OzDigger
Colonel
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 8,295
The article confirms my assertion that death and injury from ionizing radiation was minimal compared to other causes from both bombs.
It is indisputable that exposure to radiation at H & N led to cancer (by causing mutation in DNA of living cells). The most deadly effect that victims of H & N suffered was leukemia, which appeared between two and six years after the attacks. Other cancers showed up more than 10 years after the attacks. In addition, children of women who were pregnant at the time of the attacks had issues such as slightly larger heads, mental problems and other problems. Fortunately, children conceived after the bombings did not, as a rule, suffer from these problems. So, there is a significant difference between the types of weapons.
See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907953/, for example.