P.S. Some of the ignorant political views expressed in this thread just make me shake my head about the future of the human race and planet earth. Please stop, you're making my brain hurt.
CS,
Your restraint is admirable, but not as much fun.
Ray
P.S. Some of the ignorant political views expressed in this thread just make me shake my head about the future of the human race and planet earth. Please stop, you're making my brain hurt.
I bow to your superior first-hand experience Jeff. However, I must ask, have you ever painted 50 sets of the same figures before? It seems logical to me anyway, that if you have to paint 50 sets of figures, and in one case those 50 sets are made up entirely of the same glossy marching figure, and in another case there are 4 differently posed and painted matte figures in the set, then it will take a contracted painter (who may not have extensive previous experience painting toy soldiers) much longer to paint the matte figures simply because they must memorize and master 4 different poses and paint schemes versus just one type of marching guy. Hence leading to lower productivity and higher total labour costs for matte sets (likewise for any glossy company that uses multiple poses/uniforms in a single set). It might not be a significant difference but it must have some effect. Perhaps once you get good at painting them, the time difference is identical, but it seems to me the greater the number of poses and variety of uniforms (e.g. SS camo), the higher the initial learning curve.
Now maybe where it gets tricky, is in a case like Beau Geste with a large variety of sets available, where a single painter gets to repeat a marching pose 6 times, but only does a small run of that set before being forced to move on to a completely different set, and having to learn its intricacies, and so on. Once again, I say there must be a far greater economy of scale benefit to K&C getting to do 1000 copies of a particular set.
Andy was talking about high labor costs in China when compared to Chinese wages just a few years ago. Between 2001 and 2007, wages have basically doubled in China. This fact can be confirmed by a simple internet search. Moreover, the average hourly wage in Guangdong province, which I think is the location of most of K&C's factories, is about 66 US cents per hour or double the national Chinese average of 38 US cents per hour. At an hourly wage of 66 cents per hour, you can understand why many manufacturing jobs have moved to China. Even though the average hourly wage has drastically increased, China still has one of the lowest average hourly wages in the world for skilled labor. Bangladesh has a lower hourly wage at 19 cents per hour but lacks the skilled artisans to produce the quality of toy soldier expected by many collectors.... Andy has now confirmed that with another excuse - high labor costs! In China no less where all the manufacturing jobs were moved by businesses like KC to begin with. So many jobs have been exported we have apparently created a labor shortage. So prices must rise, rise, rise ...
While it would save a little on metal alloy costs, the bulk of the figure's cost is sculpting, cleaning the castings and painting.Is it possible that if K&C converted to a smaller 1/32 scale, that it would reduce prices a little?
Regarding K&C I believe that figures are painted by a team, each one responsible for a certain area of the figure, which is then passed to the next painter who adds their colours and so on until completion.
Regards
Jeff
With all due respect, I do not think the basic economies of scale apply since K&C does not make a large enough number in a regular figure production run to enjoy this economic advantage. I believe the average K&C production number is about 800 to 1000 sets (they do make more of certain sets). The present back orders for certain figures like the LAH sailors suggests that some figures are done in even smaller production runs like 200 to 500 figures. We see that when K&C produces production runs of 20,000 units of a single figure for Del Prado, with a total order at one time of half a million figures that there is cost savings since these figures can basically be given away with a publication. We also see the economies of scale enjoyed by FOV and 21st Century which makes hundreds of thousands of units and can sell tanks for $21.Sorry, this doesn't make sense according to economics. Basic economies of scale mean that the more of anything you produce, the cheaper they will be on a per unit basis, so mass produced figures by K&C should in theory be cheaper than those offered by smaller companies, especially out of the cottage market in the UK. Mass production and economies of scale was the fundamental founding principle of the industrial revolution and that's why today most things are produced by large corporations (in China) instead of one person artisans in western countries.
I did not state that any of the named manufacturers offered relatively inexpensive or "cheap" figures. I was responding to comments by Forum members that compared K&C's prices per figure to those of Figarti and Beau Geste and questioning why these manufacturers were selling sets at a lower price per figure. I do agree that all toy soldiers are getting more expensive.Nevertheless, I would hardly hold Figarti or Beau Geste up as manufacturers offering "cheap" figures. Look at the new Figarti $230 V2 halftrack for evidence of a staggeringly expensive (overpriced?) set.
WELLLLL! Maybe if cost keeps going up in China and the dollar keeeps going down. Perhaps we will soon be able to bring production back to a ..
MADE IN THE U S A/U K Tag again??
O.C.
I heard Michael Moore is trying to get Andy to move all of the production of K&C to Flint MI....its just what I heard!