What WW1 planes would you like JJ to make? (1 Viewer)

[lancer]

As well as the F.E.2d I would also like to see the Sopwith Triplane. It spawned the German fascination with triplanes.

View attachment 116416

There is a possibility that there is a tripe in the pipeline, somewhere. John has expressed an interest in this aircraft, so it is on the radar. Don't know where or when though. -- Al

 

[lancer]

If this isn't too selfish, just keep making the SE5 until I can pick it up in London in March:smile2::wink2:

Rob

I would love to see more JJD SE-5's as they are, IMO, his best aircraft yet. Would love to see McCudden's and the rest of 56 Squadron's 'B' flight. Many possibilities with the SE-5. -- Al

 

[Rob]

I would love to see more JJD SE-5's as they are, IMO, his best aircraft yet. Would love to see McCudden's and the rest of 56 Squadron's 'B' flight. Many possibilities with the SE-5. -- Al

I agree Al, its a great aircraft and a terrific model form JJ. Can't wait to have it flying over my Toy Army Workshop collection, then I'm going to have to get me one of them thar JJ Sopwiths ^&cool

Rob

 

[Isandlwana]

There is a possibility that there is a tripe in the pipeline, somewhere. John has expressed an interest in this aircraft, so it is on the radar. Don't know where or when though. -- Al

Well, I'm asuming Sierra will be posting the new arrivals any day now. Who knows, we may get an allied plane of some description? Fingers crossed.

 

[lancer]

I have a rather odd aircraft request for John. I would like to see JJD make a Morane-Saulnier L, aka the Parasol. This was the French choice as the first designated fighter aircraft for their first designated fighter squadron, MS-12. First seeing action in March, 1915, MS-12 preceded the formation of the more famous German fighter arm. The MS Parasol has a firm grip on it's claim to fame as the mount that France's earliest fighter aces learned their trade in. Such names as Navarre, Garros, D'Oisy, Vedrines, Nungesser, and Guynemer all cut their teeth in combat while flying the Parasol. The Parasol also has a British claim to fame in that RNAS pilot Reginald Warneford brought down a Zeppelin on May 17, 1915 while flying a MS-L, an action for which he was awarded the VC. The color schemes weren't generally very colorful, but the plane is an iconic and important choice. -- Al

While awaiting the new release announcements, I just thought I would revive this and ask again that John give the Parasol a shot. It is a really iconic and important aircraft. Would also like to see a Pfalz D-3 or D-3a done. It was an unsung workhorse that really was a very attractive and streamlined design. -- Al

 

[Combat]

While awaiting the new release announcements, I just thought I would revive this and ask again that John give the Parasol a shot. It is a really iconic and important aircraft. Would also like to see a Pfalz D-3 or D-3a done. It was an unsung workhorse that really was a very attractive and streamlined design. -- Al

The Eindecker is at the top of my list. A Pfalz would be nice as well. I would like to see a few Austro-Hungarian aces in the mix. And if we are really going to put John to work, a Gotha would be a winner even if he makes only a few and it has to be delivered on a fork lift. I'm sure he could sell more than a few even at an inflated price. It would also steal the show in Chicago.

 

[ivanmoe]

At the risk of being selfish (but then this is a place to state what one would like or desire) I'm afraid I have to say the opposite. As John is but one chap with only one pair of hands and I so admire his inventive, intelligent and characterful figure work, I would prefer to see no more planes at all as they can mean only one thing - he's designing those rather than more wonderful sets of figures.

Sorry 'bout that, but that's what I'd rather see - and the question was asked.

Have you ever considered the possibility that JJ went into the airplane business as a vehicle for selling his excellent figures? I'm more of a model collector than a TS, guy, BTW. However, I've purchased all of John's pilots, all of the RFC figures, and all but four of his Germans Kots figures. I've also got a much smaller collection of aviation related figures from other manufacturers, Figarti, Gunn and K&C, ones that I use with 1:32 plastic and diecast models. If I've gone wild purchasing the JJD figures, it's because his model airplanes are not only better than (much of) the competition, but they are also much better supported with figures and other accessories. In other words, John has found a way to expand his customer base, a development that might just be what it takes to keep him afloat, long term. That means more pilots and planes for me, and more TS for you. Just something to think about.

 

[ivanmoe]

I'd love to see JJD do a DH2. However, I make this suggestion realizing that it would cost some considerable amount of $$$ to manufacture. Disclaimer made, I'm all in on the type!

View attachment 132086

 

[historyfan1]

The Eindecker is at the top of my list. A Pfalz would be nice as well. I would like to see a few Austro-Hungarian aces in the mix. And if we are really going to put John to work, a Gotha would be a winner even if he makes only a few and it has to be delivered on a fork lift. I'm sure he could sell more than a few even at an inflated price. It would also steal the show in Chicago.

I think a Zeppelin would really steal the show ^&grin

 

[ivanmoe]

While I'll be glad to add yet another Fokker DR1 to the squadron, I really wish that JJD would put more resources into its very nice Albatros model. I was EXTREMELY impressed with its Blue Maus edition, and would like to see other versions. That of Werner Voss, for instance, would be a knockout:

View attachment 132242

Jenkins has eclipsed the competition in WWI model aircraft with its KotS line, and this would be a good opportunity to go ahead and "seal the deal." Oh, and don't forget a nice figure of Werner to go along with the aircraft replica. :wink2:

 

[RedBaron]

King and Country made one. But there was no weathering on this plane.

While I'll be glad to add yet another Fokker DR1 to the squadron, I really wish that JJD would put more resources into its very nice Albatros model. I was EXTREMELY impressed with its Blue Maus edition, and would like to see other versions. That of Werner Voss, for instance, would be a knockout:

View attachment 132242

Jenkins has eclipsed the competition in WWI model aircraft with its KotS line, and this would be a good opportunity to go ahead and "seal the deal." Oh, and don't forget a nice figure of Werner to go along with the aircraft replica. :wink2:

 

[lancer]

While I'll be glad to add yet another Fokker DR1 to the squadron, I really wish that JJD would put more resources into its very nice Albatros model. I was EXTREMELY impressed with its Blue Maus edition, and would like to see other versions. That of Werner Voss, for instance, would be a knockout:

View attachment 132242

Jenkins has eclipsed the competition in WWI model aircraft with its KotS line, and this would be a good opportunity to go ahead and "seal the deal." Oh, and don't forget a nice figure of Werner to go along with the aircraft replica. :wink2:

Moe, as Red Baron points out, KC has done this bird (and not a bad job, though some inaccuracies), so I wouldn't expect this to be done by John. John's Albatros models are superior and I would expect more of them. I think a Voss triplane is a must have but so far I have been unsuccessful in influencing John. I need more voices in support.:wink2: -- Al

 

[ivanmoe]

Moe, as Red Baron points out, KC has done this bird (and not a bad job, though some inaccuracies), so I wouldn't expect this to be done by John. John's Albatros models are superior and I would expect more of them. I think a Voss triplane is a must have but so far I have been unsuccessful in influencing John. I need more voices in support.:wink2: -- Al

Hi Al,

First, you KNOW that I'd buy the Voss model, right? However, I'm concerned that some collectors would respond to this the same way that they have to the word that Tripe #6 is on it's way..."What, not another (green) (tri)plane!" Also, I struggle with the idea that JJD shouldn't do models that have been done by other TS makers. If that's the case, then the JJD Albatros and Fokker D.VII are in BIG trouble. This in spite of the fact that they are WAY better scale models than brand-x, lack of TS-soldier look, notwithstanding. Finally, in a commercial environment where overlapping product lines are discouraged, how did we end with so many RR armoured cars???:wink2:

 

[lancer]

Hi Al,

First, you KNOW that I'd buy the Voss model, right? However, I'm concerned that some collectors would respond to this the same way that they have to the word that Tripe #6 is on it's way..."What, not another (green) (tri)plane!" Also, I struggle with the idea that JJD shouldn't do models that have been done by other TS makers. If that's the case, then the JJD Albatros and Fokker D.VII are in BIG trouble. This in spite of the fact that they are WAY better scale models than brand-x, lack of TS-soldier look, notwithstanding. Finally, in a commercial environment where overlapping product lines are discouraged, how did we end with so many RR armoured cars???:wink2:

Some good points, Moe, and I actually agree about the repeat product, especially if it is improved and superior. Now, as to more triplanes, it is kind of like my take on Tiger tanks, you can never have too many. The point about further D-7's is a concern because of John's very understandable concern with accuracy. Until the lozenge camo problem is solved in some economical way, the D-7's and other late war color schemes are going to be rare. I don't think John will take shortcuts with the color schemes as was done with the D-7's of another maker. -- Al

 

[ivanmoe]

Until the lozenge camo problem is solved in some economical way, the D-7's and other late war color schemes are going to be rare. I don't think John will take shortcuts with the color schemes as was done with the D-7's of another maker. -- Al

Hi Al,

I think that the traditional approach of modelers to applying the "lozenge pattern" has involved the application of some sort of an overlay, a decal perhaps. I believe that Corgi does this with their 1:48 WWI model airplanes, although theirs is likely a tampo-applied marking, rather than decals. The point is that MOST folks don't approach the issue with a loaded paint-brush. I am completely unsure of where JJD is on this, but I'd love to know more.

View attachment 132426

 

[lancer]

Hi Al,

I think that the traditional approach of modelers to applying the "lozenge pattern" has involved the application of some sort of an overlay, a decal perhaps. I believe that Corgi does this with their 1:48 WWI model airplanes, although theirs is likely a tampo-applied marking, rather than decals. The point is that MOST folks don't approach the issue with a loaded paint-brush. I am completely unsure of where JJD is on this, but I'd love to know more.

View attachment 132426

Moe, the last time I talked with John about this, it wasn't so much a question of decal use as it was a question of shrinkage involving the material used to make the models, thus making decals unusable because of inconsistent surface size. As you know, the lozenge camo extends from edge to edge, making an exact fit important to matching the repeating pattern of the lozenges. Obviously, the hand-applied paint method is way too labor intensive and would involve all sort of inconsistencies, as well. I haven't talked to him in a while about the problems involved so I don't know if any progress has been made, or not. -- Al