July 27th, 2020 News Update (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
jjDESIGNS 27[SUP]th[/SUP] JULY 2020 NEWS UPDATE
KNIGHTS OF THE SKIES
ROLAND CIIa AND CREW

The LFG Roland C.II, usually known as the Walfisch (Whale), was an advanced German reconnaissance aircraft of World War I. It was manufactured by Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft G.m.b.H.
LFG, later changed their name to Roland to avoid confusion with LVG (Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft).
They were responsible for some of the most aerodynamic and innovative aircraft designs of the Great War. The “Walfisch” was designed as aerodynamically as possible at the time, which resulted in a smooth fuselage featuring many compound curves and mounting the top wings to the fuselage to avoid drag from the struts.

KOS01-M.jpg


The C.II had much lower drag than comparable aircraft of its time. It featured a monocoque fuselage built with an outer skin of two layers of thin plywood strips at an angle to each other (known as a Wickelrumpf, or "wrapped body" design)
This had both lower drag and better strength per weight than typical aircraft of the time, but it was relatively slow and expensive to build. (This approach was further developed in the de Havilland Mosquito of World War II.) The deep fuselage completely filled the vertical gap between the wing panel center sections, eliminating any need for cabane struts commonly used in biplanes, and gave the aircraft its "whale" nickname. Struts and wires were reduced, without suffering the weight penalty of cantilever wings, like those used on the pioneering all-metal Junkers J 1 of late 1915. There was even some attempt to flair the wings into the fuselage, to eliminate dead air space, a feature prominently missing from the Schneider Trophy contestants of the following decade. The engineer in charge of the design was Tantzen, who was a student of Ludwig Prandtl, the founder of mathematical aerodynamics and the one to introduce the concept of boundary layer.

The C.II was powered by a single 160 hp (120 kW) Mercedes D III, providing a top speed of 165 km/h (103 mph), a ceiling of 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) and an endurance of four hours.

KOS02-M.jpg


As well as the two crewmen discussing their flight plan, in the pipeline are also two action crew for the plane. These will be sold separately, and will be suitable for the ACE-50 as well as the new ‘fishscale’ version.

KOS03-M.jpg


The C.II entered service in the spring of 1916. Operationally, handling was reported as difficult but performance was relatively good. Due to the crew positions with eyes above the upper wing, upward visibility was excellent, but downward visibility was poor. It was also used in a fighter escort role and had a crew of two, pilot and observer/gunner.
Because of its speed, when it was first introduced, it could be intercepted only from above. Because of the lack of downward visibility, it was best attacked by diving below and coming up at it
Albert Ball, whose first victim was a C.II, said in the latter half of 1916 that it was "the best German machine now".

It was flown by a number of famous German aces including The Red Baron,, Manfred Von Richthofen.

KOS04-M.jpg



SOME THOUGHTS FROM JOHN

This will be the second jjdesigns version of the Roland CIIa.
The “fish scale” decoration is probably the most iconic paint scheme for this model, as it echo’s its “Walfisch” nickname.

The previous Roland CIIa (ACE-50), was the last Knights of the Skies release, and this was over two years ago in June 2018!

A change in the Hong Kong postal service package sizes have meant I have had to re-think how to proceed with releases.
We have been busy, two of the older models have now been re-tooled and I hope to be able to release new versions as well as a few old favorites in the next six months.


KOS05-M.jpg


This new re-tooled Fokker Dr 1 was especially requested by Al (Lancer), and will probably be one of the first new Knights of The Skies models to be released.


KOS06-M.jpg


2021 will see the release of at least two new allied planes.

Best wishes
john jenkins
 
Beautiful new releases! I’m really happy to see the upcoming crew figures for the Rolland C.II.A and especially the retooled Fokker DR1! I’m missing a DR1 from my collection so I’m really happy to see one will be available soon 😎
 
[font=&amp]jjdesigns 27[sup]th[/sup] july 2020 news update[/font]
[font=&amp]knights of the skies[/font]
[font=&amp]roland ciia and crew[/font]

[font=&amp]the lfg roland c.ii, usually known as the walfisch (whale), was an advanced german reconnaissance aircraft of [/font][font=&amp]world war i[/font][font=&amp]. It was manufactured by [/font][font=&amp]luft-fahrzeug-gesellschaft g.m.b.h.[/font]
[font=&amp]lfg, later changed their name to roland to avoid confusion with lvg (luft-verkehrs-gesellschaft). [/font]
[font=&amp]they were responsible for some of the most aerodynamic and innovative aircraft designs of the great war. The “walfisch” was designed as aerodynamically as possible at the time, which resulted in a smooth fuselage featuring many compound curves and mounting the top wings to the fuselage to avoid drag from the struts.[/font]

[font=&amp]
kos01-m.jpg
[/font]

[font=&amp]the c.ii had much lower drag than comparable aircraft of its time. It featured a [/font][font=&amp]monocoque[/font][font=&amp] fuselage built with an outer skin of two layers of thin plywood strips at an angle to each other (known as a wickelrumpf, or "wrapped body" design)[/font]
[font=&amp]this had both lower drag and better strength per weight than typical aircraft of the time, but it was relatively slow and expensive to build. (this approach was further developed in the [/font][font=&amp]de havilland mosquito[/font][font=&amp] of world war ii.) the deep fuselage completely filled the vertical gap between the wing panel center sections, eliminating any need for [/font][font=&amp]cabane struts commonly used in biplanes, and gave the aircraft its "whale" nickname. Struts and wires were reduced, without suffering the weight penalty of cantilever wings, like those used on the pioneering all-metal [/font][font=&amp]junkers j 1[/font][font=&amp] of late 1915. There was even some attempt to flair the wings into the fuselage, to eliminate dead air space, a feature prominently missing from the [/font][font=&amp]schneider trophy[/font][font=&amp] contestants of the following decade. The engineer in charge of the design was tantzen, who was a student of [/font][font=&amp]ludwig prandtl[/font][font=&amp], the founder of mathematical aerodynamics and the one to introduce the concept of [/font][font=&amp]boundary layer[/font][font=&amp].[/font]

[font=&amp]the c.ii was powered by a single 160 hp (120 kw) [/font][font=&amp]mercedes d iii[/font][font=&amp], providing a top speed of 165 km/h (103 mph), a ceiling of 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) and an endurance of four hours.[/font]

[font=&amp]
kos02-m.jpg
[/font]

[font=&amp]as well as the two crewmen discussing their flight plan, in the pipeline are also two action crew for the plane. These will be sold separately, and will be suitable for the ace-50 as well as the new ‘fishscale’ version.[/font]

kos03-m.jpg


[font=&amp]the c.ii entered service in the spring of 1916. Operationally, handling was reported as difficult but performance was relatively good. Due to the crew positions with eyes above the upper wing, upward visibility was excellent, but downward visibility was poor. It was also used in a fighter escort role and had a crew of two, pilot and observer/gunner.[/font]
[font=&amp]because of its speed, when it was first introduced, it could be intercepted only from above. Because of the lack of downward visibility, it was best attacked by diving below and coming up at it[/font]
[font=&amp]albert ball[/font][font=&amp], whose first victim was a c.ii, said in the latter half of 1916 that it was "the best german machine now".[/font]

[font=&amp]it was flown by a number of famous german aces including the red baron,, manfred von richthofen.[/font]

[font=&amp]
kos04-m.jpg
[/font]


[font=&amp]some thoughts from john[/font]

[font=&amp]this will be the second jjdesigns version of the roland ciia.[/font]
[font=&amp]the “fish scale” decoration is probably the most iconic paint scheme for this model, as it echo’s its “[/font][font=&amp]walfisch[/font][font=&amp]” nickname.[/font]

[font=&amp]the previous roland ciia (ace-50), was the last knights of the skies release, and this was over two years ago in june 2018! [/font]

[font=&amp]a change in the hong kong postal service package sizes have meant i have had to re-think how to proceed with releases.[/font]
[font=&amp]we have been busy, two of the older models have now been re-tooled and i hope to be able to release new versions as well as a few old favorites in the next six months.[/font]


[font=&amp]
kos05-m.jpg
[/font]

[font=&amp]this new re-tooled fokker dr 1 was especially requested by al (lancer), and will probably be one of the first new knights of the skies models to be released. [/font]

[font=&amp]
kos06-m.jpg

[/font]
[font=&amp]2021 will see the release of at least two new allied planes.[/font]

[font=&amp]best wishes[/font]
[font=&amp]john jenkins[/font]
can't wait, bothof these look excellent
 
jjDESIGNS 27[SUP]th[/SUP] JULY 2020 NEWS UPDATE
KNIGHTS OF THE SKIES
ROLAND CIIa AND CREW

The LFG Roland C.II, usually known as the Walfisch (Whale), was an advanced German reconnaissance aircraft of World War I. It was manufactured by Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft G.m.b.H.
LFG, later changed their name to Roland to avoid confusion with LVG (Luft-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft).
They were responsible for some of the most aerodynamic and innovative aircraft designs of the Great War. The “Walfisch” was designed as aerodynamically as possible at the time, which resulted in a smooth fuselage featuring many compound curves and mounting the top wings to the fuselage to avoid drag from the struts.

KOS01-M.jpg


The C.II had much lower drag than comparable aircraft of its time. It featured a monocoque fuselage built with an outer skin of two layers of thin plywood strips at an angle to each other (known as a Wickelrumpf, or "wrapped body" design)
This had both lower drag and better strength per weight than typical aircraft of the time, but it was relatively slow and expensive to build. (This approach was further developed in the de Havilland Mosquito of World War II.) The deep fuselage completely filled the vertical gap between the wing panel center sections, eliminating any need for cabane struts commonly used in biplanes, and gave the aircraft its "whale" nickname. Struts and wires were reduced, without suffering the weight penalty of cantilever wings, like those used on the pioneering all-metal Junkers J 1 of late 1915. There was even some attempt to flair the wings into the fuselage, to eliminate dead air space, a feature prominently missing from the Schneider Trophy contestants of the following decade. The engineer in charge of the design was Tantzen, who was a student of Ludwig Prandtl, the founder of mathematical aerodynamics and the one to introduce the concept of boundary layer.

The C.II was powered by a single 160 hp (120 kW) Mercedes D III, providing a top speed of 165 km/h (103 mph), a ceiling of 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) and an endurance of four hours.

KOS02-M.jpg


As well as the two crewmen discussing their flight plan, in the pipeline are also two action crew for the plane. These will be sold separately, and will be suitable for the ACE-50 as well as the new ‘fishscale’ version.

KOS03-M.jpg


The C.II entered service in the spring of 1916. Operationally, handling was reported as difficult but performance was relatively good. Due to the crew positions with eyes above the upper wing, upward visibility was excellent, but downward visibility was poor. It was also used in a fighter escort role and had a crew of two, pilot and observer/gunner.
Because of its speed, when it was first introduced, it could be intercepted only from above. Because of the lack of downward visibility, it was best attacked by diving below and coming up at it
Albert Ball, whose first victim was a C.II, said in the latter half of 1916 that it was "the best German machine now".

It was flown by a number of famous German aces including The Red Baron,, Manfred Von Richthofen.

KOS04-M.jpg



SOME THOUGHTS FROM JOHN

This will be the second jjdesigns version of the Roland CIIa.
The “fish scale” decoration is probably the most iconic paint scheme for this model, as it echo’s its “Walfisch” nickname.

The previous Roland CIIa (ACE-50), was the last Knights of the Skies release, and this was over two years ago in June 2018!

A change in the Hong Kong postal service package sizes have meant I have had to re-think how to proceed with releases.
We have been busy, two of the older models have now been re-tooled and I hope to be able to release new versions as well as a few old favorites in the next six months.


KOS05-M.jpg


This new re-tooled Fokker Dr 1 was especially requested by Al (Lancer), and will probably be one of the first new Knights of The Skies models to be released.


KOS06-M.jpg


2021 will see the release of at least two new allied planes.

Best wishes
john jenkins
All right, John. The Voss tripe makes it's appearance. Love it and I really like the fish-scale finish on the Roland, plus the action filled crewman to go with it. Been a long wait for new KotS but it sure is worth it. -- Al
 
Beautiful new releases! I’m really happy to see the upcoming crew figures for the Rolland C.II.A and especially the retooled Fokker DR1! I’m missing a DR1 from my collection so I’m really happy to see one will be available soon 😎

KOS06-M.jpg


KOS05-M.jpg


Tristan is correct about the Fokker being retooled. For instance, the weapons appear to have nice gunsights on them, PE, perhaps. Also, the cockpit has been upgraded. Looks like a nice improvement over the previous seven. Now, we have two of Voss' planes. Excellent.

-Moe
 
See if I can't get some bigger versions of the tripe pics in here:

115874204-3449672815043604-1392227299429120663-o.jpg


115936138-3449672781710274-975917417052848975-o.jpg


Note the cockpit and weapons rendering. Also, there's a compass on the right cabane strut. Overall, the surface detail and parts definition appears improved. Perhaps an upgraded MvR version will appear...someday!

-Moe
 
I am definitely getting the new LFG Roland C.II and the crew when it comes out. This will be my 11th JJD warbird, and they are all excellent!:salute::
 
Really like the Voss triplane. It is an aircraft that I have wanted for a long time. John has apparently opted for the factory camo version, meaning that he has decided that the cowling should be the Fokker factory dark green, with the Voss kite face applied to it. There is a possibility that the cowling was painted in the color of yellow, the ID color of Jasta 10, Voss' Jasta. Since the film used in WW1 tended to turn yellow into a dark appearance in the B/W photos of the time, this has developed into a running argument with no real definite answer. There are apparently no written records that describe the Voss tripe, thus photo interpretation is the only option and this will not provide the final answer because yellow and dark green both appear the same tonal value in the pictures. This would also hold true for the tire discs, which show dark in period photos. At any rate, there is no final answer to the question of yellow or green for the cowling so one is as good as the other. Just happy to have a Voss triplane in the future. -- Al
 
Excellent news. I figured John was done with triplanes. That will be landing at my house.
 
BRILLIANT , This made my day. {sm4}{sm4}

So Happy to hear they will be continuing with this line, I've been really down thinking it was another casualty of WWII.

I hope they will also redo a German hanger piece as well, I missed that one and have been kicking myself in the *** for having done so. Just absolutely love this line.

Just received Bronnenkant's Boelcke book from him and would love to see a series of his planes made as a tribute , who knows maybe down the road at some point. Anyway just FANTASTIC news that this line lives on.
 
BRILLIANT , This made my day. {sm4}{sm4}

So Happy to hear they will be continuing with this line, I've been really down thinking it was another casualty of WWII.

I hope they will also redo a German hanger piece as well, I missed that one and have been kicking myself in the *** for having done so. Just absolutely love this line.

Just received Bronnenkant's Boelcke book from him and would love to see a series of his planes made as a tribute , who knows maybe down the road at some point. Anyway just FANTASTIC news that this line lives on.
Hi Gephard,
If I might ask, where did you get the Bronnenkant book on Boelcke? I have been unsuccessful at trying to find it anywhere. Would appreciate any info. -- Al
 
Hi Gephard,
If I might ask, where did you get the Bronnenkant book on Boelcke? I have been unsuccessful at trying to find it anywhere. Would appreciate any info. -- Al

Hi Al,

I would be happy to help ya out. He has all the copies of the book at his house and I'm sure he would be happy to send one directly to you. I will send you a PM with Jacks email, he is selling the books for Lance just place an order with Jack and Lance will send the book to you. All the best Gebhard
 
Hi Al,

I would be happy to help ya out. He has all the copies of the book at his house and I'm sure he would be happy to send one directly to you. I will send you a PM with Jacks email, he is selling the books for Lance just place an order with Jack and Lance will send the book to you. All the best Gebhard
Many thanks, sir. I've had my eye on that book for a while but haven't found one. -- Al
 
Really like the Voss triplane. It is an aircraft that I have wanted for a long time. John has apparently opted for the factory camo version, meaning that he has decided that the cowling should be the Fokker factory dark green, with the Voss kite face applied to it. There is a possibility that the cowling was painted in the color of yellow, the ID color of Jasta 10, Voss' Jasta. Since the film used in WW1 tended to turn yellow into a dark appearance in the B/W photos of the time, this has developed into a running argument with no real definite answer. There are apparently no written records that describe the Voss tripe, thus photo interpretation is the only option and this will not provide the final answer because yellow and dark green both appear the same tonal value in the pictures. This would also hold true for the tire discs, which show dark in period photos. At any rate, there is no final answer to the question of yellow or green for the cowling so one is as good as the other. Just happy to have a Voss triplane in the future. -- Al


I too asked John if he could do the Voss, Dr1. VERY happy to see it's coming. I also like that he chose the green cowling for his rendition. However the kite face looks a bit too Thomas the Tank Engine happy to me. the eyebrows need to be pointed and more serious, and the eye shapes around cooling holes in cowling are round and cute and not as "angry" appearing as the painting on the real Voss Dr1 I wonder if John's artists have time to correct this before production?
 
I too asked John if he could do the Voss, Dr1. VERY happy to see it's coming. I also like that he chose the green cowling for his rendition. However the kite face looks a bit too Thomas the Tank Engine happy to me. the eyebrows need to be pointed and more serious, and the eye shapes around cooling holes in cowling are round and cute and not as "angry" appearing as the painting on the real Voss Dr1 I wonder if John's artists have time to correct this before production?
Interesting observation about the face and upon closer examination and comparison with period photos of the Voss tripe, I think you are correct. The eyebrows certainly need sharpening and the eye whites need to be moved off center in an upwards direction. Can't see enough of the moustache to comment on that. Good catch. Hopefully, this is just an early test example that will be sharpened up and have certain details corrected, as the face markings aren't the only problems. -- Al
 
I have to agree but I sure wish you wouldn't have said Thomas the Train, now I can't see anything else.

wv1.jpg
 
Interesting observation about the face and upon closer examination and comparison with period photos of the Voss tripe, I think you are correct. The eyebrows certainly need sharpening and the eye whites need to be moved off center in an upwards direction. Can't see enough of the moustache to comment on that. Good catch. Hopefully, this is just an early test example that will be sharpened up and have certain details corrected, as the face markings aren't the only problems. -- Al
Heard from John this AM. He said that there would be no problems with needed changes. Leads me to the conclusion that the photos of the Voss tripe are of the master and NOT the finished production model. This is great news as I am sure concerns will be listened to and problems corrected before the Voss tripe appears. John is very detailed oriented and has a history of trying very hard to get the details right and he listens to his customers. Not to worry. -- Al
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top