Vehicles or Figures or both? (1 Viewer)

Rob

Four Star General
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
26,622
Was wondering if any of you guys started out collecting either just figs or AFV's and then gradually it all became one collection. I started with figures and after adding Wittmans last Tiger and the Jagdpanther I was no longer collecting figures or vehicles but collecting K&C, I stopped differentiating long ago, but do any of you actually stick to one or the other?

Rob
 
From being a kid it was both figures and AFV's and it has stayed that way in everything I have bought.
Mitch
 
For me it was AFVs first and then I ended up buying a figure set or two to add to the display. The rest is history.

Andy
 
I started with just AFVs but over time began to add figures sets until I had quite a few. Now it's almost entirely AFVs again unless a figure set comes out that has something unique about it.

Terry
 
Started with figures. One day many years ago I saw a Panther done by KC (the early Ambush Panther) and I was hooked on AFV's as well. Collect both now, but it is largely becoming AFV's and aircraft only as costs keep rising. -- Al
 
Soon as Mike Neville showed me the D day figures I was hooked, before I knew it I was buying figures and AFV's alike,this hobby is very addictive!:);)

Rob
 
It was figures first for me, but I feel like a f*ck*ng fool now, as the vehicles used to be £10 more than the figures and if that's not annoying enough, a 4 figure set was only £74.95 then, so a vehicles was £84.95, god what a fool! :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::(
 
arnhem44mad...

It happens but, it was not all that long ago now is a better time as disco stuff has really slowed down so, collectors have more time to get the stuff they want
Mitch
 
Started with figures. One day many years ago I saw a Panther done by KC (the early Ambush Panther) and I was hooked on AFV's as well. Collect both now, but it is largely becoming AFV's and aircraft only as costs keep rising. -- Al

Rob,
About 50 years ago it started with plastic kits.In the beginning there were only airplanes available ( Airfix) Little by little the market expanded and plastic vehicles and soldiers also became popular.I made both.Then,about 10 years later I focused only on uniforms and also switched from plastic to metal.I have about 600 hand painted metal figurines ( all WWII 54mm)in my collection. About 1,5 years ago I discovered K&C.I now collect soldiers as well as AFV's from both K&C and TG.
Guy:)
 
arnhem44mad...

It happens but, it was not all that long ago now is a better time as disco stuff has really slowed down so, collectors have more time to get the stuff they want
Mitch

True, only problem is that Andy's creations are getting better and better and the type of stuff I like and collect is released almost monthly!!:D:Cool:
 
I was heavy into 6th scales figs and also some vehicles. As you can imagine, they take up a lot of space at that scale. I actually 'stumbled' onto KC while visiting a site that caters to 6th scale who had just added King & Country as well...and was instantly hooked. I still build some custom 6th scale figs from time to time, but it's mostly this scale range now as I can now collect the vehicles I've always wanted-not to mention incredible fig sculpting.
mike
 
I was heavy into 6th scales figs and also some vehicles. As you can imagine, they take up a lot of space at that scale. I actually 'stumbled' onto KC while visiting a site that caters to 6th scale who had just added King & Country as well...and was instantly hooked. I still build some custom 6th scale figs from time to time, but it's mostly this scale range now as I can now collect the vehicles I've always wanted-not to mention incredible fig sculpting.
mike

Good points

I have always looked at scales like this- in general-

1/6th- focus is more on the soldier and personal gear. I feel like this range does the best for historical accuracy (depends on company)

1/32nd- great scale for smaller dioramas- not saying you can't do big ones- just a bit pricey- focus is less detail on the troops but you can get vehicles involved

11/72nd- traditional wargaming (ie 10mm-30mm) less detail generally for troops and vehicles- more visually stunning for mammoth battles- gettysburg, dday, etc. Allows someone to look at a huge diorama and visually see the challenges faced on the ground.
 
My first purchase was the winter M10. I was mostly into armor until I saw the crew figures up close.:) Then I noticed the tank rider sets...:eek:
 
Good points

I have always looked at scales like this- in general-

1/6th- focus is more on the soldier and personal gear. I feel like this range does the best for historical accuracy (depends on company)

1/32nd- great scale for smaller dioramas- not saying you can't do big ones- just a bit pricey- focus is less detail on the troops but you can get vehicles involved

11/72nd- traditional wargaming (ie 10mm-30mm) less detail generally for troops and vehicles- more visually stunning for mammoth battles- gettysburg, dday, etc. Allows someone to look at a huge diorama and visually see the challenges faced on the ground.

I couldn't have put it better. I still like to 'kitbash' a 6th scale soldier every now and then-with an eye on theater/unit/gear accuracy-but have really gravitated to this scale for collecting purposes.
mike
 
I started with AFV, then I need troops to support the AFVs. Now I buy both.
I also needed aircover.:eek:
 
EVERYTHING!!! :eek: Airplanes, boats, AFV's, transports, artillery, mounted and standing figures, scenery etc etc etc, you see I have a problem! :D ;)
 
EVERYTHING!!! :eek: Airplanes, boats, AFV's, transports, artillery, mounted and standing figures, scenery etc etc etc, you see I have a problem! :D ;)

Many of us share the same affliction! :eek:
Andy sneezes and the collecting community catches a cold!:D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top