First Legion - LWG011 German Stug IV - 5th Panzer Division Wiking (1 Viewer)

wayne556517

Lieutenant General
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
16,908
What are peoples thoughts on this beast, it is still available, was there a problem with it?
 
What are peoples thoughts on this beast, it is still available, was there a problem with it?
The main issue is the absence of anti-magnetic Zimmerit coating, which was present on all tanks and SPGs from December 1943 to September 1944.
Since the Viking Panzer Division received 22 StuG IVs in March 1944, LWG011 should have been coated with zimmerit (as elsewhere LWG012 and NOR089).
And also, still that unrealistic blackened muzzle brake !.
 
I think it excels the most in this area: FL makes the most beautiful tanks. Take a look at the paint work on the side skirts. I think it's a wonderful model.
 
And also, still that unrealistic blackened muzzle brake !.

Mastercom, you might be better served saying your preference is for a non-blackened muzzle brake, because you think it looks better. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and I'm sure there are other collectors who share your sentiment.

However, making a factual declaration that a blackened muzzle brake is unrealistic is just incorrect, especially on a winter whitewashed Stug.

First, batches of KwK 40 and StuK 40 muzzle brakes were literally finished in solid black and installed in AFVs. Second, the photographic record has scores of pictures (like the ones below) of whitewashed Panzer IVs and Stugs with their KwK40/StuK40 muzzle brakes solid black after seeing action. First Legion's treatment of the blackening is actually very realistic, where the muzzle brake itself is black and then there is less powder residue weathering on the cannon barrel the farther it gets away from the muzzle brake.

Screenshot 2025-11-14 at 1.42.42 PM.png

Stug_33_1943-2051341051.jpg

b8300d078357f5d21b423846010ea5e5-3674646383.jpg

Russland_Panzer_IV-6.jpg

img14227-2.jpg
 
Mastercom, you might be better served saying your preference is for a non-blackened muzzle brake, because you think it looks better. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, and I'm sure there are other collectors who share your sentiment.

However, making a factual declaration that a blackened muzzle brake is unrealistic is just incorrect, especially on a winter whitewashed Stug.

First, batches of KwK 40 and StuK 40 muzzle brakes were literally finished in solid black and installed in AFVs. Second, the photographic record has scores of pictures (like the ones below) of whitewashed Panzer IVs and Stugs with their KwK40/StuK40 muzzle brakes solid black after seeing action. First Legion's treatment of the blackening is actually very realistic, where the muzzle brake itself is black and then there is less powder residue weathering on the cannon barrel the farther it gets away from the muzzle brake.

View attachment 358450

View attachment 358451

View attachment 358452

View attachment 358453

View attachment 358454
Hunter, aesthetics aren't really my priority.
What's most important to me is historical accuracy, and I think producing tank models with SYSTEMATICALLY blackened muzzle brakes is more of an artistic choice than a reflection of reality.
Indeed, some period photos as you attached show dark-colored muzzle brakes, but this is far from being the norm.
You mentioned that the 75mm KwK40 and StuK40 guns were literally finished in solid black and installed on the tanks and SPGs.
I have no information on this and would be interested to know your sources if you're willing.
In the documentation on the subject, it's generally accepted that the entire gun barrel was painted with a grey heat resistant primer, either left as is or repainted with camouflage colors.
Like some authors, I thought that the very dark color, especially on whitewash tanks, was due either to the high contrast between Dunkelgrau and white in the black and white photos (before the Dunkelgelb of 1943), or to repeated contact with grease and the various solvents used to clean the gun barrel.
However, I am very skeptical that the muzzle brakes blackened so uniformly due only to firing.
The Germans did not use black powder, and therefore their ammunition was smokeless.
The combustion gases travel forward at high speed so they do not curl around backward to deposit soot.
In fact, I think the muzzle brakes must have had some kind of discoloration due to the extreme heat generated by the firing.
For those who are interested, I have attached a rather rare photo of a StuG IV from the Viking Panzer division during the summer of 1944 (with zimmerit coating).
 

Attachments

  • Viking.jpg
    Viking.jpg
    65.3 KB · Views: 20
  • mb12-1.jpeg
    mb12-1.jpeg
    46 KB · Views: 19
  • mb10 (1).jpg
    mb10 (1).jpg
    106.8 KB · Views: 17
  • mb9-9.jpg
    mb9-9.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 18
  • mb9-4.jpg
    mb9-4.jpg
    107.3 KB · Views: 19
  • mb9-1.jpg
    mb9-1.jpg
    97.3 KB · Views: 20
However, I am very skeptical that the muzzle brakes blackened so uniformly due only to firing.
The Germans did not use black powder, and therefore their ammunition was smokeless.
The combustion gases travel forward at high speed so they do not curl around backward to deposit soot.
In fact, I think the muzzle brakes must have had some kind of discoloration due to the extreme heat generated by the firing.

I'd submit that two of your assumptions are incorrect:

The Germans did not use black powder, and therefore their ammunition was smokeless.
- the "smokeless" powder used in German ammunition just means it did not produce excessive smoke that lingered and floated on the battlefield. Smokeless powder still produces plenty of black carbon fouling.

The combustion gases travel forward at high speed so they do not curl around backward to deposit soot.
- The muzzle brake directs a good amount of gases to the sides, and even slightly rearward. This re-direction of the vector of the propellant gases is what provides a braking action to the cannon recoil.

There are LOTS of historic pictures that show very darkened muzzle brakes on winter whitewashed Panzer IVs and Stug IIIs. To me, the majority of them look like carbon following, with a pattern that starts around the muzzle brake and when fired enough extends backwards to the cannon barrel behind the face of the cannon. That is my interpretation. It could be heat at the muzzle brake or even the cannon blast chipping/wearing off the whitewash paint. All are plausible explanations to me. I personally think carbon fouling played a role.

You mentioned that the 75mm KwK40 and StuK40 guns were literally finished in solid black and installed on the tanks and SPGs.
I have no information on this and would be interested to know your sources if you're willing.

The solid black factory finished muzzle brakes is documentedin the photographic record. I've posted this picture before of factory Stug IIIs with grey cannon barrels and black muzzle brakes at the assembly firm. Below is also a picture of Stug III pulled from a bog in Russia still in it's original paint that has a solid black muzzle brake and one in with it's crew in front of it. The second and third pictures in my post above are also of Stug IIIs with grey barrels and solid black muzzle brakes.


Screenshot 2025-04-01 at 11.05.47 PM.png

post-2793-0-53724600-1329953822-817180651 copy.jpg

245745732_4962577873753042_4673563858504987235_n.jpg

Interpreting black and white photos is extremely difficult, and you can only really definitively tell if it is a black muzzle brake vs a grey muzzle brake if the vehicle is clean and the lighting is just right. There's enough of these types of pictures that it was definitely a thing. Before my last computer crashed, I used to have a historic picture of a Russian 155mm howitzer that the Germans captured a put back in service that they repainted in solid Dunkelgel with a solid black muzzle brake.

For AFVs, I've only seen definitive pictures of them mounted on KwK 40 and StuK 40 cannons on the Panzer IV and Stug III. Since the Stug IV has the same StuK 40 cannon, a solid black muzzle brake on that assault gun is plausible to me. I do not know how prevalent the solid black muzzle brakes were. Most of the definitive photos I have are from lat 1942 to 1943 production AFVs, so it's possible this could have only been a thing for a few months or that only one or a few of the muzzle brake sub-contractors finished them in black.

Mysteries like this are what keep me fascinated with WW2 German armor. I've also learned to keep a very open mind on German armor, as it seems to always surprise me with these weird little production idiosyncrasies that don't seem realistic. Another example of a realistic feature that seems unrealistic would be the camo pattern that is on the lower hull below the sponsons of the JJD MNH striped Panther. I specifically told John to paint it there, because the Germans painted this area too for the factory painted camo schemes, as odd as it seems. It was confirmed by period photos and Roddy McDougall, the late author of the preeminent tome on Panther factory camo schemes.

Cheers.
 
As for aesthetics issue, I think the black muzzle brake dead horse has been beat to death, and you could probably move on from it. First Legion's more recent models like the Jagdpanzer IVs, Elefant, and Ferdinand have muzzle brakes with a LOT less black weathering. It's almost non-existent on the Ferdinand. So it seems First Legion has not been "systemically blackening" muzzle brakes for a few tank releases now.
 
As for aesthetics issue, I think the black muzzle brake dead horse has been beat to death, and you could probably move on from it. First Legion's more recent models like the Jagdpanzer IVs, Elefant, and Ferdinand have muzzle brakes with a LOT less black weathering. It's almost non-existent on the Ferdinand. So it seems First Legion has not been "systemically blackening" muzzle brakes for a few tank releases now.
And that's a very good thing !.
 
I'd submit that two of your assumptions are incorrect:

The Germans did not use black powder, and therefore their ammunition was smokeless.
- the "smokeless" powder used in German ammunition just means it did not produce excessive smoke that lingered and floated on the battlefield. Smokeless powder still produces plenty of black carbon fouling.

The combustion gases travel forward at high speed so they do not curl around backward to deposit soot.
- The muzzle brake directs a good amount of gases to the sides, and even slightly rearward. This re-direction of the vector of the propellant gases is what provides a braking action to the cannon recoil.

There are LOTS of historic pictures that show very darkened muzzle brakes on winter whitewashed Panzer IVs and Stug IIIs. To me, the majority of them look like carbon following, with a pattern that starts around the muzzle brake and when fired enough extends backwards to the cannon barrel behind the face of the cannon. That is my interpretation. It could be heat at the muzzle brake or even the cannon blast chipping/wearing off the whitewash paint. All are plausible explanations to me. I personally think carbon fouling played a role.



The solid black factory finished muzzle brakes is documentedin the photographic record. I've posted this picture before of factory Stug IIIs with grey cannon barrels and black muzzle brakes at the assembly firm. Below is also a picture of Stug III pulled from a bog in Russia still in it's original paint that has a solid black muzzle brake and one in with it's crew in front of it. The second and third pictures in my post above are also of Stug IIIs with grey barrels and solid black muzzle brakes.


View attachment 358737

View attachment 358739

View attachment 358738

Interpreting black and white photos is extremely difficult, and you can only really definitively tell if it is a black muzzle brake vs a grey muzzle brake if the vehicle is clean and the lighting is just right. There's enough of these types of pictures that it was definitely a thing. Before my last computer crashed, I used to have a historic picture of a Russian 155mm howitzer that the Germans captured a put back in service that they repainted in solid Dunkelgel with a solid black muzzle brake.

For AFVs, I've only seen definitive pictures of them mounted on KwK 40 and StuK 40 cannons on the Panzer IV and Stug III. Since the Stug IV has the same StuK 40 cannon, a solid black muzzle brake on that assault gun is plausible to me. I do not know how prevalent the solid black muzzle brakes were. Most of the definitive photos I have are from lat 1942 to 1943 production AFVs, so it's possible this could have only been a thing for a few months or that only one or a few of the muzzle brake sub-contractors finished them in black.

Mysteries like this are what keep me fascinated with WW2 German armor. I've also learned to keep a very open mind on German armor, as it seems to always surprise me with these weird little production idiosyncrasies that don't seem realistic. Another example of a realistic feature that seems unrealistic would be the camo pattern that is on the lower hull below the sponsons of the JJD MNH striped Panther. I specifically told John to paint it there, because the Germans painted this area too for the factory painted camo schemes, as odd as it seems. It was confirmed by period photos and Roddy McDougall, the late author of the preeminent tome on Panther factory camo schemes.

Cheers.
Thank you for this very thorough and well-documented answer.
It's always very interesting to have discussions with you, even though we each have different opinions on certain topics.
Regarding the blackened muzzle brakes, indeed, as you say, a number of tanks had this characteristic.
But what I find unfortunate and unrealistic is when almost all models are represented this way.
And it's a very good thing if this effect is starting to be significantly reduced on some brands' models.
I have also the book of Roddy McDougall on Panther factory camo scemes and it is really a wonderful book .
Regarding gunpowder and its technical effects, not being myself an expert on the subject, I relied on various discussion forums fron reputable model-making websites
and what was said on the subject seemed relevant to me.
I think that, generally speaking, modelers are more concerned with historical accuracy than collectors, apart from some people like you.
 
I found a better quality photo of the Viking StuG IV in Poland during the summer of 1944.
 

Attachments

  • Viking2.jpg
    Viking2.jpg
    134.5 KB · Views: 9

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top