Phantom Warrior
Major
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 6,881
Unfortunately the "interpretation of size" issue has been with 54mm for a long time, and it seems to carry over to 1/30th. It is usually translated as 1/32nd scale, but many 54mm metal and plastic figures don't match up with 1/32nd scale models. Look at the variations that we have had in figures for years. Size and proportion vary in "54mm" and in "1/30 scale". To get true scale you need to go to 1/35th models and there is still a bit of variance in the figure proportions. So I guess we have to make our decisions about who and what we choose to buy. The only problem I have with making everything to "K&C size" is that there is a lot of variance between models. Andy doesn't hold his sculptors to a very tight scale on the vehicles. They just need to look OK with the figures.
One suggestion is that when minor differences occur in vehicles that are to be in a scene, place the larger one right up front, put the slightly smaller one a bit back, and possibly on a slight rise. Don't set them fender-to-fender or the difference will be really emphasized.
Gary B.
I was addressing only AFVs. The variation in figure sizes is even more complicated and diverse. At least with just the AFVs some sense of order and and a display strategy is not hard to do. But add figures into the mix, and the variance increases exponentially.
The other thing to keep in mind is that K&C and CS will sometimes oversize parts of a model for strength and durability while Figarti, HB TGM and FL do not seem to. This is noticeable in the 88s made by K&C vs Figarti and often in the gun barrels of comparable AFVs made by different companies. And Figarti and also shows scale variance among their own 1:30 models. I'm not sure if CS does too but I would expect that they have done so.
Terry