Arnhem P figures. Will you get them? (1 Viewer)

Will You Be Buying The P Figures at Current Prices


  • Total voters
    63
I find it interesting that you find it interesting{sm4}

My confusion with the loyalty issue is not that I question the existence of the emotional attachment to these issues. It is whether such an attachment - which surely is no different to that which exists between any buyer and seller - can demand of a manufacturer that he or she price a product based on something as tenuous as the notion of 'loyalty' based on a financial relationship. A Brit or Australian soldier in the Middle East is not going to be braver tomorrow if he or she has a 20 percent pay rise. Patriotism, like any form of loyalty, is an emotional attachment.

A good deal of the discussion about pricing blurs the lines between finances and loyalty, making for a somewhat confused mix of wages in China on one side, painting time in the middle and loyalty to past customers on the other. It is quite a mix. I do feel - and I am conscious here that I do not feel particularly passionate about the discussion so I have no wish to offend those who do - that when I say something is too dear, that is an assessment that has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of manufacturing that product, but in fact has everything to do with my financial situation. In a perfect world I would buy every WW 1 aircrat from K & C and JJ but I choose not to. That has nothing to do with the products being good value or being over or under priced. It has, howover, a lot to do with the amount of my excess cash and where I choose to spend it.

As for whether people want it to fail, I cannot really say. I move in a rather small TS group (very small compared to some I suspect) and only one is collecting Arnhem at the moment so my view is pure speculation (particularly as I have not spoken to him yet about the new range - Wayne are you buying?). If I had to make a guess - and a guess will all it will be - if I had a gun to my head and had to express an opinion, I would so no, they do not want it to fail. Some, many, most, all - who am I to know - are probably a bit frustrated that the range will look magnificent and will probably sell. That is pure speculation so it may well be wrong. I have been wrong before - once or twice!{sm4}{sm4}
To answer your question....most likely yes. As you know Great War figures will always be my first buy then what ever I like next..so if I like the new Arnhem figures when I see them in my hand as opposed to going by a picture...yes. The price is as always something we would of course like to be cheaper but if you can't afford it don't buy it. And honestly all the rest is just waffle IMO.
Wayne.
 
I find it interesting that you find it interesting{sm4}

My confusion with the loyalty issue is not that I question the existence of the emotional attachment to these issues. It is whether such an attachment - which surely is no different to that which exists between any buyer and seller - can demand of a manufacturer that he or she price a product based on something as tenuous as the notion of 'loyalty' based on a financial relationship. A Brit or Australian soldier in the Middle East is not going to be braver tomorrow if he or she has a 20 percent pay rise. Patriotism, like any form of loyalty, is an emotional attachment.

A good deal of the discussion about pricing blurs the lines between finances and loyalty, making for a somewhat confused mix of wages in China on one side, painting time in the middle and loyalty to past customers on the other. It is quite a mix. I do feel - and I am conscious here that I do not feel particularly passionate about the discussion so I have no wish to offend those who do - that when I say something is too dear, that is an assessment that has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of manufacturing that product, but in fact has everything to do with my financial situation. In a perfect world I would buy every WW 1 aircrat from K & C and JJ but I choose not to. That has nothing to do with the products being good value or being over or under priced. It has, howover, a lot to do with the amount of my excess cash and where I choose to spend it.

As for whether people want it to fail, I cannot really say. I move in a rather small TS group (very small compared to some I suspect) and only one is collecting Arnhem at the moment so my view is pure speculation (particularly as I have not spoken to him yet about the new range - Wayne are you buying?). If I had to make a guess - and a guess will all it will be - if I had a gun to my head and had to express an opinion, I would so no, they do not want it to fail. Some, many, most, all - who am I to know - are probably a bit frustrated that the range will look magnificent and will probably sell. That is pure speculation so it may well be wrong. I have been wrong before - once or twice!{sm4}{sm4}

If im not a Nigel and part of your group Marty then there would be two people that you know that collects Arnhem! {sm4} As i stated on another thread, i will be buying the new figures as they look good in the pic's and despite the high prices, i understand the reasons behind the price increase.

Tom
 
the poll results will be skewed due to:

in uk, the price is at 55 pounds instead of 55 usd; which is about 83 usd according to the current conversion rate

thus we should be asking.....

will collectors around the world pay 83 usd for a new MG(P)? or

will UK buyers hypothetically pay 55 usd (or 36 pounds) for a MG(P) just like the rest of the world?
 
If im not a Nigel and part of your group Marty then there would be two people that you know that collects Arnhem! {sm4} As i stated on another thread, i will be buying the new figures as they look good in the pic's and despite the high prices, i understand the reasons behind the price increase.

Tom

Tom

Two points:

1. Yes, you are part of the group. I was not aware that you collected Arnhem. So in my circle 100 percent of collectors will buy!

2. What is the point of me using a false name on the Forum if my friends keep using my real one?

Regards

Jack
 
the poll results will be skewed due to:

in uk, the price is at 55 pounds instead of 55 usd; which is about 83 usd according to the current conversion rate

thus we should be asking.....

will collectors around the world pay 83 usd for a new MG(P)? or

will UK buyers hypothetically pay 55 usd (or 36 pounds) for a MG(P) just like the rest of the world?

Best post yet!
 
Tom

Two points:

1. Yes, you are part of the group. I was not aware that you collected Arnhem. So in my circle 100 percent of collectors will buy!

2. What is the point of me using a false name on the Forum if my friends keep using my real one?

Regards

Jack

Sorry 007, i'll revert to your alias name!!!{sm4}

Tom
 
Interesting comments gentlemen.
I'm lucky that I have 79 Paras,3 jeeps and 2 six pounders.
I've already preordered the new P releases,price is higher than what I thought it was going to be,but they do look good.
Next releases look even better,could even be a jeep amongst them.
I don't get free freight to New Zealand, so it costs me more to get them here.
It will be interesting to see what other P series K and C release.
 
Tom

Two points:

1. Yes, you are part of the group. I was not aware that you collected Arnhem. So in my circle 100 percent of collectors will buy!

2. What is the point of me using a false name on the Forum if my friends keep using my real one?

Regards

Jack

and here was me thinking your name was Nigel.....^&confuse^&grin:tongue:
 
Interesting comments gentlemen.
I'm lucky that I have 79 Paras,3 jeeps and 2 six pounders.
I've already preordered the new P releases,price is higher than what I thought it was going to be,but they do look good.
Next releases look even better,could even be a jeep amongst them.
I don't get free freight to New Zealand, so it costs me more to get them here.
It will be interesting to see what other P series K and C release.

You're telling me mate......the freight down here is a killer{eek3}
 
A good idea for a Poll but probably needed better questions to avoid the sitiuation where obvious non K&C/WW2 collectors are voting.

Dont get me wrong they are entitled to vote based on how the question was phrased but it is not very informative to get a no vote from somebody we know would have no interest in the subject or brand whatever the price.
 
The 2nd poll Arnhem44mad just posted for only Arnhem collectors is just going to muddy things. The first poll should have started "For Collectors of the Arnhem Series ..." But it didn't, so it will capture some "NOs" that wouldn't collect Arnhem anyway, but some of those "NO" voters are voting against any (P) figure in the future. What I think is significant is the large percentage who said they will buy and the undecided. Remember, it's not a vote where the majority wins. Even if the NO side "wins" by a wide margin there still could be a substantial number of (P) buyers.

Terry
 
The 2nd poll Arnhem44mad just posted for only Arnhem collectors is just going to muddy things. The first poll should have started "For Collectors of the Arnhem Series ..." But it didn't, so it will capture some "NOs" that wouldn't collect Arnhem anyway, but some of those "NO" voters are voting against any (P) figure in the future. What I think is significant is the large percentage who said they will buy and the undecided. Remember, it's not a vote where the majority wins. Even if the NO side "wins" by a wide margin there still could be a substantial number of (P) buyers.

Terry

Stop moaning, it's not a discussion about the polls it's a discussion about the figures, prices and quality. People can make their own mind up about the polls. The 2nd poll will give a clearer overview of the forum members' feelings aboiut the new MG figures.

Scott
 
I think the second newer poll will be more reliable as it's more precise. However, let's not forget this Forum is not the universe of buyers. If more of the P are released beyond the figures announced at the West Coaster or as set forth in the Dispatches, then we will know that collectors have purchased them in sufficient amounts to justify further releases. If not, then we may not see them again. Sales dictate future releases.
 
I have cleaned this thread also. This is the second one that has gone way off topic!! Lets keep it on track guys.
 
Interesting discussion - please excuse me for being late. My tertiary research studies in labour market theory and, for a completely different reason, my current employment, bring me into the arena of conflict over pricing; it will always amaze me how many times the worker gets left out of the equation. China has a tremendously dynamic economy while the rest of the world languishes in ... political discussions and stalemate. The trap is to forget this growth is occurring and treat the production source as the same as home. We all know from past experience that growth means rising prices - most countries have been through this. It's just easy to overlook that this growth can be happening where the TS are produced, and that workers in a country recently afflicted by 'free' market regulation can not continue to work for a bowl of rice, particularly when the price of food is rising. As for increasing value of collectibles? Well I see a new range of cuirassiers at $109 that will enhance the real value of those I bought at $79, and, against the odds, I see a range of 'out-of-the-ordinary' tanks at $155 on limited edition. Check out your MG Inventory and revalue it at the new scale and then see how you stand. This is one of the best forms of superannuation going, and, as a bonus, it is a great hobby. I have painted figurines for too many years (picking up my new glasses this morning :) ) and would not contemplate working at this for the price that those painters receive; I don't believe any on this forum would either. The dynamism of China's economy is not within our control, but please spare a thought for the workers without whom the product would not exist. Do take a 'glass-half-full' approach; the problem will cease to exist. Like all good economists, consider continuing your level of investment rather than the number of items that investment buys. As the discussion shows, we are all in positions of relativity because of relative differences in the value of currency from country to country - just apply the same principle to market forces within China and peace will reign.
 
Interesting discussion - please excuse me for being late. My tertiary research studies in labour market theory and, for a completely different reason, my current employment, bring me into the arena of conflict over pricing; it will always amaze me how many times the worker gets left out of the equation. China has a tremendously dynamic economy while the rest of the world languishes in ... political discussions and stalemate. The trap is to forget this growth is occurring and treat the production source as the same as home. We all know from past experience that growth means rising prices - most countries have been through this. It's just easy to overlook that this growth can be happening where the TS are produced, and that workers in a country recently afflicted by 'free' market regulation can not continue to work for a bowl of rice, particularly when the price of food is rising. As for increasing value of collectibles? Well I see a new range of cuirassiers at $109 that will enhance the real value of those I bought at $79, and, against the odds, I see a range of 'out-of-the-ordinary' tanks at $155 on limited edition. Check out your MG Inventory and revalue it at the new scale and then see how you stand. This is one of the best forms of superannuation going, and, as a bonus, it is a great hobby. I have painted figurines for too many years (picking up my new glasses this morning :) ) and would not contemplate working at this for the price that those painters receive; I don't believe any on this forum would either. The dynamism of China's economy is not within our control, but please spare a thought for the workers without whom the product would not exist. Do take a 'glass-half-full' approach; the problem will cease to exist. Like all good economists, consider continuing your level of investment rather than the number of items that investment buys. As the discussion shows, we are all in positions of relativity because of relative differences in the value of currency from country to country - just apply the same principle to market forces within China and peace will reign.

The Chinese are nowhere near the biggest collectors in this hobby. If economic growth exists there, how is that going to help price appreciation for these collectibles? The price stress for collectibles in this hobby is beginning to show-up on eBay. It is my belief that we may be in the early stages of toy soldier price deflation at least from the perspective of prior releases of product into the marketplace over the last 12 years or so. It all comes down to basic economic theory of supply and demand and whether people believe they are gettting good value for the price paid compared to what else they can use their discretionary income for. For sure, this hobby will see some interesting times to come but I am not betting on getting more money for when I eventually sell items to where prices are today... It could be a lot lower... eek3}
 
Interesting discussion - please excuse me for being late. My tertiary research studies in labour market theory and, for a completely different reason, my current employment, bring me into the arena of conflict over pricing; it will always amaze me how many times the worker gets left out of the equation. China has a tremendously dynamic economy while the rest of the world languishes in ... political discussions and stalemate. The trap is to forget this growth is occurring and treat the production source as the same as home. We all know from past experience that growth means rising prices - most countries have been through this. It's just easy to overlook that this growth can be happening where the TS are produced, and that workers in a country recently afflicted by 'free' market regulation can not continue to work for a bowl of rice, particularly when the price of food is rising. As for increasing value of collectibles? Well I see a new range of cuirassiers at $109 that will enhance the real value of those I bought at $79, and, against the odds, I see a range of 'out-of-the-ordinary' tanks at $155 on limited edition. Check out your MG Inventory and revalue it at the new scale and then see how you stand. This is one of the best forms of superannuation going, and, as a bonus, it is a great hobby. I have painted figurines for too many years (picking up my new glasses this morning :) ) and would not contemplate working at this for the price that those painters receive; I don't believe any on this forum would either. The dynamism of China's economy is not within our control, but please spare a thought for the workers without whom the product would not exist. Do take a 'glass-half-full' approach; the problem will cease to exist. Like all good economists, consider continuing your level of investment rather than the number of items that investment buys. As the discussion shows, we are all in positions of relativity because of relative differences in the value of currency from country to country - just apply the same principle to market forces within China and peace will reign.

As an economist, you must know the significance of a few trends we can clearly see. What happens in a market where supply exceeds demand for several years; where retail prices are rapidly rising due to production costs including wages but where the resale market of items made in the past 3 or 4 years is well below it's original price or retail prices today. I think that investing in the growth of toy soldier values in the short to medium term is akin to investing in the Greek or Cyprus economies. I studied economics at York University in Toronto under Andreas Papandreou, a former Prime Minister of Greece and father of Georges Papandreou, the very recent Prime Minister of Greece. It was a time of fashionable left-wing programs and let population growth and economic growth pay for those programs in the future. I recall numerous debates about the unsustainability of the Greek economy under these programs. The Papandreous went back to Greece, got elected and were able to put those programs into place. But the future didn't bail them out - did it. And the future won't bail out the toy soldier industry either.

Terry
 
I might, the new price is a factor in rather I will or not but it is far from the biggest factor. There are just so many other items I want from K&C as well as other makers that might keep me from buying them. I see of couple of figures in the new releases from MG that I want, and I am leaning towards getting them. I really do not care about future value when buying, if I ever do sell as long as I get at least 80% of what I paid I would consider that breaking even.

This should have stirred up a hornets nest, that is for sure. {sm4}
 
A lot of interesting discussions. Also, some frog in the well perspective. I will throw in some thoughts and I think I will get most Australians agreeing. Some can continue to be doubting Thomases. ( that was the sermon reading yesterday ). Please forgive if i get lost in the way but read what you like and please ignore if it is gibberish to you.

The Australians are closest to this part of the world and they can understand well what is happening. That is why I see more of them putting up a different perspective. That is why they understood very well the Chinese labor market and Australia's dependence on the Chinese consumption for raw materials. The Australians and us Overseas Chinese in Asia are getting the first few waves of rich overseas Chinese spending here. If I walk into a Dunhill or Armani shop today, it is likely that the salesman are serving the rich PRC Chinese.

Cost
The cost today and in the future will continue to be a challenge if and as production continues in China, especially for the very skilled. I have been visiting China since 1993 and since 2000, there is a huge influx of foreign companies manufacturing there. Any CEO will shut down in US and move functions over to China as it is the in thing to keep his job. The challenge is that the skilled labor pool cannot keep up. So, I will not be surprised if a good painter decides to do something else if it pays more. Money talks here, if you understand that "religion" is non existent for many years. Please do not be naive, they will switch jobs or make career switches. Why would any painter care less whether you get one more well painted figure. If however, you are talking about very unskilled labor, this will continue to exist as there are still inland cities.

This is not just a toy soldier issue. However, the recent economic downturn barely helps ease skilled labor cost in China. In fact, it seem to only impacts labor outside of China. Those in the US will know too well.

Valuation of toy soldiers
I believe it will go up for those in the recent years since you cannot buy retired ones at the same price. Try making MG003 again and price it at the same resale point. Will there be a profit? Economics suggest that the price that you see on say a MG030 is from remaining inventory, unlikely from a fresh build.

Again, in the secondary market, it is relative to what number of sets is available for sale and the demand at that point. Also, some people are listing them as not available for Ww shipping, or will ship in UK or US only. What are you then expecting? When you restrict your demand pool, the net you cast is limited.

The nice thing is the production rates are not as high as say Marvel, DC, Star Wars, Hot Toys. Those are just fads.

Shipping cost is actually your biggest enemy in the secondary market. eBay also takes a cut of the shipping. Remember that in the end, in the secondary market, the price of the item is what the buyer finally paid for plus shipping to his home country, not what the bid ended at. At some point, your buyer cannot commensurate between the item value and the shipping cost. There is a breaking point.

But for the very old early stuff such as AN that are priced at Dimestore levels already, it will only be chased by the purist. Why? These have reached a plateau. If some new guys come in for the hobby due to the recent nice sculpts and color, he will find the older stuff cannot match at all or fit to his collection. One or two lucky ones will get their items sold to a new rich millionaire's son. To some of them, these prices are no big deal. But, it is a case of right time, right place.

Currency and Exchange Rate
The RMB is pegged. If not, it can be worse than this. The HKD is already weaker than RMB. The USD, Pound have taken a beating past years. The Euro is still relatively high. The AUD and SGD are all riding on overseas funds coming over making them relatively strong. In fact, the AUD is bloody high. So, past years have benefited collectors in some countries and detrimental to some others.

That said, I still cannot understand why the real price differences in UK and Europe versus the rest of the world. Very puzzling. Plus Vat, it is crazy.

Knowledge of history or of movies
I believe this is another important part to the hobby catching on amongst new collectors especially in the rich of China. Let us not forget that most have a good knowledge of their internal history but not of the outside world and even a campaign like OMG (oh my gosh.. Lol). The cultural revolution did happen and there is an impact. Also, most have parents with a trader background. Thus buying the Gucci, Rolexes, Bimmer, Merc are more important for them now. These can be easily reflected to their peers. Toy soldiers cannot be shown off but one day when it can, it will take off.

The lines that will catch on first will be stuff like Streets of HK, Imperial China. They know these. But, they do not necessarily buy these in US or UK. If you go to Gettysburg, you get started and pick up Civil War toys, not SOH or IC...

Pricing
I cite two examples since I am familiar with them.

Why is it that in Hifi, some are priced $10k, some $5k and some $200? Is there a increase in value in terms of sound proportionate to the price? Answer is no. But someone will buy it if it is exclusive enough and he has the money. That pool of buyers of course is narrow.

In guitars, does a Brazilian rosewood which cost $50k sounds 50 times better than one of lesser woods and less intricate inlays? Same thing, some collector will pick this because there are less than ten made.

There is always a price point for each segment of customers and if enough exist to make sense, a biz and product will exist to service it. The production numbers will just be less for premium products and at some point you and me have to say that is not mine, e.g. The Warbirds, the $50k Martin Brazilian Rosewood guitar signed by Eric Clapton, that $20k Reference Turntable.

Finally

So, we are all asking for OMG. And it was no for many years. And then now it gets crowned with "P" products, P perhaps standing for pent up demand perhaps. We will see how it goes.

As to whether these "P" gets snowball all over other ranges, I of course like you hope not. But, what I already have, I do have enough in my collection to enjoy substantially already.

i also know that if everything moves on to "P", something else will come by to take its place. So, I wouldn't worry too much. There are stakes on both sides. When there is a market gap for something in the $30 to $40 range, something will come and fill it. Or K&C will plug up the gap. Such is life. I learn my marketing knowledge from the Americans and Europeans. I am just regurgitating back to you.... Have a great week ahead!

Chris
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top