jazzeum
Four Star General
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2005
- Messages
- 38,428
This was discussed some time ago and rather than continuing the old thread, why not start with what Channel 4 in the UK considered the 100 Greatest
Brad,
Thanks a million for the link; hard to argue with their top ten, they nailed it. The one difference with me is I'd have Schindlers List at #2 after SPR...................
Well count me in with the morons I suppose. I would have picked SiL over SPR as well. Better acting, beautiful cinematography, uplifting story, excellent dialogue. That is nothing against SPR, it is indeed a fine movie and certainly it deserves the substantial credit it received.SPR doesn't deserve to be in the top ten? Sorry, you lost me with that one. The movie won for best director and should have won for best picture, Shakespeare in love was a better movie? Give me a break, the morons in Hollywood are wrong once again.
........
Interesting, I didn't know Douglas said that but it figures. I found it hard to watch but I am glad I did. I am also glad Kubric and Douglas made that sacrifice.Although discussed briefly on another thread, "Paths of Glory" really should be in the top ten.
Couple of obvious reasons why I believe the great unwashed movie-going public never rated this higher.
Much too harrowing to watch in it's entirety but if you do view it I can think of no other war movie that leaves you so enraged at the absence of retribution.
But it remains, without a shadow of a doubt, one of the best ever made.
And as Douglas said to Kubrick "Stanley! it wont make a single buck-but we gotta make it-and those who do pay to see it will still remember it 50 years later.
He was right on all counts
Reb
I certainly was not insulted, just took up your choice of words."Well count me in with the morons I suppose. I would have picked SiL over SPR as well."
In no way did I intend to insult you or anyone else who thinks SIL is a better movie than SPR...........Speilberg essentially said he made the movie as a tribute to the men and women who served their countries during WWII and my father, his brother and my mothers four brothers all served in the US military; army, navy and marines.
I guess it bothers me that the movie did not win best picture, I view it correctly or incorrectly as an insult to those who served, maybe I'm way out in left field on this. It would have been fitting to give it best picture as a way to honor those for whom the movie was a tribute to; how many times in the history of the academy awards did best director not get best picture? If he was best director, should his movie not be the best movie.
That's how I see it.
I guess it bothers me that the movie did not win best picture, I view it correctly or incorrectly as an insult to those who served, maybe I'm way out in left field on this. It would have been fitting to give it best picture as a way to honor those for whom the movie was a tribute to; how many times in the history of the academy awards did best director not get best picture? If he was best director, should his movie not be the best movie.
That's how I see it.
"Well count me in with the morons I suppose. I would have picked SiL over SPR as well."
In no way did I intend to insult you or anyone else who thinks SIL is a better movie than SPR...........Speilberg essentially said he made the movie as a tribute to the men and women who served their countries during WWII and my father, his brother and my mothers four brothers all served in the US military; army, navy and marines.
I guess it bothers me that the movie did not win best picture, I view it correctly or incorrectly as an insult to those who served, maybe I'm way out in left field on this. It would have been fitting to give it best picture as a way to honor those for whom the movie was a tribute to; how many times in the history of the academy awards did best director not get best picture? If he was best director, should his movie not be the best movie.
That's how I see it.
I agree with you 100 % George. When SiL won over SPR I was shocked. I don't think I've taken the Oscars seriously since then. Whoe evn remebers SIL?? SPR will always be remembered. No movie ever affected me like that.
It sure increased my admiration for my Dad who was just an 18 year old kid when he was in WW2.
This was discussed some time ago and rather than continuing the old thread, why not start with what Channel 4 in the UK considered the 100 Greatest
True enough, I bet you would get a different list with every group you polled actually. I guess opinions are indeed one of the two things that every one has; each being useful in its own way and one being more so if you don't take it too seriously.I think what is interesting here is the diverse differences of opinions.
...
Be that as it may, I have to agree that Paths of Glory was indeed a fine movie.
I agree with you 100 % George. When SiL won over SPR I was shocked. I don't think I've taken the Oscars seriously since then. Whoe evn remebers SIL??....
Exactly the same approach applied by those who do like SiL There are quite a number of common hard working folk in that category. I do agree that whether something wins with the Academy is based on a lot more than merit. They do occassionally get it right though.... I apply the same kind of approach to movies as I do to collecting figures-I watch what I like, and I don't care what the blowdried set think, they have too much time on their hands, anyway. ...Prost!
Brad