Great question that is sure to present a great variation in answers. I would love to have flown a Boeing F4b. It is a beautiful aircraft with fantastic handling features and a good speed. I want to know what it was like to fly what many inter-war US military pilots considered their favorite aircraft. Besides, you can't beat the variations in color schemes from the US Navy of the 1930's.:wink2:^&grin^&cool -- AlIf you won a competition that awarded you flying lesssons and a reproduction biplane of your choice, what plane would you choose and why?
Great question that is sure to present a great variation in answers. I would love to have flown a Boeing F4b. It is a beautiful aircraft with fantastic handling features and a good speed. I want to know what it was like to fly what many inter-war US military pilots considered their favorite aircraft. Besides, you can't beat the variations in color schemes from the US Navy of the 1930's.:wink2:^&grin^&cool -- Al
I was really tempted by the various WW1 aircraft like the Fokker tripe or the Camel but besides the fact they are both inherently unstable and have to be flown with no break in concentration, they are both rotary engine powered and throw off excess oil quite liberally, meaning a nice dose of castor oil sprayed in the pilots general direction. I'm too much a wuss for those challenges. {sm3} -- AlReally interesting choice - I am still considering. I am tempted by the Camel - except my wife would burn the wreckage after I killed myself trying to take off on my first solo. The Fokker Triplane is also tempting because of the connection with the Baron. I have always had a soft spot for the Gladiator and the Swordfish. I saw the skeleton of one of the latter in a museum on Malta just begging for an injection of funds. Then there is the appeal of a flying boat - cannot get classier than that! The swordfish would be good for family outings though ... a hard choice.
I was really tempted by the various WW1 aircraft like the Fokker tripe or the Camel but besides the fact they are both inherently unstable and have to be flown with no break in concentration, they are both rotary engine powered and throw off excess oil quite liberally, meaning a nice dose of castor oil sprayed in the pilots general direction. I'm too much a wuss for those challenges. {sm3} -- Al
I quite understand. I'm afraid the term 'crash and burn' would appear in my obit after any solo flying excursion, as well. :tongue: -- AlMy concerns are not so much the dirt and grime but the extensive demands on my co-ordination!
I quite understand. I'm afraid the term 'crash and burn' would appear in my obit after any solo flying excursion, as well. :tongue: -- Al
Neat aircraft. I've always liked the Supermarine Walrus. -- Al
If its co-ordination you are worried about....stay way from the WW! aircraft, even the modern day pilots who fly the reps say they are hard to fly.....the nearest thing to them would be a Tiger moth...they are all hands...feet and eyes to fly...perfect on a good day.... me...I wanna fly a Dc3......cheers TomBMy concerns are not so much the dirt and grime but the extensive demands on my co-ordination!
If you would pardon me...I think the Walrus was a smaller aircraft with a single engine and was very successful rescuing downed pilots in the channel..... had one on my Flight Simulator once....cheers TomBNeat aircraft. I've always liked the Supermarine Walrus. -- Al
I have the only wood museum quality Demon King & Country ever made, and I agree, it is lovely:wink2:.