Search results

I search the following First Legion Soviet soldiers in the RUSSTAL range : Russtal001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006a, 006b, 008, 010 022 and 039. Thanks ....

I search the Figarti winter T-34/85 EFR-019.

Battle of the Bulge December 1944.

Thanks for your answer but unfortunately it don't work because it depicts an early T34/76 and not a T34/85.

I hope sincerely that FL release a future accurate "1944" T34/85. With some alterations on LGW045 and LWG046, it might be possible : - rounded front fenders in place of squared off. - smaller commander cupola with two part split hatch in place of larger with single hatch. - twin...

For those a little concerned with historical reality, here are some remarks about T34/85 LWG046. FL declines the first T34/85 LWG045 in a winter "February 1944" version but without any alteration. Thus, it results the following inconsistencies : - In first, the actual assignment unit is not...

Hello the staff of Warpark, Very interesting new releases !. The Sturmpanzer IV "Brummbär" early version without zimmerit has a beautifull three tones camouflage scheme and a well done weathering. I guess it is for the Kursk battle with the St. Pz. Abt. 216. By coincidence, there is also the...

Figures based on real wartime photos are always very lifelike in terms of posture, uniform and equipment. I've found this example with 25268 "Waffen SS officer in greatcoat and smock" : 10th SS Panzer Division "Frundsberg" in Galicie Spring 1944.

Yes, but unfortunately all the production is as mine. I wonder why only the three copies of the promotional photo are correct....

I thought it might be an factory error in the placement of the right hand on the arm : the wrist was turned down instead of up. And alas all the production of FPW033 is the same. By the way, what about the three copies of the promotional photo which are in the good position ???? .

Thanks for the feedback but too dangerous in regard of paint chips.

Thanks for the advise. I was thinking of doing this too but I am afraid it will cause immedialely paint chips on the horse's leg ( even gently ). This already happened to me when trying to straighten a horse.

Yes I completely agree, FL is top class in regard of painting and weathering.

Good idea to hide the wrong markings with some weathering. And 899th TD battalion is a good choice for a BOB M-10.

No worries, my enjoyment is still there and I intend to continue my collection. I know the expression you quote, but IMHO most of the problems I talked about are not a search of (an impossible) perfection, but a certain basis of quality.

No obsession at all but simply a hope of having these beautifull FL products with fewer defects and inaccuracies. Being almost the only one to point out the different problems, I know I have the wrong role but I will continue anyway according to necessity. Ultimately, I think collectors would be...

Thanks Medic 314/79th, I almost believed that I was the only one on this forum who was attentive to accuracy !.

Don't worry, I am completely ease up and I will continue if necessary. All these critiques are only intended to inform brands about certain defects in some of their figurines, hoping they can make improvements ( it seems that brands are reading messages on this forum ). I am absolutely not...

Yes there are. I have some tanks from other brands which satisfy me, not "perfect" but with no historical errors. In regard of FL, at the moment I have no tanks of this brand but I don't despair about future releases. I would like to have BB001, BB008 and BB034 but, unfortunately, I missed them.

Effectively, during BOB the 704th Tank Destroyer Battalion was only combat equipped with M-18 Hellcat and not at all with a single M-10. On the other hand, here is a list of Tank Destroyer Battalions which were actually equipped with M-10 during BOB : 629th, 634th, 644th, 654th, 773rd, 803rd...