New Releases for May 2020 - Age of Arthur (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
NEW RELEASES FOR MAY 2020
THE AGE OF ARTHUR
THE NORMAN ARMY


nm-03_3_.jpg


William Duke of Normandy (c. 1028-1087), usually known as William the Conqueror was the first Norman King of England, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087.

In the 1050’s and early 1060’s, William became a contender for the throne of England held by the Childless Edward the Confessor, his first cousin removed.
There were other claimants. Including the powerful English earl Harold Godwinson, whom Edward had named as King on his deathbed, in January 1066.

William argued that Edward had previously promised the throne to him, and that Harold had sworn to support his claim.

Throughout the summer of 1066, William assembled an army and an invasion fleet in Normandy. This force included, in addition to troops from William’s own territories of Normandy and Maine, large numbers of mercenaries, allies and volunteers from Brittany, Northeast France and Flanders.

The Battle of Hastings took place on the 14[SUP]th[/SUP] October 1066. Although the numbers on each side were about equal, William had the advantage of having both cavalry, infantry and many archers.

Harold had only foot soldiers, and few archers. The English formed a shield wall along a ridge, and were initially so effective that the invading Norman army was repeatedly thrown back with heavy casualties.

Towards the end of the day some of William’s Breton troops panicked and fled, with some of the English troops pursuing the fleeing Bretons. These English troops who had broken ranks, were themselves attacked and destroyed by the Norman mounted knights.

Norman knights were armoured warriors that fought on horseback, with lance , sword and shield. These were the Norman “secret weapon” as nothing like them had been seen before in England. There were between 1,000-2,000 Norman knights in William’s army, and it was these troops which proved decisive to the invading army’s victory.

Two further Norman retreats were feigned, which once again drew the English into pursuit and expose them to repeated attacks by the Norman cavalry.

It appears that the decisive event was Harold’s death, of which there are differing versions which are told.
William of Jumieges claimed that Harold was killed by the Duke himself.

The Bayeux tapestry shows Harold’s death by an arrow to the eye.



nm-01.jpg




NM-01
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
WILLIAM, DUKE OF NORMANDY.
(2 pcs)

nm-01_2_.jpg




nm-02.jpg


NM-02

THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
NORMAN KNIGHT
(2 pcs)

nm-02_2_.jpg



nm-03_1_.jpg


NM-03

THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
NORMAN KNIGHT WITH PAPAL STANDARD.
(3 pcs)

nm-03_2_.jpg
 
Three more Norman knights . . . Welcome to Hastings gentlemen. Can't wait to add these to my AoA collection.
Mike
 
is it my eyes or the picture...or is Williams helmet on crooked?
Mike, I believe you are right, but there is a reason, if I have this correct. During the battle, a rumor went through the ranks that William had been killed. In order to put the lie to this rumor, William pushed his helmet back on his head so that his men might recognize him and realize that he was still quite alive. I think John is modelling this particular moment. At least that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I'm sure there are a few Hastings scholars on the forum that can say yea or nay to my theory. -- Al
 
Mike, I believe you are right, but there is a reason, if I have this correct. During the battle, a rumor went through the ranks that William had been killed. In order to put the lie to this rumor, William pushed his helmet back on his head so that his men might recognize him and realize that he was still quite alive. I think John is modelling this particular moment. At least that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I'm sure there are a few Hastings scholars on the forum that can say yea or nay to my theory. -- Al

Al...I did not know that...his hand does seem to be raising his helmet...thank you for the explanation...

https://www.english-heritage.org.uk...orman-conquest/what-happened-battle-hastings/


[FONT=&quot]Harold’s forces repulsed the first Norman attacks, the English battle-axes cleaving the Norman shields and armour. William’s forces regrouped, but then some of them on the left flank, hearing a rumour that the duke had been killed, fled in panic. Some of the English began to pursue them down the hill.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]To stop panic spreading and rally his troops, William rode out in front of them, raising his helmet to show his face and shouting: ‘Look at me! I live, and with God’s help I shall conquer!’ In a successful counter-charge, his troops surrounded the pursuing English forces on a hillock and annihilated them. The immediate crisis had passed.[/FONT]
 
Last edited:
Mike, I believe you are right, but there is a reason, if I have this correct. During the battle, a rumor went through the ranks that William had been killed. In order to put the lie to this rumor, William pushed his helmet back on his head so that his men might recognize him and realize that he was still quite alive. I think John is modelling this particular moment. At least that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I'm sure there are a few Hastings scholars on the forum that can say yea or nay to my theory. -- Al

That's pretty much spot on the story Al. This is how John is depicting William - the moment in the heat of battle when he lifts his helmet so that he can be recognized.
Mike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top