wire cutters in front of the German wire this will make an excellent diorama I think. Looking forward to seeing them up close in the near future. At the same time, I do wish they were wearing their small box respirator bags.

MD
I am really impressed with the new British infantry and I especially like the officer with the walking stick, but the omission of the respirators is rather curious for this time period. -- lancer
 
I am really impressed with the new British infantry and I especially like the officer with the walking stick, but the omission of the respirators is rather curious for this time period. -- lancer

I agree about the officer, and also really like the wouned being carried set and the mills bomber as they are very dynamic and classic looking WWI Tommies in action.

MD
 
Is there a reason why the new 1917 range is so much more expensive than the 1914 range? I collect Britains's AZW range and have so wanted a later WWI range to collect as well but unfortunately K&C have priced me out.

For instance to buy a KOSB figure kneeling firing is £20.41 for me but to buy a kneeling firing 2/5th figure will cost me £29.71. For US buyers the difference is not as dramatic so why are UK buyers having to bear such a heavy burden?
 
I think i'll limit too my expenditure for this year..nonetheless i'll focus on the less expensive sets..maybe in the future the price will go down a bit..you have a point Isandlwana:Why this difference between the 2 markets?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top