Harold...we'll let you move down to Texas...you'll fit right in here...it's warmer too...^&grin
Yes it's reasonable that you ask not to be around it and I have always tried to be courteous to people.What bugs me is the fanatics,usually ex smokers that think that smokers should have no place to go.Usually these type of people meet down at MacDonald's woofing down 2 or 3 Big Mac's and a pound of french fries with a 60oz soda to wash it down. I'm 58 years old and have smoked for 45 years and I'm not lying when I say I can outwork 90% of the younger "healthy" people.As far as the government goes it is one gigantic hypocrite.They talk about the dangers of smoking but it doesn't mind sucking up the tax dollars from it.Ban it if it's that bad.Now you might think that I am totally pro smoking but I would never recommend it to anyone but I'm sick of these people trying to tell everyone else how to live and what to do with your own body and not just with smoking.No matter how well you try to live the facts are your going to get old and your going to get sick.People need to quit worrying what everybody else is doing.I hear that worrying is not healthy either.I guess if everybody lived a clean healthy life and didn't get sick CVS wouldn't be in business.
Mark
As long as CVS keeps selling insulin I am good.
No 'likes' on this first class, top quality pun?
Maybe it was not as punny as you thought it was{sm4}
Now that was good!
You may wish to note I liked it. I did it to while the time whilst considering how to respond to the nice bradical man who said he sided with the Argentinians over the Falklands {sm4} I just dont want to throw a granada into the debate.
What a crazy world, a shop that sells groceries, drugs, booze, tobacco and AMMO ...madness. Glad I live in OZ where at least you can't just walk around the corner and buy Ammo!
Wayne.
You are typing on your ipad aren't you?
I never smoked cigarettes, but have COPD, perhaps caused by second hand smoke in USN when I stood watches in CIC. (Let's see if we can get the new guy sick by smoking cee-gars!) I can smell . . . and am bothered . . . by cigarette or cigar smoke 25 feet away. No fun . . . I assure you. And I'm afraid my thought towards the perpetuator are not exactly kindly. I'm an octogenerian and in otherwise good health . . . tell me how you're doing in 22 years.
Bosun Al
I never smoked cigarettes, but have COPD, perhaps caused by second hand smoke in USN when I stood watches in CIC. (Let's see if we can get the new guy sick by smoking cee-gars!) I can smell . . . and am bothered . . . by cigarette or cigar smoke 25 feet away. No fun . . . I assure you. And I'm afraid my thought towards the perpetuator are not exactly kindly. I'm an octogenerian and in otherwise good health . . . tell me how you're doing in 22 years.
Bosun Al
Yes. bradical was spelt correctly ...
You're so clever, but not too original. My nickname on my softball team was "b-rad", short for "b-radical". But I choose not to call names, however mildly, just because I might disagree with someone's opinion.
If it's radical to say that the decision is more corporate feel-good-ism than health concern, especially since they will continue to sell other products that are equally or more dangerous to health, especially alcohol, and if it's radical to express skepticism about scientific studies and reports from government agencies, given that everyone has an agenda, especially those who protest that they have no agenda, than to accept their content blindly, then so be it.
Prost!
b-rad
If CVS were selling Zyklon-B to the Nazis for use in the concentration camps and making a lot of money from it, would it be corporate feel-good-ism to discontinue that practice? Five million people die each year from smoking. That's roughly the equivalent of the holocaust - repeated every single year.
You're so clever, but not too original. My nickname on my softball team was "b-rad", short for "b-radical". But I choose not to call names, however mildly, just because I might disagree with someone's opinion.
If it's radical to say that the decision is more corporate feel-good-ism than health concern, especially since they will continue to sell other products that are equally or more dangerous to health, especially alcohol, and if it's radical to express skepticism about scientific studies and reports from government agencies, given that everyone has an agenda, especially those who protest that they have no agenda, than to accept their content blindly, then so be it.
Prost!
b-rad
my sympathies...I'm Type 2 myself...
For the record I am a non smoker who is amazed that in this day and age that younger people still take up the habit knowing what is known about it now.
Brett
I agree with Brett with this statement.My outlook on cigarettes is that people that don't want to be around that's fine and their right.I don't have a problem with that at all but don't try to take all my rights away to smoke if I choose to.With all the chemicals and toxins in foods,medicine,hygiene products and even the air don't blame cigarettes for every ailment.A lot of it is genetics that's why doctors ask about you family medical history.NY banned super size sodas so what do people do they get 2.The great new evil I've been told is sugar,give me a break.Have people not heard of the prohibition days? And you see what that brought.Do not try to regulate every aspect of someone's lifestyle.I have tried to quit smoking a few times just for the money saved it would be worth it to me.But if I ever do quit I won't try to ban it just because I quit.As for quitting for health reasons I suspect it's a little late for that.
Mark