New Releases for December 2023 - Ancient Rome (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,082
NEW RELEASES FOR DECEMBER 2023
ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT ROME
THE CARTHAGINIANS
THE BATTLE OF ZAMA 202BC

Carthage learnt the use of elephants from fighting in Sicily against Pyrrhus of Epirus between 278 and 276 BC.
The Carthaginians quickly realized they could easily acquire African Forest Elephants which inhabited North Africa in great numbers. It was much easier to capture these elephants than import elephants from India.
It was not long before Carthage had the most powerful elephant corps in the Mediterranean world, with stables housing up to 300 elephants located in the capital. They would replace chariots as the Carthaginian’s main striking force.

cte-01_3_.jpg


The elephants primarily used by the Carthaginian armies were of the now extinct smaller African kind.
They stood between 2m and 2.5m tall.
These elephants were taken from the now long vanished forests of Numidia. Their primary use was to terrify the uninitiated man and horse, and they carried a single rider known as a mahout, who was armed with a javelin. Each elephant could also carry an additional soldier armed with javelins or a long spear.

It is believed that the elephants deployed at Zama did not carry infantry in howdahs on their backs.
Most scholars doubt it as the forest species being smaller than Asian elephants, it is believed could not carry the additional weight. Any elephants with towers were believed to have been imported from India.
However the Egyptian Ptolemies as well as Numidian kings are recorded as having put towers on forest elephants, and the Roman poet Juvenal mentions towers on Hannibal’s elephants.



CTE-01

ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT ROME,
THE CARTHAGINIANS,
THE BATTLE OF ZAMA 202BC,
CARTHAGINIAN AFRICAN FOREST WAR ELEPHANT.
(4 pcs)

In 218 BC the Second Punic War began and the famous Carthaginian general Hannibal traversed the Alps to invade Italy with an army that included 37 war elephants, which were believed to be mostly African.
In the course of that arduous crossing, many men, cavalry and draught animals were lost, but apparently (according to ancient sources) not a single elephant.
The elephants were to contribute to Hannibal’s first victory in Italy, on the Trebbia river, where they frightened the Roman cavalry and routed the Roman auxiliaries.
Shortly after the battle, all but one elephant died. It is not known why? Maybe the after effects of exhaustion suffered during the crossing, or some disease incurred during the campaign, are all distinct possibilities.


cte-01_2_.jpg



The Battle of Zama in 202BC proved to be the crucial encounter of the Second Punic War. The Carthaginians led by Hannibal, met the invading Roman army under the command of Scipio, who afterwards was titled “Africanus”.
The armies were equally matched, but Hannibal had a force of 80 war elephants. The Carthaginian army had been assembled in a hurry, was manned with a considerable number of recruits and the recently caught elephants had not been fully trained.

Both generals concentrated their infantry in the centre, with cavalry on the wings. Hannibal stationed the 80 war elephants in front of his infantry, and started the battle by ordering the elephants to attack.
Scipio had anticipated this attack and had set up his infantry in the usual standard 3 lines, but instead of the draught board formation he placed the maniples in rows with gaps between them.
The lightly armed velites preceded the infantrymen, and were prepared to meet the advancing elephants.
During the attack the Romans blew their trumpets and horns, and beat their shields with their swords, creating an unbearable noise. Some elephants frightened by the cacophony of noise pivoted and rushed into Hannibal’s Numidian cavalry, causing confusion, which Scipio’s own Numidian allies exploited to completely rout Hannibal’s left wing.
The rest of the elephants clashed with the Roman velites, and were drawn into the gaps in the Roman rows, where they were isolated by the velites and captured.

Because of these Roman tactics, the elephants did not seriously harm the Romans, whose cavalry having gained victory on the flanks, attacked the Carthaginian infantry in the rear, destroying Hannibal’s remaining army.

According to Appian, at Zama Hannibal’s elephants were equipped to inspire the enemy with horror, and it is believed they were draped in blood red cloth, and their ears painted red.

Defeated in the second Punic War, Carthage was forbidden to keep war elephants.

ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT ROME
ROMAN AUXILLIARY CAVALRY

As Romans were never considered exceptionally good horsemen, and the role of the cavalry not as important in the Roman thought process, the Equitatus was generally made up of non-Roman horsemen. While they would play an important part of Legionary tactics, the Roman Cavalry was considered secondary and would remain the weakest part of the Roman Army until the very late Imperial period.
Generally, the cavalry was used as light skirmishing troops, and mounted archers whose job was to patrol, act as scouts and messengers and to provide a mobile defensive screen while the legion was massing in battle array. As in all armies throughout history, the mounted trooper was also very effective in chasing down and harassing a fleeing and panicked enemy force.

romcav-10a_2_.jpg


As part of the military reforms of Augustus around AD 14, the Auxilia were re-organized. They would be trained to the same standards of discipline as the legions. They were mainly drawn from a wide range of warlike peoples throughout the provinces, and would receive Roman citizenship on completion of their 25 year sevice. Senior officers in contrast were Roman citizens.
The Auxilia filled the tasks of patrolling, containing raids, tax collecting, and the multitude of duties of the frontier troops.
They were especially suited to garrison and local policing activities, and could also hold their own in small scale warfare.

romcav-10a_1_.jpg


ROMCAV-10A
ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT ROME,
ROMAN AUXILIARY CAVALRY.
(2 pcs)

Roman Auxilia cavalry were usually heavily armored in mail and armed with a short lance, javelins, the Spatha long sword, and sometimes bows for specialist Horse archer units. These men primarily served as Medium missile cavalry for flanking, scouting, skirmish, and pursuit

Cavalry units were known as Alae, and were made up of 16 Turmae.
A Turmae consisted of 30 troopers, and was commanded by a Decurio, and a second in command called the Duplicarius.

Cavalrymen carried Clipeus , a flat oval or hexagonal shield. These were extremely light, constructed of double or triple thickness plywood, made up of thin strips of birch.

romcav-10b_2_.jpg




ROMCAV-10B
ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT ROME,
ROMAN AUXILIARY CAVALRY.
(2 pcs)
 
THE ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF GREECE AND MACEDONIA
THESSALIAN CAVALRY

The Army of the Kingdom of Macedon was among the greatest military forces of the ancient world.
The Thessalians are frequently referred to as the best cavalry units in the Macedonian army. This is thought to be because they were raised from the aristocracy of Thessaly, and were the finest horsemen in the Greek world.

The Vanguard squadron was the Pharsalian ile, which formed Parmenio’s personal bodyguard on the left wing at Gaugamela. It was the Thessalians counterpart to the Royal squadron of the Companions.
The Thessalians were identified by their distinctive national cloak, which was identifiable by the two points hanging down both in front and behind the wearer. These cloak ends used to bellow out behind the galloping horseman and gave the cloak its Greek nickname of “Thessalian Wings.”
Otherwise the details of dress are similar to the Companions.

THESS01-2023-M.jpg


Its organization and weaponry were similar to the Companion cavalry, though the earlier Thessalian way of fighting emphasized the use of javelins. The Thessalian cavalry was famed for its innovative use of rhomboid formations, said to have been developed by the Tagos (head of the Thessalian league) Jason of Pherae.
This formation was very efficient for manoeuvering, as it allowed the squadron to change direction at speed while still retaining cohesion.

This tactic was later developed by Philip of Macedonia into the Macedonian Wedge formation.

The numbers given for Alexander’s invasion of the Persian Empire included 1,800 such men. They were typically entrusted with the defensive role of guarding the left flank from enemy cavalry, allowing the decisive attack to be launched on the right. They often faced tremendous opposition when in this role. At Issus and Gaugamela, the Thessalians withstood the attack of Persian cavalry forces, though greatly outnumbered.



MAC-20
ARMIES AND ENEMIES OF ANCIENT GREECE AND MACEDONIA,
THE MACEDONIANS,
THESSALIAN CAVALRY,
PARMENIO.
(2 pcs)

Parmenio was a Macedonian general in the service of both Philip II of Macedon, and Alexander the Great. A Thessalian nobleman, Parmenio rose to become Philips chief military lieutenant and Alexander’s military general.
He was assassinated after his son Philotas was convicted on a charge of treason.

Although Alexander was recognized as king in Macedonia in October 336 BC, his accession was opposed by Attalus, a general in Parmenio’s army. In response, Parmenio put the general to death even though Parmenio was father in law to Attalus. Parmenio recognized that this was a necessary act if Alexander’s succession was to be smooth. As a consequence, Alexander was in Parmenio’s debt.

As a result, a number of Parmenio’s relatives were placed by Alexander in key positions in the Macedonian army. The youngest son, Nikanor became commander of the infantry regiment known as the shield bearers, his son in law Coenus commanded a phalanx battalion while another relative named Nicanor became admiral of the navy.
Parmenio’s oldest son Philotas was made commander of the Companion cavalry.

MAC-20_2_.jpg


The main building block of the Macedonian cavalry was the “ile” (squadron) of 200 men, commanded by an “ilarch” and divided into four “tetrarchiai” of 49 men, each under the command of a “tetrarch”
The tactical formation of each Tetrarchia was the wedge, an invention of Philip of Macedonia, with the Tetrarch at the point, and senior troopers riding in the middle and at each end of the base line.
It was the aim of Alexander to advance his army obliquely so as to cause dislocations in the enemies line as they attempted to outflank him on his right.

The Persian cavalry column attempting to turn his right flank would be kept at bay by successive charges of his light cavalry, delivered squadron by squadron. As the persian cavalry was forced to move further to the right, they would eventually lose contact with their main battle line. As soon as this dislocation was observed in the persian battle line, Alexander personally led the decisive charge of his heavy cavalry straight for it. This was not possible until new cavalry formations which allowed the squadrons to redeploy rapidly and reorient the axis of attack. The wedge gave this flexibility to Alexander’s cavalry, which is vividly illustrated in Curtius’ description of the cavalry fighting at Issus which took place when a massive Persian Cavalry column charged the Thessalian cavalry.

“But on the right the Persians were strongly attacking the Thessalian horsemen, and already one squadron had been ridden down by their very onset, when the Thessalians, smartly wheeling their horses about, slipped aside and returning to the fray, with great slaughter, overthrew the barbarians, whom confidence in their victory has scattered and thrown into disorder”

The Thessalian heavy cavalry accompanied Alexander during the first half of his Asian campaign and continued to be employed by the Macedonians as allies until Macedon’s final demise at the hands of the Romans.

** PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION **
 
Just emailed an order to Grey Goose, for the last of the current crop of Roman Cavalry releases, hopefully will arrive before the year is out.
John has once again done some great sculpts for these. Hopefully more of these action posed figures will get a revisit somewhere down the line, with more poses being added to expand battle scenes, as he did with the more relaxed patrolling Roman Cavalry figures of a few years ago which have recently been expanded upon with the originals being re-released, which enable me to add a couple more to the patrol.
In the meantime there are those addition Germanic tribesmen figures unveiled a few months back, then still in their pre-production stage and hopefully after these past months nearing the releasing stage.
Fingers crossed some more Iceni too, since there are still a few code numbers in the releases as yet not used !
 
WWWWOW!!!
The Thessalian rider is fabulous ! superbly painted! it makes you want !
and the elephants! but who can resist such exceptional figurines, frankly..
a special mention to JJD for the price, $208, it's really not excessive for an elephant mounted by two figurines of such good quality...
I was expecting to see the price of a cart Grec ou Lycien being $308... they are way below... thank you for this effort which must not have been easy...
This is worth pointing out, especially since it does not seem to be within the reach of all manufacturers.
 
WWWWOW!!!
The Thessalian rider is fabulous ! superbly painted! it makes you want !
and the elephants! but who can resist such exceptional figurines, frankly..
a special mention to JJD for the price, $208, it's really not excessive for an elephant mounted by two figurines of such good quality...
I was expecting to see the price of a cart Grec ou Lycien being $308... they are way below... thank you for this effort which must not have been easy...
This is worth pointing out, especially since it does not seem to be within the reach of all manufacturers.

I agree, great releases and very well-priced elephants.
Kudos to JJD for doing Carthage justice.
Best Wishes
Paddy
 
Parmenio AND an elephant for Christmas! Couldn't be happier with these releases.

Bests,
Chris
 
John does ancients really well. But this is the best release so far and all will go on the reserved list. Elephant and Thessalian are my picks of all the JJD December releases.
 
I see that the JJD elephants that he is releasing has the inside of the ears painted red. Supposedly he believes that Hannibal painted the elephants ears red at Zama but I cannot find anything that agrees with that. Does anyone have any information on that or can shed some light on this subject? Otherwise the elephants do not look realistic with that paint scheme and will not fit in with any other diorama.

Thanks
hHoward
 
I've added some additional photos of the CTE-01 Elephant and figures!


For those of you who have not received your parcels yet, I think you will quite like what you see when you open them!

Julie
 
I've added some additional photos of the CTE-01 Elephant and figures!


For those of you who have not received your parcels yet, I think you will quite like what you see when you open them!

Julie

Beautiful. And the other elephants will be just as awesome.
Thanks Julie and Merry Christmas.
Happy Holidays and Happy Collecting to All!
Paddy
 
I see that the JJD elephants that he is releasing has the inside of the ears painted red. Supposedly he believes that Hannibal painted the elephants ears red at Zama but I cannot find anything that agrees with that. Does anyone have any information on that or can shed some light on this subject? Otherwise the elephants do not look realistic with that paint scheme and will not fit in with any other diorama.

Thanks
hHoward

Bump
 
I see that the JJD elephants that he is releasing has the inside of the ears painted red. Supposedly he believes that Hannibal painted the elephants ears red at Zama but I cannot find anything that agrees with that. Does anyone have any information on that or can shed some light on this subject? Otherwise the elephants do not look realistic with that paint scheme and will not fit in with any other diorama.

Thanks
hHoward

Hi,

Wargamer's library to the rescue. I am not aware of any evidence for or against red-painted ears for Hannibal's elephants specifically, but this could be artistic license informed by a tomb painting of a Ptolemaic (Macedonian) elephant. See attached photos from the book for specifics. I personally really like the design choice.

Bests,
Chris

IMG_5632.JPGIMG_5634.JPGIMG_5633.JPGIMG_5636.JPGIMG_5635.JPG
 
This is undeniable proof of JJD's excellence in its search for historical documentation to create these products...
its credibility is even more reinforced...
the criticism made on the red ears of this elephant allowed me to learn a little more...
congratulations to Chris for this presentation!

for my part, I put forward the hypothesis that it was intended to frighten the horses of the opposing cavalry
 
Last edited:
This is undeniable proof of JJD's excellence in its search for historical documentation to create these products...
its credibility is even more reinforced...
the criticism made on the red ears of this elephant allowed me to learn a little more...
congratulations to Chris for this presentation!

for my part, I put forward the hypothesis that it was intended to frighten the horses of the opposing cavalry

Chris,
Thank you for the info and pictures relating to the elephants ears painted red. Even though they do not relate to Hannibal or the Carthaginians it is some historical evidence that some armies may have painted their elephants ears red.Personally I have never heard or seen that before so that is why I asked for help with this. I think JJD went out on a bit of a limb doing this to their elephants but they did a very nice job doing it. Does anyone have definitive info on Hannibal doing this? If so I think it would be wonderful to share with the collecting community. Also if John Jenkins has a personal resource on this subject I would love him to share with us.

Regards
Howard
 
Hi,

Wargamer's library to the rescue. I am not aware of any evidence for or against red-painted ears for Hannibal's elephants specifically, but this could be artistic license informed by a tomb painting of a Ptolemaic (Macedonian) elephant. See attached photos from the book for specifics. I personally really like the design choice.

Bests,
Chris

View attachment 300900View attachment 300898View attachment 300899View attachment 300896View attachment 300897

Thank you Chris for this article but I think it raises more questions than answers. The plate describes it as an African elephant with ears painted red. But the general consensus is that these elephants were too small to carry a howdah with 3 men much less all the weight of the armor on the beast. Also on the tomb drawing it shows the elephant with red ears but no howdah on back. Just some more interesting food for thought. The elephant in plate drawing looks great but is probably more fiction than fact.

Regards
Howard
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top