PJDeluhery
Corporal
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 586
Yo Troopers, great thread this, and just some superb stunning painting, but if its taking up to 8 weeks to paint a model, you can see where the price comes in. Now Chas Stadden must be classed as the first Connoissers figures to be made IMHO. So I emailed some months back Thor & Nikki Johnson from Aeroart, and asked the question how do they think their models compare against Chas Stadden models of the 1970s-1980s Had a nice reply from Nikki, that with modern day techniques, that they had surpassed the Stadden models on Painting & face presentation. Now you cannot argue with the painting on their Knights and Ancient models, well they use Master painters, and they are stunning. But what I would argue is their sculpting is no better than the Chas Models especially on the horses, would like (spitfrnd) thoughts on this he is the real life horse expert. Also looking at the Russian sites you guys put up, still dont think their face presentation is as good as Chas Stadden. Nikki says theirs looks more lifelike, but I cannot see this. Nikki did go on to say that if they were looking to collect 19th & 20th Century Military models that they would go for Chas Stadden every time. So there is another one for you guys to kick around. Lets here your thoughts on this point guys.
Bernard.
MOUNT UP.
I'm a long-time collector of ST Petersburg figures (they may well be my retirement plan at this point!!
As for 19-20th C figures, I have not paid attention to these St Pete figures very much, and my refernce for (factory?) painted Staddens is from memory, but I think the painting, poses and detail on the St Pete are still better than Staddens. I also think the 19-20th C figures are on the low end of the St Pete range in terms of sculpture and painting. They simply do not present the "Wow!" factor possibilities of, say, a medieval mounted knight. So in some ways this is a comparison of Stadden's high end product to St Pete's low end product. Comparable? I dunno.
Of course this is all personal opinion and I'm not sure what value these "who's better" discussions really have. (The toy soldier equivalent of rooting for one's own sports team ? - another thing that elludes me, I confess!) To me, Stadden is a highly stylized product, ie. created their own style and niche, and that's great. They have a very loyal following. I have not been very attracted to the period or Stadden way of dong things. This is not to say Stadden is inferior in any way, just not to my historical or aesthetic taste. OTOH, St Pete never fails to blow me away, regardless of the subject.
No offense meant to anyone here.