Civil War Book Review - Summer Edition (1 Viewer)

jazzeum

Four Star General
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
38,439
The Civil War Book Review, a quarterly journal published by Louisiana State University, has released its Summer 2011 issue, which is available at www.cwbr.com. I highly recommend this site for anyone interested in the Civil War.

I received the following via email:

*****

The Civil War Sesquicentennial provides us with the opportunity for reassessment; the next four years should encourage and inspire us to look, once again, at the Civil War and the soldiers and civilians who endured those four long years. 146 years beyond Appomattox, it can be difficult, at times, for modern Civil War historians to approach and truly understand the war and the wartime generation. It’s often easier to examine the heroic aspects that have embellished our memory of the war but we must always remain cognizant that these four years changed the course of United States history, and every single person living in this country during that period found themselves affected by the conflict. We must remember that the soldiers were not simply pawns on a map moving from place to place under the influence of some higher unseen power, devoid of any human emotion. The Sesquicentennial years provide a chance for us to truly look at the people who took part in the war or, perhaps telling us just as much, those who preferred to stand on the sidelines. But, at the end of the day, human actors played a part in the drama of the Civil War, influencing its outcome while being altered tremendously by their experience.

This summer we have a photograph of a young Confederate, Private John White, of a Virginia regiment, who, again, reminds us of the ever-present human side of those who endured the Civil War.

This issue of Civil War Book Review highlights several works of new scholarship that help us to look at the war and wartime generation, providing a new way of understanding the human reality of the war. Robert Cook’s Civil War Senator: William Pitt Fessenden and the Fight to Save the American Republic reminds us of the antebellum years, leading up to the secession crisis, when the war seemed a looming, but not necessarily present, cloud on the horizon. Cook reminds us of the role that individual politicians played in navigating the tenuous years leading up to the war. Adam Goodheart explores, in 1861: The Civil War Awakening, the ways in which society stood up and recognized the reality of war during the first year by highlighting specific historical figures. These characters confronted the war, forced to feel their way through the uncertainty, in an effort to find their role during the course of the war. In A World On Fire: Britain’s Crucial Role in the American Civil War, Amanda Foreman explores the drama that played out in the game of international politics wherein countless people interpreted the war and its course, influencing whether or not Great Britain would recognize the Confederacy or maintain friendly relations with the United States and Abraham Lincoln. Finally, several essays, collected and edited by Susannah J. Ural explores how important groups within society experienced a war that significantly altered the notion of citizenship for ethnic and racial groups both North and South. Civil War Citizens: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity in America’s Bloodiest Conflict reminds us how deeply the Civil War affected all of American society as individuals sought to understand their role within this momentous event.

Professor Gary Gallagher graciously accepted an invitation to speak with Civil War Book Review about his new book, The Union War. Gallagher goes to great lengths to detail the concept of the word “Union” and what the war meant to the wartime generation. Furthering our understand of the actual people on the ground who deemed it necessary to don a uniform and risk death to fight during the war, Gallagher makes great strides to explain why Union soldiers chose to fight and how they described and remembered their experience.

We are thrilled to add a new element to Civil War Book Review in honor of the Civil War Sesquicentennial this quarter. Our new column, which will feature a different topic in each issue over the next four years, will seek to provide a pulse on the current historiography of that topic while providing some new avenues where we might need to push the scholarship or explore further. We hope that our readers will find this column useful with their own studies and understanding of some complicated topics. Our first installment features historian Russell McClintock who has written a fine piece on secession; we hope that the readers of Civil War Book Review enjoy this column and those to come in the future.

We also have a new columnist moving forward. Michael Taylor will be following in the footsteps of Leah Wood Jewett who has decided to hand over the reins to Mr. Taylor. We thank Leah, very much, for her insightful columns over the past years while we look forward to what Michael Taylor has in store for us. This quarter, he has chosen to introduce a new set of letters in the LSU Special Collections that highlight blockades and blockade runners in the area around Lake Ponchartrain in Louisiana, opening up new opportunities to explore a topic that has often been forgotten.

As always, we would like to acknowledge that the very difficult task of putting a scholarly journal online every three months would not be possible if it were not for the constant support of the staffs of both LSU Libraries and Special Collections. We thank them, very much, for their continued support as well as the support of our publishers, reviewers, and you-the readers.

Civil War Book Review is published in the first week of the months of February, May, August, and November. If you would like to receive e-mail reminders of upcoming issues and special features on the website, click on “Sign me up for CWBR Updates!” link at the bottom of any page in the journal. From there, you can provide us with your contact information so that you will receive these e-mail reminders. Of course, we will NEVER share your personal information with any third party.

Civil War Book Review is the journal of record for new or newly reprinted books about the antebellum, Civil War, and Reconstruction eras, and is a project of the United States Civil War Center, LSU Libraries Special Collections. A reader’s survey can be accessed through the CWBR homepage.
 
The lastest edition of the Civil War Book Review is now available, cwbr.com

Here is the email I recieved.

****

The Civil War Book Review, a quarterly journal published by the LSU Libraries’ Special Collections Division, has released its Fall 2012 issue at www.cwbr.com.

Intellectually, I understood that a large number of books were published about the Civil War every year. I also realized that with this being the sesquicentennial of the conflict, even more books were being released now. But, now that I have taken over the editorship of the Civil War Book Review and I have seen the piles of books being published about the conflict still filling my office, it is staggering.

This avalanche of scholarship shows just how vital research into the war is, and this issue of the Review displays this in wonderful detail. From new looks at many traditional military and political aspects of the war, to new topics that are just now coming to light, the scholarship of the Civil War period has never been better or more varied.

Gretchen Long’s new work, Doctoring Freedom: The Politics of African American Medical Care in Slavery and Emancipation, is the subject of this issues Author Interview, and is a perfect example of how new subjects are constantly being explored. Dr. Long’s work delves into an area of that has not been well studied, the importance of medical care as an expression of freedom and independence for slaves and freedmen before, during, and after the war.


Our featured reviews this issue cover a wide variety of traditional and non-traditional aspects of the period, blazing new trails to future study. Caleb Smith’s, The Oracle and the Curse: A Poetics of Justice from the Revolution to the Civil War, explores how trials and legal writings effected other forms of literature and popular culture, giving a unique look at the time leading up to the Civil War.

The Best Station of them All: The Savannah Squadron, 1861-1865
, by Maurice Mellon, looks at a neglected part of naval history, individual squadron histories of the Confederate Navy. Harry Laver takes a new look at Ulysses S. Grant to show how he grew as a leader from his earliest days in the Army to Appomattox in The Leadership of Ulysses S. Grant: A General Who Will Fight. Finally is a volume that explores the impact of T. Harry Williams, the eminent historian of the war who not only was a great scholar, but a great teacher, in, Lee and His Generals: Essays in Honor of T. Harry Williams, edited by Lawrence Lee Hewitt and Thomas E. Schott.

Beyond the reviews featured this issue, Michael Taylor continues his excellent column of Civil War Treasures, focusing on how Southerners filled the gaps in education without access to northern book publishers. While the Sesquicentennial Column features a review of the current standing of the military history of the Civil War by Earl Hess, an expert in the field.

As I take over the Review I would be remiss if I did not thank all of the authors, publishers, and reviewers that make a publication like this possible and highly enjoyable to work at. Thank you for all of your time and effort which continues to drive forward our understanding of this complex period in American history.
 
During the recent Gettysburg events, one of the historians referenced the books of Joseph Harsh as the definitive account on Antietam. I've never read or heard of him. Anyone read his books? Taken at the Flood; Confederate Tide Rising.
 
During the recent Gettysburg events, one of the historians referenced the books of Joseph Harsh as the definitive account on Antietam. I've never read or heard of him. Anyone read his books? Taken at the Flood; Confederate Tide Rising.
Used to have his books, which were pretty popular with the ACW crowd I knew, but I never got to read them before dismantling my collection. If I remember correctly, they were supposed to be outstanding in terms of Southern military policy and strategy. Don't know if it is a true battle history. Harsh passed away in 2010. -- Al
 
During the recent Gettysburg events, one of the historians referenced the books of Joseph Harsh as the definitive account on Antietam. I've never read or heard of him. Anyone read his books? Taken at the Flood; Confederate Tide Rising.

I have read Confederate Tide Rising by Harsh which concentrates on Lee and Jeff Davis' keenness for an offensive rather than defensive strategy for the South-But I would say it is most definitely not a book for the casual reader. I have not read his Antietam tome as I felt, that based on his previous book, it would lean too much to the Southern view rather than a holistic account of the battle. There are far better equipped scholars of the ACW than me, however, in my humble opinion the Battle of Antietam was the most chaotic and is subsequently the most difficult clash of arms for any student of the war to get a good grasp of. Gettysburg has always grabbed the headlines and the unusually extended three days of the battle has been well documented and is much easier to comprehend than the single bloodiest day in American history.

As Allen Guelzo states in his new and excellent book The Last Invasion- Pinning down the facts of any 19th century ACW battle is difficult and a number of caveats need to be applied. America in the 1860s knew nothing about synchronised time. Clocks and watches were set by light and dark or by the sound of church bells or public clocks. The participants themselves tried to establish some rough sense of timing of the battle's events. However, the bloody events of September 17th 1862 which we believe began at 5.30 in the morning was followed by 12 full hours of almost non-stop fighting. Apart from the main events of the Cornfield; Bloody Lane and Burnside's Bridge, infantry, artillery and cavalry clashes were taking place in practically every corner of the Sharpsburg farmlands and all at the same time resulting in complete mayhem and chaos. And 23,000 casualties later- at approximately 5.30 in the afternoon- everyone was just about were they were 12 hours earlier wondering what had actually happened during that terrible day.

Landscape Turned Red by Sears is the very best account I have read of untangling the chaotic events of those 12 bloody hours at Antietam but maybe and referring to your post I should take a look at Professor Harsh's version of events.
 
I also really liked Landscape Turned Red. An earlier work, The Gleam of Bayonets by Murfin, is also very good. It was Murfin's book, read way back when I was young and dapper, that opened my eyes to the human side in terms of numbers involved. It gave me a feel for regimental sized engagements, with their small numbers, as opposed to the general battle involving tens of thousands. Specifically, I was impressed by the Toombs stand at Burnside's Bridge.
I don't believe the Harsh book is a detailed battle history. It is a strategic history of Lee and his approach to the campaign itself. I believe, if my memory serves me, that only one or two chapters of the entire book are devoted to the actions at South Mountain and Sharpsburg. That said, the book is supposed to be the best about the whole situation and the events leading up to the invasion/battle. -- Al
 
Last edited:
As we are now discussing some works on Antietam, there are a couple other new titles that should be considered. I reviewed them in another thread but they are worth mentioning here. The first is "The Maps of Antietam: An Atlas of the Antietam (Sharpsburg) Campaign, Including the Battle of South Mountain, September 2 - 20, 1862" by Bradley Gottfried. This book is superb, in the spirit of Gottfried's other 'Map' books and should be in the library of every Antietam enthusiast. The other work is a 2 volume history of the Maryland campaign titled (oddly enough), "The Maryland Campaign of September 1862": Vol.1: South Mountain and Vol.2: Antietam by Ezra Carmen. The 2 volumes total 1187 pages. The author was a NJ ACW vet who was a member of the Antietam Battlefield Board. This is a very complete and professional history of the campaign. Both the mentioned titles are published by Savas Beatie. -- Al
 
Al,

Do you have Gottfried's book on Gettysburg. Heard it's pretty good.

Brad
 
Al,

Do you have Gottfried's book on Gettysburg. Heard it's pretty good.

Brad
Hi Brad. Yes, I have the Gettysburg book. It is tremendous, not to overstate it. Marvelous job. I have found all of the Gottfried books to be very useful. Along with his various map books, I found his book, Brigades of Gettysburg, to be very useful. -- Al
 
I also really liked Landscape Turned Red. An earlier work, The Gleam of Bayonets by Murfin, is also very good. It was Murfin's book, read way back when I was young and dapper, that opened my eyes to the human side in terms of numbers involved. It gave me a feel for regimental sized engagements, with their small numbers, as opposed to the general battle involving tens of thousands. Specifically, I was impressed by the Toombs stand at Burnside's Bridge.
I don't believe the Harsh book is a detailed battle history. It is a strategic history of Lee and his approach to the campaign itself. I believe, if my memory serves me, that only one or two chapters of the entire book are devoted to the actions at South Mountain and Sharpsburg. That said, the book is supposed to be the best about the whole situation and the events leading up to the invasion/battle. -- Al

I could be wrong, but my understanding is that Harsh has written at least three books on the campaign. "Confederate Tide Rising" sounds like the book you note regarding Southern strategy. "Taken at the Flood" seems focused on the military campaign. I'm about 50 books in the behind right now and likely won't get to these for some time.
 
I could be wrong, but my understanding is that Harsh has written at least three books on the campaign. "Confederate Tide Rising" sounds like the book you note regarding Southern strategy. "Taken at the Flood" seems focused on the military campaign. I'm about 50 books in the behind right now and likely won't get to these for some time.
I believe the book Taken at the Flood is the book I described. I think the Confederate Tide Rising covers the period up to Taken at the Flood. I owned, but didn't get to read these books but I do remember that Taken at the Flood was not a detailed battle history, but more of a strategy and policy related work about Antietam. Harsh also did a third book related to Antietam which I never owned but I think it is a compendium, again, not a battle history. Maybe someone who has actually read these can shed some light for us? -- Al
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top