Great War Movies Vs The Last Decade's War Movies (2 Viewers)

arnhem44mad

1st Lieutenant
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Messages
4,663
Hey guys, just a wee discussion while we (I):p wait for the next season of reenacting and while we all (again I) wait for the new King and Country Market Garden Releases!:D

There are so many war movies of many different periods, which before the 21st Century were regarded as the 'Greats', now modern directors have their own creation of war movie, where generally the facts are wrong, the uniforms are off, however the acting is usually rather good.

Personally when I hear people talk of 'Great War Movies' I think of 'A Bridge Too Far', 'The Longest Day', 'Where Eagles Dare', 'Kelly's Heroes', 'The Dirty Dozen' etc....Movies which were made long before I was born, with classic actors such as Clint Eastwood, Henry Fonda, John Wayne, Sean Connery, Maximilian Schell, Telly Savalas, Robert Mitchum, Michael Caine, Lee Marvin, James Caan, Richard Burton etc....

However there are also modern greats such as Platoon, Black Hawk Down, Full Metal Jacket and a few others:)

War movies of the 20th Century usually, however not always, had specific facts which the movies were related to, such as Operation Market Garden, Operation Overlord, American Infantry in France, Allied spies infiltrating positions, and dressing up as Germans, A true tragic mission of modern times, the War in Vietnam!:D

Now in the 21st Century, war movies have dies out, which I find really sad as with modern day funding and actors there could be so many movies redone and updated to be more historically accurate, plus those movies could expand on bits missed or skipped in older films. Take 'A Bridge Too Far' For Example, through reenacting I have met and seen countless groups of British reenactors who choose to reenact the divisions which were in XXX Corps, and what's more interesting is that some of these groups even have vehicles, artillery, and British Sherman tanks!:eek:Their uniforms have been made to the specific standards of what the regiments they reenact have, as is their equipment, and most reenactors who I have spoken to have lots of knowledge on their chosen unit to reenact. Modern film makers who wanted to create a good movie based on certain events could benefit from the amount of reenactors who portray units involved in these certain events. There are also so many books which directors could consult, which past directors would not have been able to do.

Or take 'The Longest Day', our group, Normandy 44 reenact the 2nd Ranger Batallion which assaulted Point Du Hoc o the 6th of June 1944, and we use orginal equipment, so equipment which someone had used during the Second world war and chosen to sell, or which has gradually found its way into someone's hands who wants to sell it, or we use items which were never issued, for instance my friend has an orginal BC-1000 radio which when he got it was still in it's wooden crate, and sealed, dated 1945! We use orginal uniforms as best we can, as these days usualy the clothing is rather fragile and rips are common!:eek:So repro HBTs and m41s are allowed, however out helmets and boots and helmet liners are all original, we also know a couple of owners of original Higgins boats or Landing Crafts, so any directors who were wanting to know about this unit, could use us as consultation!:)

However modern directors do not use reenactment grous, or usually read up on or research the events which they want to create a film about, which I believe to be sort of ignorance, as they do have the opportunity to do this, and all you have to do is search on google for 2nd ranger battalion and one of the first reults is a reenactment group.

In the last 10 years the only war movie I can think of which did portray events in a true form, was 'Saving Private Ryan', however personally I find it a shame that there is only about 10-15 minutes spent on the beach landings part of the movie:(I think so much more could have been done here, but what was included in the movie is amazing!

I think 'Saving Private Ryan' was the last ever movie which can be even classified as a 'War Movie' which is a disappointment, as I do not believe that we will see any other war movies which will be basedon fact instead of random movies which are totally historically inacurrate, for instance: The Last Drop' 'Inglorious Basterds'....both off topic and what I personally found to be complete let downs!:(:confused:

Does anyone else feel that it is a shame that we don't see any great war movies these days, or am I alone in this feeling?
 
I don't know about no good modern war movies. The ones that were made just don't seem to get the notice that they deserve. I think that The Great Raid is an awesome war movie in which the director did the soldiers involved justice. I also thought that "To End All Wars" was well done but didn't get the attention that it deserved either.
I didn't get to go, but I had friends that were extras in Gettysburg. I know that Directors are searching for a certain look and in the case of a lot of Civil War Re-enactors, There are quite a few that don't look like 1860s soldiers inured to hardships.
I would REALLY like to see some more well done war movies though!
 
What a well thought out and reasoned post Scott. I think you raise a number of good points. In answer to your question, I am sure you are not alone. Sadly it is almost as bad for other movie genres. As to war movies, I agree with you about the relative scarity of quality contemporary examples. Inglorious Bastards was just strange for example. Unless Spielberg and Hanks commit themselves to some new projects in the area, there seems little hope we will see anything like the older classics you mentioned any time soon. I don't mean to come accross as a generationist but the lastest crop of movie producers, director and writers is quite underwhelming to me. Yes there are a few shinning exceptions but in general those are done by older film makers. And then even the great film makers are turning in the pitiful quick cut, CGI driven, preposterous action bloated mush like Transformers and Inception. Sometimes I wonder what todays directors would do without automatic weapons on full auto with bottomless magazines, endless explosions and flipping vehicles. There are some really good actors today; too bad their talents are so often wasted.:mad:
 
I think 'Saving Private Ryan' was the last ever movie which can be even classified as a 'War Movie'

Going to have to disagree with you on this Scott, I don't think you can label 'SPR' as the last war film in the past decade. Though 'Band of Brothers' and 'The Pacific' are miniseries, I believe the accurately depict war at its worst, the effects they have on the men that fight in them, these in my book qualify as "war films". 'We Were Soldiers' and 'Flags of our Fathers', though alot of the time in these films is devoted to the homefront, we forget the private "battles" these men and their families fight. I'd suggest the HBO film, "Taking Chance" if you want the best glimpse into the homefront.

Best Regards,
Jake
 
Hey guys, just a wee discussion while we (I):p wait for the next season of reenacting and while we all (again I) wait for the new King and Country Market Garden Releases!:D

There are so many war movies of many different periods, which before the 21st Century were regarded as the 'Greats', now modern directors have their own creation of war movie, where generally the facts are wrong, the uniforms are off, however the acting is usually rather good.

Personally when I hear people talk of 'Great War Movies' I think of 'A Bridge Too Far', 'The Longest Day', 'Where Eagles Dare', 'Kelly's Heroes', 'The Dirty Dozen' etc....Movies which were made long before I was born, with classic actors such as Clint Eastwood, Henry Fonda, John Wayne, Sean Connery, Maximilian Schell, Telly Savalas, Robert Mitchum, Michael Caine, Lee Marvin, James Caan, Richard Burton etc....

However there are also modern greats such as Platoon, Black Hawk Down, Full Metal Jacket and a few others:)

War movies of the 20th Century usually, however not always, had specific facts which the movies were related to, such as Operation Market Garden, Operation Overlord, American Infantry in France, Allied spies infiltrating positions, and dressing up as Germans, A true tragic mission of modern times, the War in Vietnam!:D

Now in the 21st Century, war movies have dies out, which I find really sad as with modern day funding and actors there could be so many movies redone and updated to be more historically accurate, plus those movies could expand on bits missed or skipped in older films. Take 'A Bridge Too Far' For Example, through reenacting I have met and seen countless groups of British reenactors who choose to reenact the divisions which were in XXX Corps, and what's more interesting is that some of these groups even have vehicles, artillery, and British Sherman tanks!:eek:Their uniforms have been made to the specific standards of what the regiments they reenact have, as is their equipment, and most reenactors who I have spoken to have lots of knowledge on their chosen unit to reenact. Modern film makers who wanted to create a good movie based on certain events could benefit from the amount of reenactors who portray units involved in these certain events. There are also so many books which directors could consult, which past directors would not have been able to do.

Or take 'The Longest Day', our group, Normandy 44 reenact the 2nd Ranger Batallion which assaulted Point Du Hoc o the 6th of June 1944, and we use orginal equipment, so equipment which someone had used during the Second world war and chosen to sell, or which has gradually found its way into someone's hands who wants to sell it, or we use items which were never issued, for instance my friend has an orginal BC-1000 radio which when he got it was still in it's wooden crate, and sealed, dated 1945! We use orginal uniforms as best we can, as these days usualy the clothing is rather fragile and rips are common!:eek:So repro HBTs and m41s are allowed, however out helmets and boots and helmet liners are all original, we also know a couple of owners of original Higgins boats or Landing Crafts, so any directors who were wanting to know about this unit, could use us as consultation!:)

However modern directors do not use reenactment grous, or usually read up on or research the events which they want to create a film about, which I believe to be sort of ignorance, as they do have the opportunity to do this, and all you have to do is search on google for 2nd ranger battalion and one of the first reults is a reenactment group.

In the last 10 years the only war movie I can think of which did portray events in a true form, was 'Saving Private Ryan', however personally I find it a shame that there is only about 10-15 minutes spent on the beach landings part of the movie:(I think so much more could have been done here, but what was included in the movie is amazing!

I think 'Saving Private Ryan' was the last ever movie which can be even classified as a 'War Movie' which is a disappointment, as I do not believe that we will see any other war movies which will be basedon fact instead of random movies which are totally historically inacurrate, for instance: The Last Drop' 'Inglorious Basterds'....both off topic and what I personally found to be complete let downs!:(:confused:

Does anyone else feel that it is a shame that we don't see any great war movies these days, or am I alone in this feeling?

Well I would check out these two great new war films for a start Max Manus - Man Of War + Flame And Citron both based on true facts
 
Going to have to disagree with you on this Scott, I don't think you can label 'SPR' as the last war film in the past decade. Though 'Band of Brothers' and 'The Pacific' are miniseries, I believe the accurately depict war at its worst, the effects they have on the men that fight in them, these in my book qualify as "war films". 'We Were Soldiers' and 'Flags of our Fathers', though alot of the time in these films is devoted to the homefront, we forget the private "battles" these men and their families fight. I'd suggest the HBO film, "Taking Chance" if you want the best glimpse into the homefront.

Best Regards,
Jake

I never included band of brothers and the pacific because of the fact that they are not films mate!:) We were soldiers is a great movie also!:)I overlooked that one!
 
What a well thought out and reasoned post Scott. I think you raise a number of good points. In answer to your question, I am sure you are not alone. Sadly it is almost as bad for other movie genres. As to war movies, I agree with you about the relative scarity of quality contemporary examples. Inglorious Bastards was just strange for example. Unless Spielberg and Hanks commit themselves to some new projects in the area, there seems little hope we will see anything like the older classics you mentioned any time soon. I don't mean to come accross as a generationist but the lastest crop of movie producers, director and writers is quite underwhelming to me. Yes there are a few shinning exceptions but in general those are done by older film makers. And then even the great film makers are turning in the pitiful quick cut, CGI driven, preposterous action bloated mush like Transformers and Inception. Sometimes I wonder what todays directors would do without automatic weapons on full auto with bottomless magazines, endless explosions and flipping vehicles. There are some really good actors today; too bad their talents are so often wasted.:mad:

In all the objections, I forgot to say mate, thanks a lot for your comments on the post!:D:cool:

Scott
 
In the last 10 years the only war movie I can think of which did portray events in a true form, was 'Saving Private Ryan', however personally I find it a shame that there is only about 10-15 minutes spent on the beach landings part of the movie:(I think so much more could have been done here, but what was included in the movie is amazing!

I think 'Saving Private Ryan' was the last ever movie which can be even classified as a 'War Movie' which is a disappointment,

What about the movie that you quote as your signature?? If memory serves, wasn't that LtCol (later LTG) Hal Moore?? Didn't that come out after SPR? And, after all, wasn't SPR historical fiction?? :)

Stick with the reenacting- I know several reenactor companies that have come around to Gettysburg and use reenactors for info, extras etc. Hopefully you will get a shot at it.

Blackhawk Down was an excellent flick and the actors did some Ranger'n to get ready for the film but there were a lot of innaccuracies as well- where were the SEALs for example??

So long as there are men who love gory death scenes, desperate battles and over the top drama and comraderie, there will be war flicks. :D
 
Blackhawk Down was an excellent flick and the actors did some Ranger'n to get ready for the film but there were a lot of innaccuracies as well- where were the SEALs for example??

I've gotta agree with you on this one Chris. After reading the book I was shocked by the amount of innaccuracies in the movie, still I felt the movie really captured the heroism of the pilots, D-boys, Rangers, and other members of the task force on that fateful October day.:) Now don't get me started on 'Jarhead'!;)

Cheers!
Jake
 
Thought "Black Hawk Down", despite the differences from the book, was a much better movie than "We Were Soldiers". The book by Moore was fantastic, the movie, not so much. Never could get over the appearence of the foliage as it looked that they went into the California hills to film it. Thought BHD to be a much more realistic film. -- Al
 
Thought "Black Hawk Down", despite the differences from the book, was a much better movie than "We Were Soldiers". The book by Moore was fantastic, the movie, not so much. Never could get over the appearence of the foliage as it looked that they went into the California hills to film it. Thought BHD to be a much more realistic film. -- Al

They did go through the the California hills for We Were Soldiers. It was at Camp Roberts (A National Guard training area) or Hunter Liggett which is next door. I wandered through those hills quite a bit while I was in the Reserves. A California Army National Guard Ch-47 even makes an appearance at the end of the movie.
 
They did go through the the California hills for We Were Soldiers. It was at Camp Roberts (A National Guard training area) or Hunter Liggett which is next door. I wandered through those hills quite a bit while I was in the Reserves. A California Army National Guard Ch-47 even makes an appearance at the end of the movie.
Thanks for the confirmation. It looked like the good ol' USA. Of course they were only following John Wayne's lead, as he filmed "The Green Berets" in North Carolina, (I guess the actual war would have prevented any real location useage). -- Al
 
Thanks for the confirmation. It looked like the good ol' USA. Of course they were only following John Wayne's lead, as he filmed "The Green Berets" in North Carolina, (I guess the actual war would have prevented any real location useage). -- Al

Just a "gee wiz fact, They filmed a lot of the Green Berets around Fort Benning Ga. I heard that one of the deals that the production company made with Army was that the sets would be left in place for training. One of my brothers went through helicopter school at Fort Rucker, Ala. a few years after the movie was made.
He told me about flying into those Landing Zones for training. The river that the NVA is crossing when the Huey flies over, is the Chattahoochie, according to him. I wonder what Sherman and Johnston would have thought to have a Huey fly over them while they were crossing that river.
 
The Australians are very good at accurate war films and TV mini series. One of the best films is "The Lighthorsemen" in which I liked the correct use of hand signals for mounted troops along with the correct kit and adherence to the true facts. For TV miniseries "Anzacs" takes a lot of beating.
 
Just a "gee wiz fact, They filmed a lot of the Green Berets around Fort Benning Ga. I heard that one of the deals that the production company made with Army was that the sets would be left in place for training. One of my brothers went through helicopter school at Fort Rucker, Ala. a few years after the movie was made.
He told me about flying into those Landing Zones for training. The river that the NVA is crossing when the Huey flies over, is the Chattahoochie, according to him. I wonder what Sherman and Johnston would have thought to have a Huey fly over them while they were crossing that river.
Thanks for the memory jog. I knew it was Benning in Georgia, don't know why it came out NC. Just getting old.:eek: -- Al
 
I have just watched ''beneath Hill 60'' based on Aussie diggers and that for me was a very good war film. Graphic enough to get over the fact it was war without being over the top but, packed with a sense of what it must have been like for them in that carnage and situation. One of the best I have seen recently
Mitch
 
The dynamics for making movies have changed. Now they cost hundreds of millions to make. So the Hollywood execs require they have a big name star, a romance angle, and they generally have an anti-war theme. Never get the rock'em sock'em films from the 40's again. Made on shoe string budgets with mostly fighting scenes. Same problem exists for the western genre. They used to make tons of entertaining films. Now they have to be message films if westerns get made. And they are usually bad to boot.
 
The dynamics for making movies have changed. Now they cost hundreds of millions to make. So the Hollywood execs require they have a big name star, a romance angle, and they generally have an anti-war theme.

Disagree here to some extent- no romance angle in SPR or Blackhawk. Though I agree the costs associated with this stuff makes it difficult to sell.

We were soldier had somewhat of a romance angle though I'd like to think it showed more of the hardships on the homefront for the families, which I fully appreciate- being an army brat and all. To me, some of the most riveting/dramatic scenes were when Mrs. Moore was walking the telegrams to the wives.

I think war films have done a really really good job of taking the "Hollywood glorification" out of war flicks and showing more of what it is really like.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top