What is your opinion on the LAH series? (1 Viewer)

Looking at the photos of the K&C LAH series at www.sierratoysoldier.com (because Tree Frog Treasures does not display photos of LAH for public viewing), I would say that LAH40 seems to be the most impressive piece. And at a current number 56 sets (LAH01 - LAH56), it is apparent that Andy has many customers who are fascinated with the Nazi Party ceremonies in 1938 Berlin.
Personally, I would rather see Andy spend the time, money, and effort on a World War I combat series of figures rather than LAH, especially since I view WWI as a more significant precursor to WWII than SS marching bands.
As a side note, I think that it is interesting that Andy has included Feldmarschall Gerd Von Runstedt as LAH49, while a late war figure of Adolf Hitler is found in WS35.
 
I've said my piece on this as has Louis and others but I just took a look to see what's included in this set since I haven't studied it extensively and I see there's a figure of Heydrich, one of the most evil figures ever. For the life of me, I don't see how Andy could include him in a set. Yes, you could include Himmler, Rohm and all those thugs but Heydrich? I don't see the need. If you're going to include Heydrich, why not Eichmann and his lot? After all, it's history.
 
I agree with Brad. The only figure of Reinhardt Heydrich I want to see is a set wityh him being blown up in his staff car and then shot by a Czech paratrooper.
 
From a historical point of view, why is Rohm in this series? This is supposed to be 1938. Rohm was murdered in 1934.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top