Blowtorch
Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,754
As the length of a Ju 52 was approximately 60 feet while the Owl was 51, both large planes, the criteria would seem to be not length but whether Figarti thinks they could sell 100 or so.
Problem with these big planes is having the space for themCan't think of a more versatile airplane in a toy soldier context. You can pose paras with it, refugees, supplies, politicians, even the theatre colors aren't critical as they hopped around to wherever the need was urgent
Problem with these big planes is having the space for them
Agree that the size of the aircraft seems unimportant with Figarti. The mediums they use allow the larger size to be done whilst retaining detail and, importantly, keeping the weight down. The Owl still for me is the best thing they have done almost faultless IMO. The only thing I did not like was the figure.
About time a Mossie was made
Mitch
Yes, that's true. I had nowhere to exhibit the Owl. It was just too big. One thing that helps however is having a stand.
Brad,
When you make that move out West, consider those display issues when house hunting!
Best,
Marc
Problem with these big planes is having the space for them
here's a reference for some common plane sizes. Me 109 kept constant. I threw in some Vietnam choppers, including a big one in case some of you were going to ask to go on some long range missions! After pulling these recognition models out, I fear the Ju-52 is a pipe dream
View attachment 115795View attachment 115796View attachment 115797