Regiment de La Sarre, Heading to Ticonderoga - French Indian War (1 Viewer)

Fraxinus

Master Sergeant
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
1,257
Ltn. Col. Étienne-Guillaume de Senezergues, Regiment de La Sarre (JJD Club Set 22). Lead by de Senezergues, a company of the 2nd Battalion of the La Sarre Regiment plus a small detachment from the 2nd Battalion of the Languedoc Regiment with an escort of allied Indian warriors head south towards Ticonderoga. Montcalm had 18 Indian allies at Ticonderoga, so 18 warriors are included in the front row. Sergeant and corporal ranks would be indicated on the cuffs, and in the case of the sergeant, it would be a narrow gold or silver braid at the top of the cuff. Corporals had a braiding pattern on their cuffs as well, but the identification pattern varied by regiment.

During the French and Indian War, the French in Canada did not have the manpower to increase the strength of individual battalions. They were nearly always under strength at a maximum of about 500 men per battalion and often at 100 or so men less. When deployed for war, the British routinely packed individual companies with many more privates to increase the strength of the battalion, so that there were often 750 men per battalion. Scottish battalions could exceed 1,000 men. As such, French companies are generally much smaller in size their British counterparts.

Except for the two Berry Battalions originally organized for deployment to India, Montcalm's Army was organized as 13 companies per battalion, not 18 companies per battalion as in metropolitan France. British battalions kept the company size at 10.

From then Seven Years War Page: French Army Infantry Organization

http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=French_Infantry_Organisation

A fusilier (battalion "hat") company of regular infantry battalions consisted of 42 men:

• 1 captain
• 1 lieutenant
• 2 sergeants
• 3 corporals
• 3 lance corporals (ansepessades')
• 31 fusilier
• 1 drummer

A company of grenadiers consisted of 48 men:

• 1 captain
• 1 lieutenant
• 1 sub-lieutenant
• 2 sergeants
• 3 corporals
• 3 lance corporals (ansepessades')
• 36 grenadiers
• 1 drummer

In the mid-18th century, the word "company" was considered as the administrative designation with word "platoon" saved for the tactical applications. So simplified, 1 platoon = 1 company. This holds true for the British as well. In modern armies, a platoon is much smaller than a company, but not in the mid-18th Century.

As the French lost the Seven Years War, they were motivated to correct the deficiencies exposed and moved quickly to reform their army. In France, many books and manuals were written, criticized and debated, and rewritten over a period of the next 35 years in time for the rise of Napoleon. By 1763, the number of companies per battalion was reduced to eight with 1 additional company of grenadiers. The eight fusilier companies were to have a strength of three officers and 63 enlisted men with the single grenadier company having three officers but only 52 men. A battalion would then be 28 officers (counting a sub-assistant major) and 556 enlisted men. The organization was then much closer to the British System, but not identical.





















 
Last edited:
I'm guessing, but it's only about 5 poses with lots of strategically placed mirrors:tongue:..Michael
 
For clarification. there are 40 plus different figure sculptures, not counting horses, mules or the wagon. As it regards, marching figures with muskets on their shoulders, there are 10 different figures. As it regards mirrors, there is only 1 ^&grin.
 
Impressive collection! The British are sure in for one hell of a brawl when these guys march onto the battlefield. {sm2}

Cheers,

Brendan
 
Very impressive seeing row on row of these wonderful JJD figures en-masse :)

John
 
Brendan, Nod on the Brawl.

A few old photos, really should take some newer ones. But not this week.





 
Last edited:
Now we know where all the marching figures went.^&grin Nice collection
Mark
 
What a terrific collection. It was the early JJD POA figures, the 47th line infantry and the La Sarre infantry, that first got me collecting his figures and they are still amongst my favorites. -- Al
 
Someone asked "Why two regimental flags?"

When deployed on a broad front of several regiments, as at Quebec or Ticonderoga, one regimental flag would be placed at each end of the regiments position on the front --- one to the far left and one to the far right of the position --- identical flags. So it was relatively easy for the French to determine the proper position for troops and send messengers back and forth with tactical directions and intelligence. The British had the King's Colors plus a single regimental flag - again, two flags, but very different designs and colors.

The French system was just easier and more efficient, at least while both flags were visible. British had standardized rules for which flag was placed to the left and which to the right.

I could easily be wrong about this, but I think the highest French commanding officers also had their own flags (white) --- Montcalm.

Again I could be wrong, but at least at this point in time, waving a white flag was not a sign of surrender. The surrender "signal" might have been a red flag --- very unsure.
 
Last edited:
Ken...

looking at your collection always dazzles me...

can't wait to see them on display in your fort...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top