Castings and/or painted (1 Viewer)

Imperial Miniatures

Private 1st Class
Joined
Aug 17, 2015
Messages
246
I am interested in people's opinions on how the ability to buy castings affects their view of a range?

If a glossy range (such as the AQM range I am starting to put back into production) is available as castings does that lessen the value of the painted "collectible" sets with a "factory" paint job or does it make no difference to you? Are the markets for castings and finished painted sets different from each other?

I know that a number of the glossy manufacturers do supply their figures as castings and wondered how it affects people's buying patterns. Do you always buy a casting because it is cheaper, or always buy a finished figure because you are not interested in painting?

What is an ideal price relationship between a casting requiring assembly and a finished painted figure - i.e. what is having a figure assembled and cast worth to you?

Many thanks for the feedback

Mike
 
I don't think there are too many painters out there who can do justice to an AQM figure. But I don't think that should keep you from selling castings as I would have loved to have bought some when I painted regularly. Some manufacturers sell castings about half that of a finished figure, but as I don't know your price schedule for the latter, it's hard to come up with an exact recommendation. But don't price them too high . . . $10-12 for a foot soldier, $15 for a mounted soldier. More than that and I think you'll discourage the buyer. (Scale Link has priced themselves out of my market.) If castings don't sell well, you can always paint whatever castings theml. Another thought is how to provide the best painting guide . . . packaged with the figure or on-line?

Bosun Al
 
I agree to Al....
Cheers
A_C

I don't think there are too many painters out there who can do justice to an AQM figure. But I don't think that should keep you from selling castings as I would have loved to have bought some when I painted regularly. Some manufacturers sell castings about half that of a finished figure, but as I don't know your price schedule for the latter, it's hard to come up with an exact recommendation. But don't price them too high . . . $10-12 for a foot soldier, $15 for a mounted soldier. More than that and I think you'll discourage the buyer. (Scale Link has priced themselves out of my market.) If castings don't sell well, you can always paint whatever castings theml. Another thought is how to provide the best painting guide . . . packaged with the figure or on-line?

Bosun Al
 
I don't think there are too many painters out there who can do justice to an AQM figure. But I don't think that should keep you from selling castings as I would have loved to have bought some when I painted regularly. Some manufacturers sell castings about half that of a finished figure, but as I don't know your price schedule for the latter, it's hard to come up with an exact recommendation. But don't price them too high . . . $10-12 for a foot soldier, $15 for a mounted soldier. More than that and I think you'll discourage the buyer. (Scale Link has priced themselves out of my market.) If castings don't sell well, you can always paint whatever castings theml. Another thought is how to provide the best painting guide . . . packaged with the figure or on-line?

Bosun Al

Many thanks for the response. The figures are priced at (roughly) £12.50 for foot/£35 for mounted if painted. Did you really mean $15 for a mounted figure? I am assuming it should be $25? At half the painted cost it would be similar to ATS figures if I sold castings - say £6.50 for foot and £17 for mounted.

I am still thinking about it - I have been asked by a few people and I hadn't intended to do it as I was worried it might diminish the market for people who collect the painted figures...

Also thinking about painting guides - I would probably blister the figures if castings as the packing would keep all the small bits together (and I already blister a lot of my wargaming figures for trade orders) but that limits putting a painted picture of the figure on the outside of the packaging. Possibly using strong plastic bags and header cards (as per ATS) would be better? What do people prefer? I am working through photographing example figures and have another photo session with an AQM collector on Saturday.

Mike
 
I am interested in people's opinions on how the ability to buy castings affects their view of a range?

If a glossy range (such as the AQM range I am starting to put back into production) is available as castings does that lessen the value of the painted "collectible" sets with a "factory" paint job or does it make no difference to you? Are the markets for castings and finished painted sets different from each other?

I know that a number of the glossy manufacturers do supply their figures as castings and wondered how it affects people's buying patterns. Do you always buy a casting because it is cheaper, or always buy a finished figure because you are not interested in painting?

What is an ideal price relationship between a casting requiring assembly and a finished painted figure - i.e. what is having a figure assembled and cast worth to you?

Many thanks for the feedback

Mike

Thanks for asking Mike. As you may remember, I'm one of the guys who asked whether you would be offering a castings option for some of the past AQM range (specifically - the Agincourt range of figures).

To answer your points - as they come (from my perspective).

I don't think that offering castings would diminish the value of your own painted versions one iota. How would it? Home painted versions are going to vary enormously - and most people like me, who paint for the sheer loove of the challenge - isn't going to part with their example anyway. So who is going to see the finished article? - the guy who buys it.

Yes - I'm guessing that the markets for castings v painted are very different. Put simply, if I can't get the casting I want from you - I don't buy a painted one - I go elsewhere - or do without. In MY case - I go elsewhere and make the same "knight" ( or whatever) up - with a different casting.

I always buy either a casting - or a damaged figure on the secondary market - to make up to what I want. Yes - I get around twice the figures for a similar amount of money - but for me - the fun is in the challenge to make a decent figure - in the way I want it. I tried buying "painted, off the shelf" and found it DEEPLY dissatisfying. I want to be involved in the process - so I assemble, modify, convert and paint - because THAT'S my hobby. If I couldn't - I would just find another hobby.

As to pricing - my general rule of thumb has always been - if a casting costs MORE than half of what a painted figure would cost me from the same supplier - I don't buy it - as I know I'm being ripped off - and believe me - I do not like that. I've seen gradual step increases in the price of castings from one particular well known seller of both genres - which has now taken casting kits well above half of their painted products - and I just don't buy them anymore. They may be well cast - but I'm a Glossy Toy Soldier painter - and I don't need that amount of detail at the prices he's asking.

My ideal foot figure would cost around £5 - and maybe a cavalry figure around £12 - and I DO buy these from one favourite supplier now at around these prices or under. I also recently made myself a set of Mounted Life Guards from figures purchased on e-bay - which I had great fun in cleaning up, repairing and then painting. The cost (including postage) came in at around £10 per figure - including paints etc.

Hope that helps put things in perspective from the way I see things. I will wait and see what you decide to do - and maybe we will do business - or there again - maybe we won't - but best of luck whatever. But I DO hope you do decide to offer some of the excellent old sculpts I've seen anyway. I honestly can't see why you shouldn't make some extra sales this way - as there MUST be others like me - who just don't buy painted figures at the ridiculous prices you see some being offered for nowadays, by some manufacturers.

And..............thanks again for asking Mike - best of luck whatever you decide to do. johnnybach
 
I don't think there are too many painters out there who can do justice to an AQM figure.

Sorry, Al, I disagree. I think there are many of us who could paint 'em up quite nicely. However, both your statement and mine are subjective opinion, so I won't debate you, I'll just stick with, I have a different opinion from yours.

I do think, however, that it does make sense to consider how many people would be interested in buying castings. Of course, selling blank castings isn't like selling finished figures and sets, in that Imperial wouldn't have to lay in a stock of pieces ahead of time. They can be cast to order. And castings that don't sell go right back in the casting pot. So to offer castings for sale doesn't generate too much additional cost, versus the profit to be made.

If I remember correctly, AQM produced a series of Imperial German figures, particularly cavalry. I'd be interested in buying them.

Prost!
Brad
 
I don't think there are too many painters out there who can do justice to an AQM figure. But I don't think that should keep you from selling castings as I would have loved to have bought some when I painted regularly. Some manufacturers sell castings about half that of a finished figure, but as I don't know your price schedule for the latter, it's hard to come up with an exact recommendation. But don't price them too high . . . $10-12 for a foot soldier, $15 for a mounted soldier. More than that and I think you'll discourage the buyer. (Scale Link has priced themselves out of my market.) If castings don't sell well, you can always paint whatever castings theml. Another thought is how to provide the best painting guide . . . packaged with the figure or on-line?

Bosun Al


I just don't get that Al. If you go into a TS shop and buy a casting - they don't ask you how good/bad you are at painting before they sell you one. The only response I can think of is "how many would you like":D

Good, bad or indifferent - a sale is a sale.......is a sale.{sm4}:salute:: jb
 
Many good points here and a potentially lively topic. I suspect there is general agreement that these are different markets with little overlap. Few collectors paint and painters are extremely cautious about buying painted collectibles. Price is very important for the painter since the intrinsic value of the finished product will reflect the value adding of the work done. This is a very personal assessment of course and discussions such as the one here offer the opportunity of grounding individual perceptions. This benefits both ends of the marketing so well done for initiating the discussion. I am not convinced that there is a formula for the relationship between painted figure and casting. I think the price depends on competition within the casting market and broad perceptions of price gouging probably reflect a non-competitive market. I have returned to the palette and brush with the falling Aus dollar and find this topic well worth the effort. Cheers, Bob
 
I'm a painter and so I prefer to buy casting if they are available.

Makers like Tradition and Alexander's Toy Soldiers are a couple of brands that I have painted many figures of and they also sell painted set.

Like someone said ' a sale is a sale' so why not?

John
 
I am interested in people's opinions on how the ability to buy castings affects their view of a range?

If a glossy range (such as the AQM range I am starting to put back into production) is available as castings does that lessen the value of the painted "collectible" sets with a "factory" paint job or does it make no difference to you? Are the markets for castings and finished painted sets different from each other?

I know that a number of the glossy manufacturers do supply their figures as castings and wondered how it affects people's buying patterns. Do you always buy a casting because it is cheaper, or always buy a finished figure because you are not interested in painting?

What is an ideal price relationship between a casting requiring assembly and a finished painted figure - i.e. what is having a figure assembled and cast worth to you?

Many thanks for the feedback

Mike

Hi Mike,

Firstly; good luck with AQM. You are doing the Hobby a Service.

Secondly, I would echo the majority of opinions expressed thus far: undoubtedly, there are two distinct markets. But there will always be crossovers as peoples tastes and circumstances change. I know, that at my age, I will buy a painted figure of something I like/want rather than bother with sourcing a casting.

As there are two different markets, the "collectors" couldn't care less that there is a casting available, and vice versa. When it comes to resale, most buyers know the difference between a "home paint" and a "factory paint". Generally speaking, on the secondary market the "factory paint" will always sell for more. unless the "home paint" is of exceptional quality. I have seen "home paints" sell for less than their "casting value", and I can't really explain that! For "second-hand" items, most castings seem to hold their value, on the secondary market, extremely well.

Traditionally, casting manafacturers have always sold their product (castings)at a "high" price because this is a "smaller" market. The theory is that they will sell only one casting to a hobbyist whereas they will sell a "set" of the same figures to a "collector" (notwithstanding the "costs" of painting, boxing etc) It is a question of amatising the initial costs of sculpting and mould making.

I can give you no specific advise about price differentials between castings and painted figures, other than to say, "don't be greedy". It is too easy to overprice both. The market perception is that you should have paid a "second-hand" price for the masters/moulds etc, which should be "less" than what it would originally cost to engage sculptors etc.

My advice to you is that, as a service to the Hobby, you should offer both options. At the risk of boring those who already know the storey, let me recount the "Rose Miniatures" saga. In 1953, on the occasion of HM the Queens Coronation, young Russell Gammage, fresh out of Art School, made his first "Military Miniatures". These were so well received that he started a business: "Rose Miniatures". He was very ably assisted by his good lady wife and her sister. It was a very successful business.

Unfortunately, in the late 80's early 90's, (I can't remember the precise details now) Mrs Gammage passed away. Within 18 months of this tragic event, Russell announced his retirement, and the sale of Rose Miniatures to "Ceremonial Studios", of Poole in Dorset.

When this occurred, I recall great fanfare in the modelling press, Ceremonial was going to take the Hobby to a new level, etc etc. However, within 6-9 months, everything went very quiet.

Several years later (again the memory is not good on the exact timing), along came one, Jim Robinson, ex-Soldier (Fusilier), Toy Soldier enthusiast and very successful "Fish & Chip Shop" owner. Jim purchased the entire Rose range from Ceremonial, and announced that he was going to offer "Painted Sets" under the brand name "Fusilier". He later told me that he had consulted Russell about his intentions and had received Russell's "blessing".

I was then running a Mail Order Business, and the prospect of perhaps getting "Rose castigs" was akin to finding the Holy Grail. So I wrote a "pleading" letter asking him to consider offering the castings again.

Jim was inundated with similar requests from around the world. Within a very short time he had Rose Miniatures up and running, using the traditional packaging, etc [it was just like the "old days" Schultz!]

I dealt with Jim for many years thereafter, selling both Fusilier and Rose. When the Marlowes decided to retire, he purchased the entire ranges of Phoenix.

The best selling range of Phoenix, wasn't a TS range at all, but the 1/12th Dolls House furniture. Jim, who was a very astute businessman quickly cottoned on to that, and in a very short time he had sold off everything exect the Doll's House stuff. As far as I know he is still dealing in Doll's House stuff, or maybe he has retired to the South of France??

John Eden bought the entire Rose inventory, and quite a bit else. Originally he offered Rose figures as painted sets (and singles also, I think) as well as castings. In recent years he has dropped the painted ranges. I don't personally know the reason for that, although I would guess that getting reliable, well priced painters, may have been a factor.

I'm sorry, I did say it was a saga. What are the lessons to be learned? First and foremost, I think it shows that good casting ranges can have a very long and useful life. I would venture to say, a longer life than their painted cousins. I am not fully familiar with the AQM range so I don't really know if this applys, but Jim, and later John, I believe, quickly discovered that Rose had some serious gaps in "sets", eg: 10 figures in a set but no drummer, or standard etc. So they had to have one made.

Fusilier were also painted as "well painted toy soldiers", suitable for sale in sets. It would be interesting to see if good castings like Rose and AQM, would sell better if painted to a similar standard as the "modern matte" figures coming out of China? Either as sets or single figures?

Mike, if you can find him, Jim Robinson would be a great bloke to talk to about your intentions.

Happy Collecting, Guys,

Bob
 
Having re-read my original post, I see that I was not clear about uniform guidelines. (Unfortunately, such lapses are all to common for octogenarians!) With so many possible combinations, it would be difficult to package each with the desired instructions. The simple solution would be to have an area on your website with the correct information.

Bosun Al
 
Hello

My first question will be : is this the same company who produced in the 80ies with logo and boxes like ? :

WebbR-All-the-queens-men.jpg

At that time only kit form including the first Chotta Sahib 90mm; I painted 2 of them early 80ies

WR-Indes-Officier-2.jpg WR-Sikh-1.jpg


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I still have 2 others Chotta in their original packing ... AQM .
Now : I'm basicaly a "painter" not a collector ( matt painting ), so, you're welcome in editing kit form .
Now the thorny question : price; half the price of a painted one seems more than fair compared to actual kitmakers selling at an average 30$ unpainted ( metal) but with a very high level of details .
Perhaps you could propose at first a range of 54mm, same period, same country and see the reaction but remember the market is not the same, there are actualy so many makers ( more than 1000 ) .
Also you could push in the direction of figures made to be painted together for making small dioramas . This seems to be more and more a tendancy with the " toy soldiers" actual makers .

Best
 
Malcolm,

Another one for making castings available. There are some desirable figures and ranges among those All the Queen's Men figures, the Colonial figures are very desirable (there aren't a lot of Boer War figures around).

I have always thought that line that making castings available reduces the desirability of a range or devalues it a furphy. Is there any evidence that supports it?

Regarding painting instructions and packaging, I can only speak for myself but they are not high priorities. Most painters have plenty of painting reference books and as long as the castings arrive securely packaged they don't need to be in a fancy box. Putting the painting instructions online sounds like a good idea.

What are figures worth? I'm not sure. I recently purchased a Valiant Miniatures figure new online for around $15.00 US. It was cast in pewter, came in a blister pack and had rudimentary painting instructions. I thought that a reasonable price.

Bob,

Thanks for the background to the demise of Rose Miniatures. With Trooper gone there can’t be too many people around with knowledge of the older manufacturers. You don't know what happened to the Ozmade range?

Scott
 
Many thanks to everyone for taking the time to reply. And for the detailed replies as well.

My initial hesitation about offering castings was also based on the very poor quality of the AQM moulds - 95% of them are not usable as they require far too much clean up to provide the figures as castings. The horses are either completely shot (cracks in the mould) or they have very big lugs into the bags of the saddle, etc which require a lot of filing, etc to make usable. I have spent a few months playing with the various moulds I have and have come to the conclusion that I am better remaking all of them from scratch. This is obviously a fairly big task and, although I make my own moulds, an additional expense.

There are often comments that if a range is really old it should be sold cheaply - the current owner of Minifigs has been accused of ripping people off because his 25mm figures are priced the same as modern figures. But, as Dave points out, he employs 3 casters and pays them well above the minimum wage. The highest cost in producing figures is labour and even Toy Soldier makers have to eat :)

It would be interesting to hear from someone who only collects and doesn't paint about their view...

I have always painted my own figures and have bought them from Tradition, Asset, etc in the past and very rarely even bought painted wargaming figures; so I get the view of the painters but don't have experience of collecting a painted range.

On of my initial desires for AQM was to promote the selling of complete, painted dioramas (and I have had a few enquiries about Omdurman, etc) and possibly that is a better way to go alongside selling castings...

At the moment I only have the masters for the Colonial and British in India ranges and I would like to get those out and sold to recoup some of my investment before I move on to the other AQM ranges that I can access.

This is giving me a lot of food for thought - I am planning what I am bringing to the April Toy SOldier show in the way of stock (which should include a couple of brand new Colonial artillery pieces and crews) and this is very helpful.

thanks

Mike


Hi Mike,

Firstly; good luck with AQM. You are doing the Hobby a Service.

Secondly, I would echo the majority of opinions expressed thus far: undoubtedly, there are two distinct markets. But there will always be crossovers as peoples tastes and circumstances change. I know, that at my age, I will buy a painted figure of something I like/want rather than bother with sourcing a casting.

As there are two different markets, the "collectors" couldn't care less that there is a casting available, and vice versa. When it comes to resale, most buyers know the difference between a "home paint" and a "factory paint". Generally speaking, on the secondary market the "factory paint" will always sell for more. unless the "home paint" is of exceptional quality. I have seen "home paints" sell for less than their "casting value", and I can't really explain that! For "second-hand" items, most castings seem to hold their value, on the secondary market, extremely well.

I can give you no specific advise about price differentials between castings and painted figures, other than to say, "don't be greedy". It is too easy to overprice both. The market perception is that you should have paid a "second-hand" price for the masters/moulds etc, which should be "less" than what it would originally cost to engage sculptors etc.

My advice to you is that, as a service to the Hobby, you should offer both options. At the risk of boring those who already know the storey, let me recount the "Rose Miniatures" saga. In 1953, on the occasion of HM the Queens Coronation, young Russell Gammage, fresh out of Art School, made his first "Military Miniatures". These were so well received that he started a business: "Rose Miniatures". He was very ably assisted by his good lady wife and her sister. It was a very successful business.

Unfortunately, in the late 80's early 90's, (I can't remember the precise details now) Mrs Gammage passed away. Within 18 months of this tragic event, Russell announced his retirement, and the sale of Rose Miniatures to "Ceremonial Studios", of Poole in Dorset.

When this occurred, I recall great fanfare in the modelling press, Ceremonial was going to take the Hobby to a new level, etc etc. However, within 6-9 months, everything went very quiet.

Several years later (again the memory is not good on the exact timing), along came one, Jim Robinson, ex-Soldier (Fusilier), Toy Soldier enthusiast and very successful "Fish & Chip Shop" owner. Jim purchased the entire Rose range from Ceremonial, and announced that he was going to offer "Painted Sets" under the brand name "Fusilier". He later told me that he had consulted Russell about his intentions and had received Russell's "blessing".

I was then running a Mail Order Business, and the prospect of perhaps getting "Rose castigs" was akin to finding the Holy Grail. So I wrote a "pleading" letter asking him to consider offering the castings again.

Jim was inundated with similar requests from around the world. Within a very short time he had Rose Miniatures up and running, using the traditional packaging, etc [it was just like the "old days" Schultz!]

I dealt with Jim for many years thereafter, selling both Fusilier and Rose. When the Marlowes decided to retire, he purchased the entire ranges of Phoenix.

The best selling range of Phoenix, wasn't a TS range at all, but the 1/12th Dolls House furniture. Jim, who was a very astute businessman quickly cottoned on to that, and in a very short time he had sold off everything exect the Doll's House stuff. As far as I know he is still dealing in Doll's House stuff, or maybe he has retired to the South of France??

John Eden bought the entire Rose inventory, and quite a bit else. Originally he offered Rose figures as painted sets (and singles also, I think) as well as castings. In recent years he has dropped the painted ranges. I don't personally know the reason for that, although I would guess that getting reliable, well priced painters, may have been a factor.

I'm sorry, I did say it was a saga. What are the lessons to be learned? First and foremost, I think it shows that good casting ranges can have a very long and useful life. I would venture to say, a longer life than their painted cousins. I am not fully familiar with the AQM range so I don't really know if this applys, but Jim, and later John, I believe, quickly discovered that Rose had some serious gaps in "sets", eg: 10 figures in a set but no drummer, or standard etc. So they had to have one made.

Fusilier were also painted as "well painted toy soldiers", suitable for sale in sets. It would be interesting to see if good castings like Rose and AQM, would sell better if painted to a similar standard as the "modern matte" figures coming out of China? Either as sets or single figures?

Mike, if you can find him, Jim Robinson would be a great bloke to talk to about your intentions.

Happy Collecting, Guys,

Bob
 
Hi

Yes, AQM as in the figures you have shown - the 70/80mm went to a company called Foxwood Figures who were producing them as resin kits.

I have the 54mm figures.

Mike

Hello

My first question will be : is this the same company who produced in the 80ies with logo and boxes like ? :

View attachment 186126

At that time only kit form including the first Chotta Sahib 90mm; I painted 2 of them early 80ies

View attachment 186132 View attachment 186133


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I still have 2 others Chotta in their original packing ... AQM .
Now : I'm basicaly a "painter" not a collector ( matt painting ), so, you're welcome in editing kit form .
Now the thorny question : price; half the price of a painted one seems more than fair compared to actual kitmakers selling at an average 30$ unpainted ( metal) but with a very high level of details .
Perhaps you could propose at first a range of 54mm, same period, same country and see the reaction but remember the market is not the same, there are actualy so many makers ( more than 1000 ) .
Also you could push in the direction of figures made to be painted together for making small dioramas . This seems to be more and more a tendancy with the " toy soldiers" actual makers .

Best
 
Having re-read my original post, I see that I was not clear about uniform guidelines. (Unfortunately, such lapses are all to common for octogenarians!) With so many possible combinations, it would be difficult to package each with the desired instructions. The simple solution would be to have an area on your website with the correct information.

Bosun Al

Sorry, Al, I have to disagree with you once again. It's easy enough to use a card as a backing for the package, and print uniform details on it, or to include some other printed form, in the instructions. Imrie-Risley, Rose Miniatures, Stadden/Tradition, Valiant, Monarch, New Hope Designs, are all makers of castings who did that in one form or another.

I like Imrie-Risley's cards, particularly. The colored postcards are attractive, and the black-and-white line illustrations can be painted up in their own right.

Prost!
Brad
 
Many thanks to everyone for taking the time to reply. And for the detailed replies as well.

My initial hesitation about offering castings was also based on the very poor quality of the AQM moulds - 95% of them are not usable as they require far too much clean up to provide the figures as castings. The horses are either completely shot (cracks in the mould) or they have very big lugs into the bags of the saddle, etc which require a lot of filing, etc to make usable. I have spent a few months playing with the various moulds I have and have come to the conclusion that I am better remaking all of them from scratch. This is obviously a fairly big task and, although I make my own moulds, an additional expense.

There are often comments that if a range is really old it should be sold cheaply - the current owner of Minifigs has been accused of ripping people off because his 25mm figures are priced the same as modern figures. But, as Dave points out, he employs 3 casters and pays them well above the minimum wage. The highest cost in producing figures is labour and even Toy Soldier makers have to eat :)

It would be interesting to hear from someone who only collects and doesn't paint about their view...

I have always painted my own figures and have bought them from Tradition, Asset, etc in the past and very rarely even bought painted wargaming figures; so I get the view of the painters but don't have experience of collecting a painted range.

On of my initial desires for AQM was to promote the selling of complete, painted dioramas (and I have had a few enquiries about Omdurman, etc) and possibly that is a better way to go alongside selling castings...

At the moment I only have the masters for the Colonial and British in India ranges and I would like to get those out and sold to recoup some of my investment before I move on to the other AQM ranges that I can access.

This is giving me a lot of food for thought - I am planning what I am bringing to the April Toy SOldier show in the way of stock (which should include a couple of brand new Colonial artillery pieces and crews) and this is very helpful.

thanks

Mike

Regarding your point about the poor quality of moulds Mike - which I didn't cover in my initial reply.

I - and I'm sure many of my fellow assemblers/painters - are quite good at removing excess flash and fixing errors addition or omissions in castings. IF. like me, they buy used figures on the open market - you quickly realise that things sold there are rarely perfect. There's always usually something to fix.

Hole in the saddle - fill it with milliput. Lump on the saddle, cut it off and file it smooth. There's rarely anything that can't be fixed. I currently have a re-cast of a Knight on the go - using one of Selwyn-Smith's old castings. Lots of flash - as the mould is old. Lots of gaps for the same reason - these are some I did, like that lately. Okay - no Courtney, I know :D- but suits me down to the ground.

The one on the left is the recast SSmith. Central small figure is a converted Doran casting - found second-hand for £1. The lutteral Psalter combo - was inspired by Freddy Ping's Xmas card - and was made from some bits bought from Dorset Soldiers - including a 10pence junk stall find of a Timpo Horse.

I'll go with just about any state - as I can fix most things now - I've had lots of practice with them. Thanks for listening. jb.
 
Regarding your point about the poor quality of moulds Mike - which I didn't cover in my initial reply.

I - and I'm sure many of my fellow assemblers/painters - are quite good at removing excess flash and fixing errors addition or omissions in castings. IF. like me, they buy used figures on the open market - you quickly realise that things sold there are rarely perfect. There's always usually something to fix.

Hole in the saddle - fill it with milliput. Lump on the saddle, cut it off and file it smooth. There's rarely anything that can't be fixed. I currently have a re-cast of a Knight on the go - using one of Selwyn-Smith's old castings. Lots of flash - as the mould is old. Lots of gaps for the same reason - these are some I did, like that lately. Okay - no Courtney, I know :D- but suits me down to the ground.

The one on the left is the recast SSmith. Central small figure is a converted Doran casting - found second-hand for £1. The lutteral Psalter combo - was inspired by Freddy Ping's Xmas card - and was made from some bits bought from Dorset Soldiers - including a 10pence junk stall find of a Timpo Horse.

I'll go with just about any state - as I can fix most things now - I've had lots of practice with them. Thanks for listening. jb.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you reworked a Doran ? Doran-Courtenay made between 1920-1928 estimated value actualy for a simple foot figure is 800 - 1000$
The Courtenay ( working alone then ) cames later 1935 - 1968, then the molds were sold to Ping .

Nowadays : good work ( I agree with you about reworking toysoldiers sometime, I have a friend who bought the entire range of DelPrado Medieval because he liked very much the New Hope Design Men at Arms production, he repainted them with oils, it was far cheaper than looking for Old Kit, or buyig new one, the more for the "on horse")
Best
 
Regarding your point about the poor quality of moulds Mike - which I didn't cover in my initial reply.

I - and I'm sure many of my fellow assemblers/painters - are quite good at removing excess flash and fixing errors addition or omissions in castings. IF. like me, they buy used figures on the open market - you quickly realise that things sold there are rarely perfect. There's always usually something to fix.

Hole in the saddle - fill it with milliput. Lump on the saddle, cut it off and file it smooth. There's rarely anything that can't be fixed. I currently have a re-cast of a Knight on the go - using one of Selwyn-Smith's old castings. Lots of flash - as the mould is old. Lots of gaps for the same reason - these are some I did, like that lately. Okay - no Courtney, I know :D- but suits me down to the ground.

Many thanks for the comments. It will be 10 years this year that I've been making my own moulds and casting figures (and 12 years since I started creating toy soldier ranges for wargaming) and I have developed a certain standard that I expect from my moulds and casting quality. A small amount of flash to clea off with a knife is fine but large lumps of metal and holes to be filled aren't something I am happy with...

I've been experimenting with printing out some photos to include with the figures and looking at a good way to package them so things are progressing...

Mike
 
Many thanks for the comments. It will be 10 years this year that I've been making my own moulds and casting figures (and 12 years since I started creating toy soldier ranges for wargaming) and I have developed a certain standard that I expect from my moulds and casting quality. A small amount of flash to clea off with a knife is fine but large lumps of metal and holes to be filled aren't something I am happy with...

I've been experimenting with printing out some photos to include with the figures and looking at a good way to package them so things are progressing...

Mike

Good to hear Mike. Don't forget that many painter/collectors out there, won't really require painting instructions at all. I have used many converted figures for my own collection - so frequently change poses, limbs, weapons etcetera - as well as going back to sometimes primary and other secondary sources for heraldry and paintwork OTHER THAN that supplied (if any) by the manufacturer. Maybe make the painting instruction optional???

In other words - you might make "The Black Prince" - and supply a pic. - BUT many of us will have other ideas in mind, for what the figure eventually will look like - or represent. That's why I would be particularly interested in any of your Agincourt range - if they were to become available again. As for the quality of the castings - yes - I can see that it might not satisfy you as a vendor - to send out something you're not entirely happy with.

However, that's just MY view - do check them out with others too.

It would be a helpful addition to the existing available castings on the market - and/or older figures now only available on the secondary market - were you to "bring back" many of the old AQM figures ( especially for me, the Agincourt range), which have been sorely missed by many of us. The old pics are still available online too - so painting guides ( if needed) could easily be resurrected, I think.

BUT - you should see some of the stuff that comes my way!{eek3} Sometimes, all that's holding them together - is the old paint and grunge, yet with a bit of very pleasurable work - out pops another Glossy (eventually).

Hurrah! for Milliput. {sm4} and I hope it all works out well for you. If you make 'em again at a reasonable cost - I'm in. jb
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top