London Toy Soldier Show - John Jenkins at JJD UK (1 Viewer)

This model has been seen in previous photos from John's USA tour, but here it is again, as supplied to us by John.
This model will feature in our Sudan display at the show next Saturday! We are hoping for a painted figure on the day, but this is unconfirmed.
 

Attachments

  • the-sudan-madcav-02-madhist-cavalry-casualty.jpg
    the-sudan-madcav-02-madhist-cavalry-casualty.jpg
    224.9 KB · Views: 460
James...Adam...I hope you don't mind me posting this off your website...not trying to steal your thunder...but it's just toooooooooooooo sweet not to show on here...this set is just ridiculous nice...it will make a perfect vignette by itself...
 

Attachments

  • the-sudan-death-of-burnaby-john-jekins-designs.jpg
    the-sudan-death-of-burnaby-john-jekins-designs.jpg
    240.3 KB · Views: 588
James...Adam...I hope you don't mind me posting this off your website...not trying to steal your thunder...but it's just toooooooooooooo sweet not to show on here...this set is just ridiculous nice...it will make a perfect vignette by itself...

While he might be a little short for Col. Fred Burnaby, it looks like Burnaby in his last moments slashing away. Either way nice figures!
 
Frederick Burnaby: the Bravest Man in England

"I have, unfortunately for my own interests, from my earlier childhood had what my old nurse used to call a most ‘contradictorious’ spirit” - Fred Burnaby

In the Victorian age of larger-than-life heroes, the wildly eccentric colonel towered above the lot of them. He stood 6ft 4ins tall, weighed 15 stone, boasted a 47-inch chest - and had balls to match his enormous frame.

The son of a clergyman, Fred joined the army in 1859 – aged 17 – and quickly became recognised as the strongest man in its ranks. A first-rate boxer, swordsman, rider and runner, his party tricks included vaulting over billiard tables and twisting pokers into knots with his bare hands. He once carried two ponies downstairs at Windsor Castle for a prank, picking one up under each arm like they were cats.

Fred was also into politics. An old-school Tory, he stood for Parliament in 1880 – pitching himself against Joseph Chamberlain in the latter’s Birmingham stronghold.

Chamberlain was one of the bigwigs of the day; Fred never really had a hope. But courage is when you know you’re beaten before you start and you throw yourself into it anyway. Fred was nothing if not courageous – courageous to the point of lunacy most of the time. He lost of course. But by God he gave Chamberlain a run for his money and no one who followed the campaigning in Birmingham that year ever forget Fred Burnaby.

At one meeting in Wolverhampton, for instance, Fred had his stewards bring two persistent hecklers up to the front. He went to the edge of the stage, leaned over and picked them both up by their collars, one in each hand. He then lifted them high for all to see and carried them at arm’s length to the back of the platform where he plonked them in two chairs.

“Sit there, little man. And you, little man, sit there,” he told them in his booming cavalry voice. The crowd was impressed. The heckling stopped. No one was left in any doubt that Colonel Burnaby was not an easy man to intimidate.

One of the most extraordinary men Sudan has ever seen was on the rise at the time. Muhammad Ahmad had gathered around him an army of desert tribesmen and called out for holy war. He was a nineteenth-century Osama bin Laden. He wanted to drive the Egyptians and British out of his country and convert the world to Islam. They called him the Mahdi, “the expected one”. And he wasn’t a man to argue with.

The Mahdi’s followers were a fanatical and ferocious lot. They had God on their side and a terrifyingly impressive record of massacring their enemies. In 1883, a 10,000-strong Egyptian force led by a British officer, William Hicks, was sent against them. It was completely destroyed; just a few hundred men returned alive. Hicks’s head was cut off and taken to the Mahdi.

The following year, Fred – yet again travelling without permission - was among more than 4,000 British troops who had another crack at the rebels at the second battle of El Teb. It was a brutal clash fought at close quarters. And the mighty figure of Fred Burnaby was in the thick of it, doing dire work with a characteristically unorthodox weapon: a double-barrelled shotgun.

Fred used the butt as well both barrels to fearsome effect – a tactic that got his liberal opponents in a lather (killing Arabs with a shotgun: not the done thing at all, old chap). But this time the British won. Fred was mentioned in despatches. He returned home a hero, to most.

The Mahdi army wasn’t finished though. Far from it. Now General Gordon found himself besieged at Khartoum - and, after much dithering, the British government sent a relief expedition under General Wolseley to save him (too late, as things turned out).

Fred, naturally, wanted a piece of the action and Wolseley was happy to have him on board. But bad-boy Burnaby had by now upset so many people at the top his request to go back to the Sudan was turned down.

Who needs permission when you’re Fred Burnaby though? So, true to form, he simply waited for his leave to come around again. Then off he sailed, arriving in Africa against orders and catching up with the British force as it advanced towards Khartoum.

Welcomed by Wolseley, Fred immediately pushed up to the front. When a vanguard of 1,500 British troops ran into about 12,000 Sudanese a few weeks later, he was with them. And it was here, at a dusty desert watering hole called Abu Klea, that his luck finally ran out.

The rebels charged, unexpectedly and ferociously. The British formed into their usual fighting square and fired off a volley. But it failed to check the onslaught and the Mahdists kept coming at them.

The evening before Fred had told the Daily Telegraph’s war correspondent, a Mr Burleigh, he’d left his shotgun behind because of the fuss it’d created when he last used it in battle. Fuss or no fuss, it would have come in handy now.

The Sudanese smashed into the British, piercing their lines in a wild attack. A bloody free-for-all of hacking, slashing and shooting ensued. Burleigh reports seeing Fred riding out, sword in hand, to help a handful of comrades caught stranded outside the square by the sudden charge.

A Mahdi rebel lunged at him with an 8ft spear, but he saw it coming. “Burnaby fenced smartly… and there was a smile on his features as he drove off the man’s awkward points,” writes the Telegraph reporter.

As the struggle continued, a second spearman came up behind Fred and jabbed him in the shoulder. It wasn’t a serious wound but it made him glance back, just for a second. And in that brief moment, the first guy seized his chance and ran his javelin into Fred’s throat.

The force pushed the huge soldier out of his saddle and dumped him on the ground. Burleigh saw what happened next: “Half a dozen Arabs were now about him. With the blood gushing in streams from his gashed throat, the dauntless Guardsman leapt to his feet, sword in hand, and slashed at the ferocious group. They were the wild strokes of a proud, brave man dying hard and he was quickly overborne, and left helpless and dying.”

Dying, but not yet dead. The Mahdi army’s attack ended as swiftly as it started and Fred was still clinging to life when another officer, Lord Binning, found him lying on the ground, his head in the lap of a young private. The lad was crying. “Oh sir,” he said to Binning, “here is the bravest man in England, dying and no one to help him.”

Fred tried to speak but couldn’t. By now, he had a bullet wound in the forehead as well as the hole in his throat. Part of his head had also been cut away. Despite all this, the story goes that Fred died with his familiar smile on his face. Not sure if I believe it, mind. But I want to.


http://greatbritishnutters.blogspot.com/2008/01/frederick-burnaby-bravest-man-in_23.html
 
some pics...
 

Attachments

  • 0133-0500_colonel_frederick_burnaby.jpg
    0133-0500_colonel_frederick_burnaby.jpg
    47.3 KB · Views: 460
  • battle-melee.jpg
    battle-melee.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 459
You all should look up the book "The True Blue: The Life and Adventures of Colonel Fred Burnaby, 1842-85". Written by Michael Alexander in 1957, published by Rupert Hart-Davis in London. -- Al
 
Well Mike you did certainly steal my thunder, but that's ok....
Here I am turning up to do the 'reveal' and you've done it all for me....
:rolleyes: :)

I think its right up there as one of my favorite pieces John is to release.

Did you know he was a published author?
A Ride to Khiva: Travels and Adventures in Central Asia ISBN 978-0192880505
On Horseback Through Asia Minor ISBN 978-0192825001
Practical Instruction of Staff Officers in Foreign Armies, published 1872
A Ride across the Channel, published 1882
Our Radicals: a tale of love and politics, published 1886
and he made regular contributions to The Times, Vanity Fair and Punch from 1872 onwards

Very excited today, as all the show stock arrived, including the December releases, Dragoons, show samples, Jonesy and a few more surprises we've not yet seen.
We will be sure to be posting images on this thread after the show making sure everyone is included.

Best wishes
James
 
Well Mike you did certainly steal my thunder, but that's ok....
Here I am turning up to do the 'reveal' and you've done it all for me....
:rolleyes: :)

I think its right up there as one of my favorite pieces John is to release.

Did you know he was a published author?
A Ride to Khiva: Travels and Adventures in Central Asia ISBN 978-0192880505
On Horseback Through Asia Minor ISBN 978-0192825001
Practical Instruction of Staff Officers in Foreign Armies, published 1872
A Ride across the Channel, published 1882
Our Radicals: a tale of love and politics, published 1886
and he made regular contributions to The Times, Vanity Fair and Punch from 1872 onwards

Very excited today, as all the show stock arrived, including the December releases, Dragoons, show samples, Jonesy and a few more surprises we've not yet seen.
We will be sure to be posting images on this thread after the show making sure everyone is included.

Best wishes
James

James,

Ride to Khiva and On Horseback through Asia Minor are some of the best written and easiest to read non-fiction accounts I've ever read, and I am a huge fan of Frederick Burnaby as an author and as a man. The story I have come across of his death was that it was the reason the releif force did not reach Gordon in time. I read that secretately, Sir Garnet Woseley had instructed Burnaby to take command if the leader of the expeditionary force he was sending ahead to the nile got killed, as the nominal second in command was inexperienced and indecisive. When Burnaby was killed, and the leader of the force mortally wounded by a spear to the groin (YIKES!) the indecisive second in command failed to push forward for a few days, and the force reached Khartoum only a couple of days too late. Had Burnaby survived, and taken command, he might very well have made it in time to relieve Gordon, saving Gordon's life and Sir Garnet's reputation.
 
Louis, thank you kindly for that!
I just ordered both of them.

I have read a few books from this publisher, mainly about the Russian Civil War; my recommendation for another good read;
Setting the East ablaze
Which is also a fabulous larger than life adventure!
Spies, Elephants and escapes!

I hope that the contempory writting by Burnaby is something similar or better!
 
Maj., Most if not all of the Sudan figures so far were for the Battle of El Teb or Tamai. Does the release of "The Death of Burnaby" set mean we will be seeing some Abu Klea sets other than "The Death of Burnaby"?

Donnie
 
Dear Donnie,
In truth I don't know the answer, but I do know that John has a great enthusiasm for this period and conflict, tempered by the huge amount of releases John already has planned, I would guess that John would be very willing to expand this in all areas based upon the level of demand, assuming space in his production capacity. He 'may' already have done some, as Everyone knows John keeps things close to his chest!

Maj., Most if not all of the Sudan figures so far were for the Battle of El Teb or Tamai. Does the release of "The Death of Burnaby" set mean we will be seeing some Abu Klea sets other than "The Death of Burnaby"?

Donnie
 
Well I have really enjoyed the new sets coming out for the Sudan range. I really don't collect this as seriously as I do the French and Indian war, but some of these sets are great. And my son likes the Ansar with the two handed sword. I think I might start this series as a collection he and I can do together. He's almost five, my wife should believe that as the reason I am starting a new range to collect. " But it's for the children." Or maybe I can blame John, "he said he made this set just for Ian."

Yeah, I'll let you know how that flies. :)

Matthew
 
Some really excellent sets coming out.The Sudan wars really lend itself to John's style.
Mark
 
This is all helping to inflame my already passion for this era, the more the better. Go Sudan. Cheers, Robin.
 
Ok, I think our Major Duncan Heyward is trying to send me over the edge and he is being successful. :p:p:p His latest signature quotation is of course from the 1990's movie Last of the Mohicans. I just noticed it this morning while reading this thread. Visually, the artillery scenes are wonderful, you just have to ignore this verbal exchange between Heyward and Monro. Actually, at this point in the movie, I throw my popcorn at the screen and dive deeper into my snuggie.

You can't fire a large mortar any closer than about 650 yards. It is fused weapon and you can't cut the fuse any shorter than the fuse aperture will allow ---, so 650-700 yards the minimum distance. The idea for a mortar or howitzer charge is to explode in the air, just before impacting the ground. For french mortar fire, the gunners would light two different fuses, one for the artillery piece to launch the projectile in the air (typical artillery stuff), plus a near simulataneous lighting of the fuse on the projectile itself (awkward at best, and if the first fuse does not properly fire, you then run like hell as the projectile will still explode while sitting in the barrel).

If the french had been digging only 30 yards of trench per day, the siege would still be going on today. They were digging closer to 150-200 yards of trench per day.

The artillery that Montcalm was moving to the forward third battery (200 yards) were cannon, not mortars, not howitzers. Point blank solid shot cannon to breach the walls. Up close and personal kinetic energy.

The British had been firing on the French position since August 3rd. The first French battery (800 yards)was not in position to return fire until the morning of August 6th (Eight Cannon, including 3 -18 pounders, plus 1 – 9” mortar (Nester); Dodge has 8 Cannon - 12 and 18 pounders, and 2-10” mortars at 700 yards; Parkman 8 cannon and a mortar). The second French battery (700 yards) was readied on August 7th (2-18 Pounders, 5 – 12 Pounders, 1-8 Pounder, 2-7 Howitzer and 1-6” Mortar (Nester); Dodge has 10 cannon, 1 mortar and 2 howitzers; Parkman 11 pieces). Essentially, the British had 3 days of “free” firing on the French and during that time used a considerable amount of their gunpowder reserves.

An interesting aside, the majority of British artillery losses at FWH (1757) came as a result of “bursting” barrels, many during the first three days of the siege when the French were still digging their initial siege trenches and prior to the time the French opened their first battery. At least six British artillery pieces burst prior to the French opening their first battery because of metal fatigue and overcharging. All told, the British lost at least 10 or 11 guns/large mortars to bursting, including both of their 32-pounders and both of their 18-pounders, two 12-pounders and two 9-pounders and two or three large mortars. I can find only references to a single brass 6-pounder being destroyed by direct French artillery fire. British sailors were apparently manning most of the guns. At the time of the British surrender, a very liberal estimate of the remaining British artillery is a single 12-pounder, two 9-pounders, two brass 6-pounders, four 4-pounders, one 7-inch howitzer and a mortar. Colonel Fyre’s journal indicates that the largest remaining British gun was a single 9-pounder plus the 7-inch howitzer and another five pieces of artillery ---- 4-pound and 6-pound cannon. Steele (Betrayals: Fort William Henry) describes the artillery in the fort on the morning of the surrender as being 5 small cannon, 1 howitzer and 1 mortar, but this last estimate may not included the 6-pounders within the entrenched camp. Dodge (Relief is Greatly Wanted) suggests that this last mortar actually burst prior to the surrender. The available gunpowder was nearly exhausted.

The full exchange between Heyward and Monro contains additional errors, but all kidding aside, the Heyward/Monro quote is really a good signature --- keep it {bravo}}
 
Ok, I think our Major Duncan Heyward is trying to send me over the edge and he is being successful.

I thought you were going to say that you now have started collecting Sudan figures.:smile2: I like the post though, some good info there. While the film is not accurate, it looks cool.

Here is a side note that ties in with this and is pretty sad. When John went to Florida, he did a lecture at a high school for the sculpting class. He was explaining some of the FIW figures and made a comment about the film. None of these 17ish year old kids had ever heard of this movie, let alone the time period.{eek3}^&confuse{eek3} John and I just shook our heads. I think they should have had to watch the movie after that for some extra credit.

Matthew
 
Unfortunately this is not surprising. In my graduate seminar on Archaeological Method and Theory half of the students never heard of Stalin.
In fact, their general knowledge of geography and history is typically so poor that spent a fair bit of lecture time providing background information subject matter that they should have learned in high school. This applies equally to undergraduate and graduate students.
Benjamin



I thought you were going to say that you now have started collecting Sudan figures.:smile2: I like the post though, some good info there. While the film is not accurate, it looks cool.

Here is a side note that ties in with this and is pretty sad. When John went to Florida, he did a lecture at a high school for the sculpting class. He was explaining some of the FIW figures and made a comment about the film. None of these 17ish year old kids had ever heard of this movie, let alone the time period.{eek3}^&confuse{eek3} John and I just shook our heads. I think they should have had to watch the movie after that for some extra credit.

Matthew
 
Fraxinus, I think you've educated me on a lot of real vs movie moments!
You have also given me a massive grin, thank you!

Keep the infomation comming, I've a few quotes from LOTM left yet! :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top