I love the model I have but I think that, ultimately, I prefer the JJD SE-5 and this is mainly due to the subtle weathering and especially due to the fabric details that JJD achieved, ie., the blousing effect around the stitching. Still, I would not give up the Samhongsa SE-5.:wink2: -- Al
For our other readers, the blousing effect that Al and I have referenced was molded into the fuselage of the JJ model:
A similar view from the Samhongsa model:
As I mentioned earlier, the blousing is missing on the latter picture altogether. The stitching strikes me as less believable, and the mounting step is only implied in relief.
To flesh out the visual differences a bit more, let me post two additional pics. Below, the undersides of both models' tail-surfaces, Jenkins' first:
Let me first note that just about everything is there on BOTH models. True, the second lacks some surface detail that's exhibited in the first. To my eye, however, Jenkins' "wins" in this view because of the subtlety with which the parts have been molded. Among the effects that Jenkins' employs are simulated grommets molded into the horizontal stabilizer and elevator. Add in the wash and pigmentation that's been applied and the difference in fidelity of rendering is pretty dramatic.
In closing, I have to admit that neither model is "perfect." Each has considerable strengths when viewed through the prism of its manufacturing technique. I guess the ideal solution would be to combine machined parts (which in some ways appears to be superior to photo etch), pressed metal (which is great for shapes like wheels) and molded parts (like the fuselage of the Jenkins" model). Boy, but that would make for one heck of a shock when the invoice arrived!{eek3}
Thanks for reading,
-Moe
