News Update October 7th, 2024 - The Ancients, Battle of Kadesh (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
JJDESIGNS NEWS UPDATE 7th OCTOBER 2024
THE ANCIENTS

THE BATTLE OF KADESH, 1274BC
THE HITTITE EMPIRE

Between the 15th and 13th centuries BC, the Hittites were one of the dominant powers of the near east, and clashed with the other main three powers, Egypt, the middle Assyrians and the empire of Mitanni.
The Hittite prosperity was mostly dependent on control of the trade routes and natural metal resources.
Because of the importance of northern Syria to the vital routes linking the Cilician gates with Mesopotamia, defense of this area was crucial, and was challenged by the Egyptian expansion under Pharaoh Ramesses II.

HITT012024-M.jpg


The Battle of Kadesh took place in the 13th century BC between the Egyptian Empire led by pharaoh Ramesses II and the Hittite Empire led by king Muwatalli II.
Their armies engaged each other at the Orontes river, just upstream of lake Homs and near the archaeological site of the fortified city of Kadesh.
It is generally dated to May 1274 BC, as accounted by Egyptian chronology, and is the earliest pitched battle in recorded history for which details of tactics and formations are known.
It is believed to be the largest battle ever fought involving chariots, numbering a total of around 6,000.

Kadesh remains a popular battle with historians because of the detailed pictorial representations left by Rameses II on the walls of temples at Thebes, Karnak, Luxor, Agydos and Abu Simbel.

As Rameses army marched up from the south, the Hittite king Muwatallis II, launched his attack by despatching 2,500 chariots in four bodies across the Orontes via a ford just below the fortified city of Kadesh.
The Egyptian records describe how these chariots cut through the army of Ra in its middle, while they were marching without knowing and without being drawn up for battle, which broke the army and caused panic. The fleeing army fell into confusion against the army of Amun the second Egyptian army to the north, which also fell into confusion and flight.
The Hittites followed up this initial attack and finally encircled the Egyptian camp. Rameses’ personal leadership and tactical dexterity in the swirling chariot battle saved him at the decisive moment, and he was able to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

The outcome of the Battle of Kadesh is uncertain, although the timely arrival of Egyptian reinforcements prevented a total Hittite victory, the Egyptians did force the Hittites to take refuge in the fortress city of Kadesh, but their own losses prevented them from sustaining a siege.

HITT022024-M.jpg


Muwatalli II was a king of the Hittite Empire. He was the eldest son of Mursili II and Queen Gassulawiya. He is best known for relocating the Hittite capital to Tarhuntassa, appointing his brother Hattusili as governor in Hattusa, and fighting Ramesses II in the Battle of Kadesh.

The Hittite chariot was a key component of the military arsenal of the Hittite Empire during the late Bronze Age, roughly between the 17th and 12th centuries BCE.
The design of the Hittite Chariots are primarily known through the Kadesh reliefs, which depict a number of vehicles. These vehicles are depicted with an axle which passes beneath the centre of a heavy box shaped cab. These “heavy” chariots represent the Anatolian type, from the heart of the Hittite empire.
They were crewed by three men whose combined weight would have made impractical the placement of an axle at the rear of the vehicle. Six spoked wheels were also standard.

HITT032024-M.jpg


The three man crew consisted of an unshielded charioteer, a shield bearer who doubled as a spearman, and an unshielded warrior armed with a thrusting spear.
The first two wore lightweight textile armour, and the third a bronze helmet and three quarter length scale armour.

These robust heavy war chariots were well suited for close combat. Tactics were therefore based on aggressive mass onslaught of chariots, preferably dispatched before the opponent could properly deploy their forces.

Against enemy chariotry the Hittite chariots would choose to charge into contact, aiming to thrust at their opponents with their spears. In the melee the heavier weapons and numerous crew would tell against lighter chariotry.
Although Hittite chariots with the centrally placed axle were less manoeuvrable, the extra crewman meant the vehicle could afford to lose a man without becoming ineffective. Employing spear and chariot together was an innovation in weapons development. It represented new military tactics based on the aggressive use of the chariot in close-quarter combat.
These new techniques demanded different military skills and together with the use of heavy body armour put new demands on the training of chariot warriors.

HITT042024-M.jpg


Battles were won and lost by the chariot contingents, with the infantry playing no more than a back up role. Lightly armed warriors, known as chariot runners would accompany the chariots into battle, and would dispatch any disabled enemy charioteers during the engagement.

HITT052024-M.jpg


At the Battle of Kadesh, the Egyptian documents tell us that the Hittite forces numbered around 47,500, including 3,500 chariots and 37,000 infantry.
The basic equipment of a Hittite soldier would have included little protective armour, almost certainly due to the fact that the troops were traveling long distances on campaign. They only wore a leather helmet with cheek and neck flaps, a shield made of leather stretched over a wooden frame, a short stabbing sword or dagger and a thrusting spear.

The Hittite king would have drawn heavily on all his available resources for this battle with Egypt, and it would have included contingents from all parts of his realm, and an unknown number of mercenaries.
Throughout their history the Hittites were faced with chronic manpower shortages. Campaigns conducted against an enemy far from their homeland, would cause serious problems, and seriously depleted the homeland’s defense capabilities.
Hittite kings usually sought to resolve crises by means other than military conflict, hence the importance to resolution by diplomacy rather than brutal force.
When military confrontation was unavoidable a king had to use his available resources economically and efficiently, taking every opportunity to supplement these resources with reinforcements from his vassal or allied states in or near the campaign area.

In the peak period of the Hittite empire, the standing army was probably some tens of thousands strong.
During troubles or unrest, a general levy of the Hittite population was gathered to swell the ranks of the professional army.
Troops were called up from the various homeland regions as well as from the vassal states and other subject territories.

HITT062024-M.jpg


The Hittite homelands were vulnerable to attack from all directions, and Hattusa was burnt to the ground sometime around 1180 BC following a combined onslaught from new waves of invaders, the Kaskians, Phrygians and the Bryges.
The Hittite kingdom was soon to vanish from historical records, with much of the territory being seized by Assyria.

Many internal issues also contributed to this collapse, and can be considered as part of the larger Bronze Age collapse.

The first of the Hittite sets will be available in November 2024.

Best wishes,

john jenkins
 
une tuerie !!!
Le char de combat et son équipage sont remarquables !
l'infanterie hittite est particulièrement soignée dans ses poses...
Les archers syriens, absolument magnifiques !
Ma carte de crédit va chauffer !
 
Everything John does is magnificent but isn't he stretching things a bit too far with all these different lines? There doesn't seem to be any focus.
 
Everything John does is magnificent but isn't he stretching things a bit too far with all these different lines? There doesn't seem to be any focus.
I think there is focus on the Egyptian New Kingdom and its enemies. It folds into the Troy range very nicely. The Punic Wars have been a longstanding range while John has been covering the Greco/Persian Wars for a while. I agree it keeps me poor with so much on offer every month and I will need to stop collecting some sets such as the Fur Trade just to be able to buy from other manufacturers.
 
Everything John does is magnificent but isn't he stretching things a bit too far with all these different lines? There doesn't seem to be any focus.
I think many of us have a favourite series,we would like to see John spend a little more time on developing. Of course there are lines that leave me cold, but those from periods of history I do find more than a little interesting I have to try and stop myself from jumping in and collecting a range that I don't have the space or finances to follow, as I'm sure many of us also feel like doing !
 
He does do a good Chariot. Think i am with you PxP, i will go with aKingly chariots and the foot soldiers. I have been spending a lot each month, its worth it but not sustainable. As others have said, too much good stuff for toy soldier freaks.
 
concernant le développement du thème Qadesh de John, je trouve que l'infanterie légère égyptienne est peu exploitée...
3 figurines.. J'espère que John ne s'arrêtera pas là, il serait bon de créer une ligne de combat comme le projet présenté de l'infanterie hittite avec des poses originales présentant des lances courtes (type zoulou !) et des petites haches, armes très répandues dans l'infanterie légère...
 
regarding the development of John's Qadesh theme, I find that the Egyptian light infantry is underexploited...
3 figurines.. I hope John won't stop there, it would be good to create a combat line like the project presented of the Hittite infantry with original poses presenting short spears (Zulu type!) and small axes, weapons very widespread in the light infantry. Thats Francis translated.
I agree we need more Egyptian infantry. We have 6 poses with 2 shield colours. We also have the archers, and more coming. But regarding the infantrymen and axemen, if you buy them all its only 12 figures. We definitely need more Egyptian infantry.
 
I like how John does a whole series and does it as completely as possible. That said, we will have to weigh Egyptians vs Hittites and even Incas. Getting the best of each range is our answer.
Happy Ancients Collecting!
Paddy
 
I like how John does a whole series and does it as completely as possible. That said, we will have to weigh Egyptians vs Hittites and even Incas. Getting the best of each range is our answer.
Happy Ancients Collecting!
Paddy
That’s a good way to look at it, Paddy! I for one am happy for all of the various options. You never know what’s coming next month!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top