New Releases for January 2022 - Conquest of America (2 Viewers)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
NEW RELEASES FOR JANUARY 2022
THE CONQUEST OF AMERICA
SPANISH CONQUISTADORS

From the moment of Christopher Columbus' discovery of lands previously unknown to Europe in
1492, the New World captured the imagination of European adventurers. Thousands of men came
to the New World to seek fortune, glory, and land. For two centuries, these men explored the New
World, conquering any native people they came across in the name of the King of Spain (and the
hope of gold). They came to be known as the Conquistadors.

CQ-24.jpg

CQ-24
THE CONQUEST OF AMERICA,
SPANISH CONQUISTADORS,
ARQUEBUS AND CROSSBOW.
(2 pcs)

The Spanish army of the sixteenth century had been forged through the Reconquista of the Iberian peninsula by Ferdinand and Isabel who succeeded in overthrowing Granada in 1492, the last European Islamic state. This was mainly achieved by arming the citizenry and forming militias, something which was unthinkable in neighboring countries like France, where the elite class assured its survival by restricting the right to bear arms and armour.
The Spanish armies were therefore feared throughout Europe. Their pikemen and halberdiers thought nothing of dragging the flower of European nobility from their horses, allowing gunners to run their matchlocks up into their armour and literally blasting the helpless knights to pieces. By 1500 the Spanish citizen soldier had become the most efficient killer Europe had seen since the Roman legionaries.

In European battles since 1500, the Spanish armies adopted to fight in coordinated units of equal numbers of gunners/crossbow, pikemen and swordsmen.
First the Spanish gunners and crossbowmen shot massed volleys into the enemy pike phalanx, whilst the Spanish pikemen supplied a “hedgehog” defence. The gaps resulting from the concentrated fire, was then exploited by the heavily armoured swordsmen who dashed forward in packs to hack at the helpless pikemen, whose pikes were basically useless in such close quarter combat.
The combination was unbeatable, and would serve the Spaniards equally as well against the echelons of Aztec troops.


The primary weapons of the Conquistadors included swords, crossbows, matchlocks and to a lesser extent pike. The crossbow was important, as it was easy to manufacture and more reliable than the matchlocks especially in the humid tropics of Mexico and central America.

The Pike was extremely important to the Spanish armies. Even though the Aztecs possessed no cavalry, the Aztec armies tended to fight in large dense formations of light infantry and the primary danger for the Conquistador was being surprised and over run before they could bring their superior combinations of weapons to bear on their Aztec opponents. Pikes were therefore used to keep the massed ranks of the enemy at a distance, whilst the guns and crossbows inflicted their terrible damage. Swordsmen could then deal with any enemy that broke through.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
 
Perfect pair. Interesting poses and nice painting.
Glad the Conquistador "firing group is filling up". I like a ratio of 2 pikemen, 2 swordsmen, 1 arquebusier, 1 X-Bow & 1 other (casualty, etc.) plus 1 cavalry plus 2 Native Allies. Whatever.
Anyway, I expect to see some Aztec casualties, high and low caste, plus some Spanish. Perhaps the Noche Triste, the Spanish overburdened with loot...
Love it all. Best Wishes

Paddy
 
Great looking figures, but I would also like to see some injured/dead Conquistadores and indians soon ;)

Niels
 
I wish I had the space and money to collect this period. What amazing figures.
 
Very nice figures indeed. Most of the European figures could be used for the early 15th Century conflicts in Europe, like the Battle of Pavia… although that was in February… or other conflicts of the Italian Wars between the Hapsburg Empire and France…
 
Very nice figures indeed. Most of the European figures could be used for the early 15th Century conflicts in Europe, like the Battle of Pavia… although that was in February… or other conflicts of the Italian Wars between the Hapsburg Empire and France…[/QUOTE



I know you meant the early 16th century.....only issue would be the padded/quilted armor worn in the tropics. I took some of the more European armor figures and put them with my FL Pavia Landsknechts and they fit right in.
 
Very nice figures indeed. Most of the European figures could be used for the early 15th Century conflicts in Europe, like the Battle of Pavia… although that was in February… or other conflicts of the Italian Wars between the Hapsburg Empire and France…[/QUOTE



I know you meant the early 16th century.....only issue would be the padded/quilted armor worn in the tropics. I took some of the more European armor figures and put them with my FL Pavia Landsknechts and they fit right in.

Yes 16th century... The padded quilted pieces I think could be also present in Europe... sort of a cheaper alternative. I'm planning to build up these CQ types for an European set up and will in some cases repaint some of the legs to get more variety.
I have a few of the Pavia FL types and they are quite nice, will check out how they fit. In my case, as I have not seen it mentioned here at all, my older FL figures are not "ageing gracefully". They are gettting VERY fragile over time. So no plans for any more of those...
The other advantage of these Italian Wars is the large amount of mercenaries used, so you could get away with Landsknecht types on both sides...

Just tested placing a couple of JJD swordsmen with my FL Landsknecht and French knights and the fit is indeed PERFECT!
 
Last edited:
I have some of the FL renaissance figures and agree some are showing signs of aging, and not in a good way. They do make a colorful display nonetheless. The JJD figures would fit into a Pavia setting and I also have a few Kronprinz which focus more on the Spanish. I am thinking of getting FL/Kronprinz French mounted knights but FL did not put their on sale so quite expensive.

The JJD figures may be a bit early for the siege of Malta but I would love to do a diorama of the Ottomans against Valetta's walls one day.

Gary
 
Just ordered a couple of the mounted Kronprinz Pavia figures. The Alonso Pita de Veiga personality figure and his squire/flag bearer. This will be go with the extra JJD CQ I'm getting
KP also makes some nice looking French mounted figures. Not planning on any of those... I have the FL Francis I figure and the downed knight, both figures sorounded by about 12 figures! jajaja! The FL are very nice, but as you mention pricey.

A little later in the time frame, I finally got out of their boxes a group of KP "Miracle of Empel" figures. Like these a lot. Emilio at KP is also very helpful and if you want multiples of a particular figure, he can paint them differently on request.
 
I have some of the FL renaissance figures and agree

The JJD figures may be a bit early for the siege of Malta but I would love to do a diorama of the Ottomans against Valetta's walls one day.

Gary

I am building up a force for just this type of scene. Haven’t decided whether to do Fort St Elmo or the attacks against the city curtain walls.
 
I am building up a force for just this type of scene. Haven’t decided whether to do Fort St Elmo or the attacks against the city curtain walls.

Here’s what I have collected as a few months ago.

https://forum.treefrogtreasures.com/showthread.php?74814-Great-Siege-of-Malta-1565&p=921942#post921942
 
Ottomans look good. You will probably know better than me if the defenders are the right fit. They were Templar knights and Maltese militia.

I assume you mean Knights of John / Hospitaller Knights rather than Templar who were destroyed by the French King in about 1309 (date is from memory and might be slightly off).

There were also Spanish sailors and soldiers plus a few other small motley contingents.

I am playing fast and loose with some of the figures that span about 100 years on the Latin side and even have a couple of Janissaries with muskets from the 1700s that are hard to see from kits painted in Russia.
 
What kind of problems are you having with your older FL figures?

Joe

Thin metal pieces, become VERY brittle and in some cases(swords, muskets, slings, stirrups, etc.) are deformed. Worst offenders so far are some of the VERY early Napoleonic Bavarian Infantry's muskets. Have removed some from display as I can't figure out how to repair the muskets that are severely deformed. Any part of a FL that you see somewhat bent, better to leave alone as if you try to "bend back" to straight, it will break for sure. I would describe it as a type of the dreaded "lead rot" but specific to thin pieces. I have replaced some swords and sabers with very thin styrene sheet.
The FL are amazing figures and I treasure the ones I have in my collection greatly. They can be displayed next to the St Petersburg Russian figures and stand up nicely. I just hope what I have noticed is due to early materials and maybe is due to the hot climate of where I live.
 
Thin metal pieces, become VERY brittle and in some cases(swords, muskets, slings, stirrups, etc.) are deformed. Worst offenders so far are some of the VERY early Napoleonic Bavarian Infantry's muskets. Have removed some from display as I can't figure out how to repair the muskets that are severely deformed. Any part of a FL that you see somewhat bent, better to leave alone as if you try to "bend back" to straight, it will break for sure. I would describe it as a type of the dreaded "lead rot" but specific to thin pieces. I have replaced some swords and sabers with very thin styrene sheet.
The FL are amazing figures and I treasure the ones I have in my collection greatly. They can be displayed next to the St Petersburg Russian figures and stand up nicely. I just hope what I have noticed is due to early materials and maybe is due to the hot climate of where I live.

Thank you for describing what you've experienced with some of your FL figures. I'm sorry to hear of this. Maybe it's something that only happens with the very early figures, like you've found. I've typically found FL to be rather sturdy in construction for being such intricate figures. But then again I don't have any of the very early figures your described. It sounds like the metal is possibly porous or too hard. I'm not an engineer, but some malleable metals can turn brittle over time due to oxidation, so maybe that's what's happening.
I guess it's part of the risk when making parts on figures that are accurately scaled, as opposed to oversized weapons that don't look quite right but are less likely to sustain damage. I really hope it's not a lead rot type situation like you mentioned. I have mostly FL Vikings and Crusaders. I have a few Romans, barbarians, Greeks & WW2 figures too, and they are holding up well. At first I thought you might be having a problem like I have experienced with some Russian figures in that some develop loose arms, shields, etc. over time. I think that's just from poor assembly, and I'm glad to hear at least that's not what you're experiencing.
 
Thank you for describing what you've experienced with some of your FL figures. I'm sorry to hear of this. Maybe it's something that only happens with the very early figures, like you've found. I've typically found FL to be rather sturdy in construction for being such intricate figures. But then again I don't have any of the very early figures your described. It sounds like the metal is possibly porous or too hard. I'm not an engineer, but some malleable metals can turn brittle over time due to oxidation, so maybe that's what's happening.
I guess it's part of the risk when making parts on figures that are accurately scaled, as opposed to oversized weapons that don't look quite right but are less likely to sustain damage. I really hope it's not a lead rot type situation like you mentioned. I have mostly FL Vikings and Crusaders. I have a few Romans, barbarians, Greeks & WW2 figures too, and they are holding up well. At first I thought you might be having a problem like I have experienced with some Russian figures in that some develop loose arms, shields, etc. over time. I think that's just from poor assembly, and I'm glad to hear at least that's not what you're experiencing.

I haven’t seen it on the Vikings, Crusaders,
Romans or Greeks. And I have almost every figure from those lines. I have seen it on the original Prussian release of the SYW but not on anything else. Nor have I seen it on any of my Napoleonics, but I only have a few of the first 100 releases.
 
Thin metal pieces, become VERY brittle and in some cases(swords, muskets, slings, stirrups, etc.) are deformed. Worst offenders so far are some of the VERY early Napoleonic Bavarian Infantry's muskets. Have removed some from display as I can't figure out how to repair the muskets that are severely deformed. Any part of a FL that you see somewhat bent, better to leave alone as if you try to "bend back" to straight, it will break for sure. I would describe it as a type of the dreaded "lead rot" but specific to thin pieces. I have replaced some swords and sabers with very thin styrene sheet.
The FL are amazing figures and I treasure the ones I have in my collection greatly. They can be displayed next to the St Petersburg Russian figures and stand up nicely. I just hope what I have noticed is due to early materials and maybe is due to the hot climate of where I live.

I don’t think it’s lead rot. I think some of the earliest weapons were made out of something that got too hard and brittle over time. I have not had the issue on 100s of figures I have bought in the last 12 years. Just a few of the earliest.
 
I don’t think it’s lead rot. I think some of the earliest weapons were made out of something that got too hard and brittle over time. I have not had the issue on 100s of figures I have bought in the last 12 years. Just a few of the earliest.

I'm glad you haven't had any issues with your figures. I haven't had any of those problems either, thankfully.

Joe
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top