Armored Cars (4 Viewers)

fmethorst

Command Sergeant Major
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
2,478
The last two armored cars released by K&C seem like odd choices to me. Keeping in mind that an item must be marketable to be created (i.e. Tiger, Sherman etc.) I don't understand these two selections. Do these really sell as well Sd.Kfz.222, 231, 232, 234 would?

FOB043(L).jpg


WS125(L).jpg


I admit I like the looks of the Panhard. I just feel it would have been more versatile had it been a more common version. The number of cars mentioned in the excerpts below are not large and decreased as the war progressed.

Original Designation: AMD Panhard 174/178
Original Role: armored car
German Designation: Panzerspahwagen P174/178 204(f)
Conversions/Role/Use: combat/reconnaissance/policing/training
Note: Some were modified and rearmed with 50mm KwK L/42 guns. Some were converted to railway protection armored cars.

A couple excerpts from Wikipedia:

As the type was well-suited to German tactics, at least 190 Panhards, most of them brandnew, were issued to German reconnaissance units for use in Operation Barbarossa in 1941 under the designation of Panzerspähwagen P204 (f), 107 would be lost that year. Among these were some radio vehicles, designated Panzerspähwagen (Funk) P204 (f). Thirty Panhards were listed as in use on the Eastern Front on 31 May 1943. Some of these were fitted with spaced armour.

Modifications by Germany, Vichy France and Italy

After 1941 the Germans modified 43 cars as railway-protection vehicles (Schienenpanzer); they could drive on the tracks themselves by means of special wheels and were fitted with large radio frame aerials.

Under the armistice conditions the Vichy regime was allowed to use 64 Panhards for police service. These vehicles, mainly taken from the May-June production batches,[27] had their guns removed and replaced with an additional machine gun. On orders of the Army, Engineer J. Restany from April 1941 clandestinely produced 45 new turrets, fitted with a 47 mm SA 35 gun; some were eventually combined with the hulls. These hulls and cars were hidden or dumped in lakes when the whole of France was occupied in 1942. In the summer of 1944 some were taken into use by the resistance; of these vehicles some would again be captured and used by the Germans.

In 1944 some of the 34 Panhards captured by the Germans when they overran Vichy-France in November 1942, were rebuilt with the 50 mm L/42 or L/60 gun in an open-topped turret and used for occupation duty. In November 1942, the Italian Army also captured two Panhards, which would be used by them until September 1943.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-639-4252-20A%2C_Im_Osten%2C_Schienen-Sp%C3%A4hpanzer_Panhard_P178.jpg


panhardrb_6.jpg


bwpanh-1.jpg
 
You have to remember that Andy choses not only by marketability but by what appeals to him. From some of the choices it seems that Andy enjoys throwing in something "fun" rather than just chasing the market. probably the artist in him that enjoys varying the mix a bit.

Gary
 
Fmethorst, the best thing about owning your own toy soldier company is you can make what you want.
However, that being said I agree with you wholeheartedly. I can't believe that the last two armored cars would sell better than the 231, 232 or an actual PUMA w/ the 50mm gun.

Fmethorst, I look at King & Country as an artist, if you wait they come through with brilliance like the Hetzer, Elephant and the Flakpanzer 38(t).
 
I agree. I don't understand why KC makes obscure or reconverted captured vehicles, such as the Panhard & T-34, when Germany made a wide variety of neat looking armour. That being said, I bought the Polizei ADGZ armoured car (Frank's first picture), based on a thread by Combat and I love it. I grew to like armoured cars and regret not buying the Puma. I'll probably end up buying the Panhard. On a another note, my favorite tank is the Panzer III. Beautiful design. KC should make a new and improved one. Also I saw a picture of a Flakvierling 38 SdKfz 7/1 anti-aircraft halftrack, which sides fold down when in action. That would be a great vehicle that KC should produce. Sorry no picture.
 
The whole thing with collecting WW2 Vehicles is that you want a wide range of models representing the vehicles involved.I like to see all types of afv's used by all sides.Don't get me wrong i love the Tigers,Panthers and Shermans and have several of each,but it would be pretty boring if thats all we got.Part of the appeal of K&C is seeing what they produce next,variety is the spice of life after all.Also i'm sure over the coming years we will see more of the more famous beasts.

Rob
 
I believe he makes the Tigers and the Shermans for the mass market and the profit.

He makes the others for the real toysoldier collector to keep this guy/girl interested in the KC range.

Ofcourse Andy must do it as well for his own personal fun.

Keep them coming Andy

JPB
 
i'm 100% with Frank (Fmethorst) on this one. the germans aren't lacking in variations on their own vehicles and armours, so why not make them?
i can understand it if K&C has exhausted all German variations.

furthermore as it looks like there will only be a german vehicle every K&C dispatch, to have a captured vehicle (which just like the previous Polizei ADGZ, has limited service and definitely less versatile in displays) instead of the german ones, is for me, quite frustrating.

i would have preferred K&C to make some less known german vehicles like the Flakpanzer IV (2cm Vierling) Wirbelwind or Flakpanzer IV (3.7cm FlaK) Ostwind.

my 2 cents.
 

Attachments

  • wirbel.jpg
    wirbel.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 1,659
  • ostwind.jpg
    ostwind.jpg
    22.3 KB · Views: 2,330
I'd also like to see more German Armoured cars for the later part of the War.
Normandy, Arnhem, Germany.
I'm hoping for the following in the future.

The Sdkfz in the following modes.
251/9 with 75m Gun.
250/7 with 80mm Motar.
250/8 with 75mm Gun.
A Puma would be a must. Even a re-release of the Sdkfz 234/3 with 75mm Gun. Also a Sdkfz 222.
In my opinion, one can never have enough vehicles or figures. I'd too, also like to see some flakpanzers. Also a Sdkzf 6 with 50mm Flak Gun.
I even came across some pictures of the Panhard on the Eastern Front.
Interesting vehicle to say the least. But all sides do need some added reinforcements, and I'll take it.
 
I don't know if this really helps but I've heard Andy say on a couple of occasions "Andy makes what Andy likes!" Now, I know he also makes things if he gets enough requests for it and it's something he wants to make. It's a probably a combination of the two factors.
 
Well, if that's the motto, then fair play.

i think we, as K&C collectors, are just highlighting what we thought.

i would like to think K&C would have the class and address what its collectors thought.
 
I agree that Andy can choose to make whatever likes; however, this does run counter to the statement that K&C only makes what sells. In other words the Eastern Front, Italian theatre, Pacific theatre, Axis Partners etc. don't sell so they can't be viably produced.

Based on these armored cars I think a more accurate statement would be that K&C has certain "bread and butter" ranges and pieces (Normandy, North Africa, Bulge, Tiger Sherman etc.) that help keep it healthy and this gives its artists sufficient creative license to also produce some more obscure items. Essentially this means that yes, Eastern Front items could be produced if there was a will to do so but there isn't. It's alright to say there isn't a lot of interest in some of these other ranges/items in the K&C creative department. I just have a tough time accepting that K&C is solely influenced by what sells.

The bottom line for me is that as long as figures/items actually existed (true for both of these cars) and some effort has been made to put them into a historically correct context then I'm good.

I'm going to pass on both of these armored cars and see what the future brings.
 
For fun, how about a Rolls Royce or Lancaster, from WW1?.....

Andy bought a WWI Rolls Royce Armored Car in desert markings from Metalshed (a single artist company that makes really cool welded metal vehicles and aircraft) so he definitely has an interest in the period.
 
Well, if that's the motto, then fair play.

i think we, as K&C collectors, are just highlighting what we thought.

i would like to think K&C would have the class and address what its collectors thought.

Along with what "Andy likes/makes" statement Andy also reserves the right to change his mind. "Never surrender,never give up!":)
 
Well, if that's the motto, then fair play.

i think we, as K&C collectors, are just highlighting what we thought.

i would like to think K&C would have the class and address what its collectors thought.

He does; he takes into account what collectors want, what he likes to make (since he is a World War II buff) and what sells. By and large, I believe collectors are satisfied with what he makes as there is a lot to choose from.
 
Yeah, the wait for the Sdkfz-231/2 (6 wheel) continues - more common, more iconic, cooler looking, authentically German, a real Blitzkrieg vehicle - but apparently Andy just doesn't like it. :(
 

Attachments

  • sdkfz231.jpg
    sdkfz231.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 186
Hi Guys,

Interesting thread this one… what it seems to come down to is this… Some collectors get a “wee bit miffed” (Scottish for disappointed) if they don’t get what they particularly wanted or liked at any one time.

K&C (and yours truly) will also get criticized for choosing something that some may consider “too obscure” or rare… in their opinion.

Simultaneously, when K&C does release let’s say an upgraded or new version of something else we’ve done previously we’ll then be criticized for “not thinking outside the box”.

So, my friends, I’ve discovered how to deal with this… I produce something I like and hope most other K&C collectors will do.

And I don’t do this just to upset some folks… Myself, brother Gordon and our creative team are constantly going through books, magazines, museums, websites, movies, documentaries and a whole lot more studying, looking and considering what we will do next. It’s rarely, if ever, just a little creative whim taken on the spur of the moment. It costs money and it takes time to develop new ideas. Most of the time this is money and effort well-spent and it pays off for us… and I like to think the vast majority of our collectors all over the world… not just in North America.

But I’ve learned in this great, diverse and sometimes contentious little hobby of ours that you’ll never please everybody… So, don’t waste your energy trying to be all things to all people… all the time

That’s a sure-fire recipe for an extended stay in the “looney-bin” and an excellent way to bankruptcy!

By all means listen to what people say and read what they write (or post) but at the end of the day trust your own “gut instinct” and always look at the “big picture”… not just a small corner of it.

As I’ve written (and said) many times before I believe K&C gets it more right… more often… than most of our competitors.

If we do get it wrong occasionally well… nobody’s perfect!

Best New Year Wishes and Happy Collecting in 2009!
Andy C.


P.S. I love Polar Bear’s photo essay using our Hong Kong figures and new US Navy guys… lots of fun and imagination.

One small historical point—Hong Kong, prior to 1997, was a British Crown colony with a British garrison… no US Troops or ships were stationed here, they certainly did visit often but only for R “n” R. They were never used for internal security that’s what the British Garrison and Hong Kong Police did.

Now US sailors and marines DID have garrisons elsewhere in China… particularly Shanghai but that, as they say, is another story.

Anyway, well done “Polar”… I always enjoy seeing your work!
 
i guess it comes with the territory with K&C being such a dominant player in this hobby.

all the manufacturers at one point or another will be inquired by its customers, and i would like to think that all involved are mature enough to discuss whatever the issues.

i would like to think our customer feedback were all in good intentions, seeing that we are genuine customers, and to my naked eye, some ideas (like the eastern front perhaps) have quite a number of supporters to maybe make it worthwhile to have a look.

now some of us have done our part and relayed our thoughts, its up to Andy to weigh them up.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if this really helps but I've heard Andy say on a couple of occasions "Andy makes what Andy likes!" Now, I know he also makes things if he gets enough requests for it and it's something he wants to make. It's a probably a combination of the two factors.

Also K/C should be VERY aware from this thread that....."buyers buy what buyers want".......this latest armoured vehicle does nothing to spark my interest (and from the tone of most posts on this thread I am not alone)......captured german vehicles do little to capture my "hard earned" dollars especially when there are so many other options for German armour that could be made as others have suggested.....IMO
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top