Steve Irwin (1 Viewer)

Hockoy

Guest
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
42
I thought it would be good to pay your respects to Steve Irwin since he was such a good conservationalist these days. In these modern times where nature is spat upon, Steve Irwin kept it alive with enthusiastic documentaries, and strong family and personal moral values. Rock on Steve. I hope you rest peacefully in heaven.
 
Last edited:
I agree, I always enjoyed his zest for life, and genuine love of animals!

Njja
 
I feel really bad about the whole thing but with that guy you could almost see that kind of an end coming to the guy with the way he would always get in the face of these dangerous animals fish and reptiles all the time just taunting them. I feel real bad for the wife and kids. I liked his show and he seemed like he was a nice guy, my daughter would watch the show all the time.
 
I always laughed when I saw the Mad TV parody’, they were quite the hoot. His enthusiasm and zest for life were much to be admired. At least he went doing what he loved to do.

It is too bad for his children. It is so sad when really young kids can’t grow up with their fathers.
 
"This is a really bad idea..."

"I'm just gonna chase this little sheep down..."

"That's not niiice..."

RIP.
 
I really loved his show, and feel terrible about his death (a stingray of all things), but you kind of had to expect this. I have never seen anyone so eager to get in the face of poisonous and otherwise lethal creatures. Eventually the odds catch up with anyone, even someone as good as the Crocodile Hunter.
 
Yep very sad,to young to go.God bless his family.

Rob
 
Being an Australian that works in conservation management I must admit I sometimes found Steve's antics a bit over the top, and at times somewhat embarasing. But you certainly had to love the guy for the increased exposure he gave to wildlife, particularly the Australian fauna. I believe his shows were unique as his close encounters helped other people to see these animals as being individuals with needs that only humans could ensure.

Unlike most other countries there are few Australian animals that are out to kill you for food. Crocs and the occassional hungry shark being two of the very few. However there are literally hundreds of Australian species that are certainly capable of killing you if you get in their way. Which of course is what happened to poor Steve Irwin.

You just never know what wildlife you are about to encounter next downunder. Only recently we had a Brush Turkey in our yard and two weeks ago I found a deer in the bush about five miles from town that came up to me. It was a young animal that I suspect had escaped from a nearby deer park and it wasn't very frightened of people.

Australia Zoo is only a short drive from my home and I worked there for a while before moving to habitat conservation work. The zoo employs over five hundred people and the Irwins were rarely there as they travelled overseas alot, so I never got to meet the man in person. However his local reputation as a genuine caring person was well known and his death has been a major blow to the district.
 
Have you guys overseas seen any news about Germaine Greer attacking Steve Irwin's methods in her column in The Guardian etc? Granted Steve Irwin was more popular in the US than downunder as he was considered a bit of a dill at times and to over the top for our culture. However he was still popular with many Aussies, especially children. If I was Germaine Greer I wouldn't return to Australia for some time, if ever.

Of course the guy had his faults and did some silly things such as feeding a crocodile whilst holding his one month old son. But his faults were far out-weighed by the good he did for wildlife and conservation. In fact it would surprise me if anyone could name a person who has made animals and conservation more popular than they are now.
 
This show was a disgusting and crass exploitation of wildlife and SI for $'s. The people responsible for promoting this type of behaviour should be ashamed.
 
Have you guys overseas seen any news about Germaine Greer attacking Steve Irwin's methods in her column in The Guardian etc? Granted Steve Irwin was more popular in the US than downunder as he was considered a bit of a dill at times and to over the top for our culture. However he was still popular with many Aussies, especially children. If I was Germaine Greer I wouldn't return to Australia for some time, if ever.

Of course the guy had his faults and did some silly things such as feeding a crocodile whilst holding his one month old son. But his faults were far out-weighed by the good he did for wildlife and conservation. In fact it would surprise me if anyone could name a person who has made animals and conservation more popular than they are now.


We heard about her column here, Sounds like shes just trying to garner herself more publicity.
If she had even an ounce of dignity she would pull her head in and
let his family grieve in peace.
 
We heard about her column here, Sounds like shes just trying to garner herself more publicity.
If she had even an ounce of dignity she would pull her head in and
let his family grieve in peace.

I agree, I feel its unfair to put the boot into the guy before he's in the ground as they say. Germaine Greer has always thrived on being controversial, usually mixed with a large degree of vitriotic jealousy. However I have to partially agree with her about the methods he used. While studying for my degree we were constantly reminded to limit our impact on wildlife, which includes a minimal amount of handling.

However, from an animals point of view I'd prefer a boof head shouting in my ear for 30 seconds to some scientist jabbing me with needles, piercing my ear with an ear tag and strapping a heavy radio collar on my neck for twelve months or so.

In addition, Irwin's method of hands on wrangling was meant to limit injury to animals when capturing them for public education etc. For example, the traditional method of capturing a snake up untill Irwin came along was to jab a metal stick onto the back of its neck then pick it up. Which invariably made said snake VERY angry, and you haven't really seen anger until you've seen a pissed off Taipan.

With crocodiles, the traditional method was to spot-light them at night from a dingy and jab them with a small harpoon with a rope attached, sort of Moby Dick style. Despite their rough exterior, crocodiles are rather vulnerable to infection, as are most reptiles. Indeed, a rusty harpoon in the neck or back doesn't do anyone any favours.

Combat et al. Yes, the guy did make a large amount of money out of exhibiting animals, usually with over enthusiatic handling. However he also put most of that money back into protecting them. He could have built a number of large houses and bought a fleet of expensive sports cars etc to drive around in. And frankly few people blame celebrities when they do those things.

However the fact is that Irwin ploughed the bulk of the money he made back into protecting animals and conserving habitats. He bought up large areas of land in a number of countries to save threatened species and this has only recently been made public. He lived on a rather modest bungalow in the zoo compound and had recently commenced construction of the largest animal hospital in the world.

So imho his detractors (which has included me on occassion) should cut the guy a bit of slack, or at least wait until he's buried, and his family and friends have had some period of mourning.
 
I'm dating myself, but Marlin Perkins of Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom.:)

No you're not dating yourself Steve, and you did surprise me :) I had forgotten about the quietly spoken Marlin Perkins. He is amongst the more sensitive stars of animal protectors, together with Gerald Durrel, David Attenborough etc. These are my type of naturalist as they teach people to respect and protect animals while leaving them alone.

Steve Irwin was more your 'Jungle' Jack Hanna type, with the animal in their or someone elses face routine. Of course this method invariably produces controversy as few animals behave well when being filmed under bright lights in noisy entertainment environments. Even the best behaved animal (and person) will often lash out under these circumstances.

The fact is, everything is entertainment these days. And the bigger the show the larger the audience, which results in a greater chance of increasing wildlife awareness. I guess the best thing you can say about people like Steve Irwin etc is that they do mean well. They just have different personalities to most naturalists and therefore different methods of getting the wildlife and conservation message across to the public. Btw, I wonder how much money David Attenborough has donated to wildlife funds etc. He's a quiet guy, so I guess we'll never know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top