T
TomB
Guest
Unless K&C wooden aircraft are made from compressed wood in layers the time making them would be a fraction of the time taken for a very detailed plastic kit....they would save cost wise in the manufacturing ..with modern wood working machines I do not think the basic shape of the aircraft would take long...the add on portions would probably cost more than the airframe itself...maybe Andy would like to share a few details on the subject....could you give me the details of the B17...I have several models but a 1/30 scale would be ideal for a dio....I like making detailed aircraft kits .it give an insite into the heart and soul of the real aircraft...cheers TomB...PS...what are Wingnut aircraft...have not heard of themI use models in dioramas and appreciate that they are cheaper and, in my case, free up dollars for greater expenditure on toy soldiers. Having spent a few hours in hobby shops recently after the passage of a couple of decades, I was struck by the range of choice and manufacturers that I had never heard of let alone purchased from. Growing up it was Airfix or Tamiya. Today, however, if a type of Spitfire or a German tank was used anywhere there is a plastic model of it - or at least so it seems to me. Perhaps the plastic modellers have been so spoilt for choice it is difficult to accept the confines of an associated, but different, hobby. I see a 1/32nd plastic kit B-17 is on the market for 299 US. Given that I could not possibly do justice to a model of that quality, the K&C version, though still a financial commitment for a hobby purchase, is not entirely unreasonable ... at least to me. If a TS painter in Australia charges one dollar a mm, which I have been quoted, what would a modeller charge for making the B-17? My father makes Wingnuts aircraft for our dios and they are between 60 and 120 dollars each. Even at ten dollars an hour (which he is not getting if he reads this post!) the cost of the kit is easily dwarfed by his time commitment.