New Releases for August 2023 - American Civil War (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
NEW RELEASES FOR AUGUST 2023
AMERICAN CIVIL WAR
ARTILLERY

A typical “field piece” had an authorized crew of 12 enlisted men constituting a “gun section” led by a sergeant and assisted by one (and sometimes two) corporal. Each section consisted of one “gun,” its “limber” (with one ammunition chest also serving as a seat) and (nominally) six horses (but often only four) to pull it, and a “caisson” (with two ammunition chests/ seats, a spare wheel, tools, and crew baggage) with its own limber pulled by another six horses, and two “spare” horses (when available) tethered to the rear of the caisson. Each “vehicle” was known as a “half section.” Two sections under the command of a second lieutenant constituted a platoon.
While the platoon commander and the two section sergeants (there were no “platoon sergeants” at that time) rode their own assigned horses, six artillerymen rode the three left-side horses in each half section, while the remaining six privates either rode on the three ammunition chests (two to three per chest/seat) or walked alongside. Three platoons (sometimes only two, especially in Confederate units), plus a small headquarters, under a captain, assisted by a first lieutenant and a first sergeant, constituted a “battery.”



ACWART-03
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
M1841 6-POUNDER FIELD GUN.
(10 pcs)

The M1841 6-pounder field gun was a bronze smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon that was adopted by the United States Army in 1841 and used from the Mexican-American War to the American Civil War.
It fired a 6.1lb round shot up to a distance of 1,523yds at 5 degree elevation. It could also fire canister shot and spherical case shot.

The cannon was used during the early years of the American Civil War, but it was soon outclassed by newer field guns such as the 12 pounder Napoleon.
In the Union Army, the 6-pounders were replaced as soon as more modern weapons became available and none were manufactured after 1862. However the Confederate States Army continued to use the cannon for a longer period because the lesser industrial capacity of the South could not produce newer guns as fast as the North.

CSART-04.jpg


CSART-04

THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
CONFEDERATE ARTILLERY.
SERGEANT.
(1 pc)

CSART-05.jpg


CSART-05
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
CONFEDERATE ARTILLERY.
ARTILLERY CREW LOADING.
(2 pcs)


CSART-06.jpg


CSART-06

THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
CONFEDERATE ARTILLERY.
ARTILLERY CREW LOADING.
(2 pcs)


THE FIRST BATTLE OF MANASSAS, 1861.
THE ARMY OF THE SHENANDOAH,
1[SUP]st[/SUP] ROCKBRIDGE ARTILLERY

The Seventy men of the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] Rockbridge Artillery were organized in April 1861 by Virginia Military Institute professor John McCausland. William N. Pendleton took command of the battery in late April after McCausland was transferred to command another unit.

The battery was initially equipped with two 6 pounders from VMI and two guns from Richmond.
Pendleton named the first four guns “Mathew”, “Mark”, “Luke” and “John”, after the Apostles.

ROCKART-03.jpg


ROCKART-03

THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
THE FIRST BATTLE OF MANASSAS, 1861.
THE ARMY OF THE SHENANDOAH,
1[SUP]st[/SUP] ROCKBRIDGE ARTILLERY
M1841 6-POUNDER FIELD GUN.
(10 pcs)

The M1841 6-pounder field gun was a bronze smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon that was adopted by the United States Army in 1841 and used from the Mexican-American War to the American Civil War.
It fired a 6.1lb round shot up to a distance of 1,523yds at 5 degree elevation. It could also fire canister shot and spherical case shot.

The cannon was used during the early years of the American Civil War, but it was soon outclassed by newer field guns such as the 12 pounder Napoleon.
In the Union Army, the 6-pounders were replaced as soon as more modern weapons became available and none were manufactured after 1862. However the Confederate States Army continued to use the cannon for a longer period because the lesser industrial capacity of the South could not produce newer guns as fast as the North.

ROCKART-07_2_.jpg


On 18[SUP]th[/SUP] July the battery moved east with the Stonewall Brigade to link up with Confederate general P.G.T. Beauregard’s troops at Manassas Junction. On 21[SUP]st[/SUP] July during the First Battle of Manassas, Pendleton’s Battery was among the Confederate batteries defending the key position of the battle, Henry House Hill. The Battery was visited by Confederate president Jefferson Davis, who had gone to Manassas to watch the battle, during the Union retreat. In the aftermath of the battle, the battery received captured Union cannon.

ROCKART-07.jpg


ROCKART-07
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861 - 1865
THE FIRST BATTLE OF MANASSAS, 1861.
THE ARMY OF THE SHENANDOAH,
1[SUP]st[/SUP] ROCKBRIDGE ARTILLERY
“MATHEW” ARTILLERY CREW, LOADING .
(5 pcs)


**PLEASE CONTACT YOUR DEALER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
 
Any sugnuficance of the color?
Is the green suppised to be Union and the red Confederate?
TIA
E
 
Any sugnuficance of the color?
Is the green suppised to be Union and the red Confederate?
TIA
E

You are correct. The green is for the Union and the red for the Confederates.
 
Given that #2 is inserting a round into the bore, it would be better if #1 was using the ramming end of the rammer instead of the sponge.

CSART-05.jpg
 
Given that #2 is inserting a round into the bore, it would be better if #1 was using the ramming end of the rammer instead of the sponge.

CSART-05.jpg

That's a good catch! Maybe he just got done sponging the barrel and the guy is getting into place with the round? But then wouldn't the powder charge go in first? I'm not super familiar with the steps of loading so I'd have to look it up.
 
Last edited:
That's a good catch! Maybe he just got done sponging the barrel and the guy is getting into place with the round? But then wouldn't the powder charge go in first? I'm not super familiar with the steps of loading so I'd have to look it up.

#2 man is correctly loading the round charge-first. The charge and the projectile are strapped together.
 
Given that #2 is inserting a round into the bore, it would be better if #1 was using the ramming end of the rammer instead of the sponge.

CSART-05.jpg

That's a good catch! Maybe he just got done sponging the barrel and the guy is getting into place with the round? But then wouldn't the powder charge go in first? I'm not super familiar with the steps of loading so I'd have to look it up.

I was so excited to see these that I totally overlooked that discrepancy. You have a good eye for detail Brother Jonathan. As Cameron suggested, I will place #1 very close to the gun muzzle as if he was removing the sponge while I'll have #2 coming up the side of the gun with load in hand.

Mike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top