There must be a story behind the headless horseman...cannon ball? In any case, you must be thrilled with these exquisitely crafted figures. Thanks for sharing.
I quite agree, actually they are my largest contingent (42) now.If you do collect the french chasseurs, the flag bearer is very nicely done and looks pretty unique among the flag bearers mainly because of the pose with one foot sitting on a rock. The flag is also wonderfully painted.
Alex
Spartan,
I could add some katsup to the body of my hussar, flowing from his neck, as he was struck by a cannon ball... Then I could rename the piece the GORE Hussar
Colbert is so well done it will be a center piece in my collection and I will display him alone. I might do as well with all FL special edition figures and display them side by side.
Alex
LOL, It is definitely would be an option with the Hussar.
I am also thinking The same way with having Colbert Be the Centerpiece, Of My now Forming French army, I am just hoping That The Red Lancers that K&C has, will match the color scheme that FL has, with not too much retouching in paints. I have washes and inks, plus glazes. I hope it will be enough.
It is isn't it? I now have one in my shelf and find your idea of displaying these special figures separately a very good one.Spartan,
Colbert is so well done it will be a center piece in my collection and I will display him alone. I might do as well with all FL special edition figures and display them side by side.
Alex
That is a good point on the colors. Moreover, once in the field, the wear and tear and fading from sun and rain and whatever passed for laundry would have produced even further variations in shade and color.I think that matching the paints from one manufacturer to another is a common concern, but keep this in mind, with so little industrialization during the Napoleonic era, dye lots were often irregular, so that units in the same companies often did not match. You will notice that some painters even intentionally uniform their troops irregularly (pardon the paradox there). I know when it comes to French infantry, I rarely have two identical figures in a company, and trousers are often non-issue.
I would agree in general with the K&C colors appearing more parade ground or even overly bright. They are indeed unique and mixing is often a challenge given the differences in sculpting and style. I think the Britains figures fit in better with FL but I have mixed some in from both, but only the mounted figures from K&C.Generally speaking, I think you will find the K&C colors will be a bit more vivid while the FL figures have had a heavier treatment of wash, so may appear more muted. Frankly, I wouldn't worry about it, both companies produce lovely figures worthy of appreciating for their unique character. What a great dilemma to have!
That is a good point on the colors. Moreover, once in the field, the wear and tear and fading from sun and rain and whatever passed for laundry would have produced even further variations in shade and color.
Great book suggestions; I just ordered the pair.Right! I know some folks here have these books, but if you don't and you have a concern about the uniform inconsistencies, see if you can get your hands on Brassey's History of Uniforms Napoleonic Wars Napoleon's Army (by Rene Chartrand) and Brassey's History of Uniforms, Napoleonic Wars Wellington's Army (by Ian Fletcher). Both of these books give you a sense of just how much variety there was and why. I thought the text on Wellington's Army, in particular, demonstrated why uniforms were often bearly distinguishable in the Penninsula and what modifications troops often employed on their own with the absence of regular refitting. I know both these books changed the way I paint Napoleonic units, looking now for opportiunities to distinguish a single figure with a unique look (even as minor as a cartridge box cover).
Great book suggestions; I just ordered the pair.