Rob...
Thats exactly why I said I do not want censorship in any form. However. whether one likes the LAH stuff or not those that do should really be allowed to comment on the asthetic appeal of the sets without having to put up with the rather incessant and inflamatory comments. Its rather like one member when I joined was berated for constantly attacking K&C and, when I said he had a right to I was inundated with PM's and forum replies stating if I had been on as long as them then I too would be sick of it and trying to curtail his posts even, to the point of him being removed was action taken.
Now, what I mean by this is that should we take the last releases of the SA and the D&D set several posters stated how good the set was and that it was a change from parade etc figures and the next moment, a bombardment of abuse and links with deprtations, death camps and head shots.
Now, I have had infractions for commenting on what I see as ludicrous links with this from toy soldiers and, IMO find this to be as bad as someone spoiling a K&C thread with what was mentioned above but, some are allowed and some are not. It should be equal or, the people who constantly bring up links of reality with toy soldiers should, refrain if all they can do is inflame as thats exactly what it does. I note no threads are inflamed in relation to LAH etc from those who like the sets only the detractors.
Thats why I brought up the link with some accepting other SS units in their homes and swastika flags on AFV's as its acceptable to their moral code. Definately, should not be two rules as it seems there is. I believe its done for no other reason than to ensure the threads are closed or others are censored or infracted.
Mitch
Mitch