FirstLegion
Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,906
Not sure if this movie has been discussed, but I just saw it tonight and really enjoyed it. Great stuff. Highly recommend it to everyone.
"The rush of battle is a potent and often lethal addiction, for war is a drug".OK, I'll ask. What is the "Hurt Locker" about. Never heard of it. -- Lancer
Thanks for the info. -- Al"The rush of battle is a potent and often lethal addiction, for war is a drug".
The movie is based on the story of a US Army Bomb Squad during the Iraq War written by a Jounalist imbedded with such a unit. It looks interesting and has received many good reviews.
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809914561/trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GxSDZc8etg
It actually has a 98% score on Rotten Tomatoes.com which is just unheard of as to how high that is on that website. It's an independent film (though looks big budget when you watch it) and just really really good. There is already quite a bit of Oscar buzz about it already for the film, director, and lead actor. The movie essentially looks at the paradigm between living in a situation where you could die at any moment and how it can become an addiction to the point where living without it is equally unbearable. The element that I like best about the movie is that it has a great pace to it and there isn't much down time. Rather they explore these types of themes in the action itself rather than through lots of reflection or other methods. As I said before, I can't recommend it highly enough.
Thanks to Wayne I watched this last night.
Good movie but not one that would do well in the cinemas. For most of the movie I was trying to remember where I had seen the main actor, Jenner, from and then remembered it was the bad cop in the SWAT movie.
If the guys they met in the desert were supposed to be British SAS then all I can say is that they were fairly inactive compared to the US EOD guys in that engagement with the bad guys.
Regards
Brett
Im with you Matt no way they where SASI was wondering about the guys they met in the desert myself. I don't think they were British SAS or even currently in any military, on the contrary, they were mercenaries/private bounty hunters. The reason I think so is a) because they weren't very good and b) because when Ralph Fiennes runs after the guys who are escaping and shoots them he comments on them being worth 500,000 pounds to them "dead or alive."
Best,
Matt
I was wondering about the guys they met in the desert myself. I don't think they were British SAS or even currently in any military, on the contrary, they were mercenaries/private bounty hunters. The reason I think so is a) because they weren't very good and b) because when Ralph Fiennes runs after the guys who are escaping and shoots them he comments on them being worth 500,000 pounds to them "dead or alive."
Best,
\\\\
Matt
Well that is likely one of the cheaper aspects of the war; the total cost per "kill" is considerably higher.500 000 quid a scalp.
No wonder the war went over budget.