Thanks Mikeabsolutely love them!
Thanks Jeff, yes the Barzso cannon is I think one of the best made in 54mm.Superb finish as usual Mike!......really like the cannon. {bravo}}
Jeff :salute::
Great paint job as usual!
The hard part is getting the man thumbing the vent in there. I haven't figured it out yet with my Alamo gun crew.
View attachment 178246
thAnother fine example of your painting skills.The gun is very well done.The barrel is most realistic.I am not familiar with either Barzso or Conte plastic figures,but I imagine they are 54mm? Your painting really brings these figures to life.Again,well done that man.
Thanks for clarifying, I wasn't quite sure what that guy was supposed to be doing !
Mike
The hard part is getting the man thumbing the vent in there. I haven't figured it out yet with my Alamo gun crew.
View attachment 178246
I was always curious that Conte made alamo cannon crew figures, but not the actual cannon, never seen one. !I haven't found a cannon that fits the figure. I guess I need Mr. Conte's offering.
What's the guy in the blue vest doing? Maybe supposed to be holding onto a wheel, manhandling the piece?
Not exactly sure, I think he's just in mid move, as you suggest manhandling the piece into position.
I was always curious that Conte made alamo cannon crew figures, but not the actual cannon, never seen one. !
Try putting "blue vest" and "green shirt" on the left side of the gun. They act at the #5 man bringing the shot from the limber chest and # 2 man who places the shot on the muzzle. #5 passing to # 2. View attachment 178404
If the Alamo men drilled more to the earlier drill (makes sense) "green shirt" is # 4 servant ammunition man and "blue vest" is # 1.
View attachment 178405
As it's unlikely the Alamo men had limbers, what ever magazine they used would be "green shirt's" position.
Yeah, after I posted, it occurred to me that blue-vest might be receiving the round from green-shirt. Course, the diagrams show regulation crews, which weren't always available in the field (or included in toy soldier sets) - sometimes crew members had to double-up on their tasks.
During my thirteen years in the US Army Field Artillery I worked three different gun systems - the M110 8-inch howitzer SP, the M114 155mm How, towed; and the M102 105mm How, towed (my personal favorite) - I don't ever remember having a full section to man those guns - but we made do as you said. Add to the shortage of personnel, troops detached for perimeter guard and other tasks and it put us even more short-handed. The only guys we really needed other than the Chief, Gunner, and A/G out of an authorized 10-13 man crew were two to three men to handle the ammo and an RTO.
After Gallant Eagle 82, which was the worst parachute disaster in 82nd Abn history some of our gun crews were down to two or three men due to injuries. They still did the job for an almost two week exercise.
I hope this adds some perspective.