For comparison, the Corgi 1/72 with real panel lines:
Done properly, the effect looks similar enough.
I have this model as well. As Moe stated, the panel lines are actually carved/indentations and blend well. The TGM model lines are painted with a different color and appear too noticeable, at least in the pictures. Suggest using more muted colors if painting. BTW, I never noticed pronounced panel lines like those on TGM models on any aircraft I flew, nor do I notice them now on civilian aircraft. Chris
On the lines, Chris, me neither. However, modelers and, to a degree, collectors appear to love embellished treatments of those same surfaces. Here's what a modeler did to an Airfix 1/72 kit:
Would I be wrong to suggest that "master modelers" are known for this sort of thing? Personally, I'm fairly indifferent to highlighting and staining like that, but modelers certainly get praised for it. To my mind, it creates an interesting effect, but, to my eye, it's not necessarily "realistic," but an effect for effects sake.
-Moe
On the lines, Chris, me neither. However, modelers and, to a degree, collectors appear to love embellished treatments of those same surfaces. Here's what a modeler did to an Airfix 1/72 kit:
Would I be wrong to suggest that "master modelers" are known for this sort of thing? Personally, I'm fairly indifferent to highlighting and staining like that, but modelers certainly get praised for it. To my mind, it creates an interesting effect, but, to my eye, it's not necessarily "realistic," but an effect for effects sake.
-Moe
Moe, notice on the bottom example you provided, the panel lines on the upper wing surfaces are blended in and not painted a "harsh" and distinctive white color as was done on the TGM example. THis model looks more natural and realistic IMO. Even the white panel lines look muted and blend better. I am a fan of TGM wooden models, I have 10, but of the WWI variety with canvas as opposed to the metal skin. Chris