Hello all;
For example I "could" build a desert dio with Erwin surrendering to Monty (or being captured). Maybe, have Rommel arriving in to Monty's HQ camp in his HORCH while Monty stands besides his Crusaders and Vickers along side Stirling (EA017) and F.M Alexander (EA011).
I'm not sure if my diorama displayed below is historically accurate but I think it looks pretty cool....
Good luck with your diorama,
Patrick
I'm not sure if my diorama displayed below is historically accurate but I think it looks pretty cool. As previously stated it is very hard to make a diorama 100% historically accurate. But your diorama can represent a bigger meaning. For instance my diorama represents Rommel and Monty having diplomatic talks on the brink of battle. Might not be 100% historically accurate but the diorama makes your mind wander. There is also 2 Rommels in my diorama. Whats up with that??????? I would conclude it is totally up to you what you want to do with your diorama. After all it is your diorama.
Good luck with your diorama,
Patrick
Good show Patrick. Two Rommels, now that would have given the Allies something to think about (and maybe gotten rid of the little Corporal and ended the war soonerI'm not sure if my diorama displayed below is historically accurate but I think it looks pretty cool. As previously stated it is very hard to make a diorama 100% historically accurate. But your diorama can represent a bigger meaning. For instance my diorama represents Rommel and Monty having diplomatic talks on the brink of battle. Might not be 100% historically accurate but the diorama makes your mind wander. There is also 2 Rommels in my diorama. Whats up with that??????? I would conclude it is totally up to you what you want to do with your diorama. After all it is your diorama.
Good luck with your diorama,
Patrick
It is called " The Theater of the Mind." Hollywood do it and they do it good. Remember the movie U505? It portrayed the event as a U.S. Navy effort but the historical fact is...it was the British Navy. Or, how about Pocohantas? In the movie she fell in love with Captgain Smith, but the historical truth is it was the British Governor at Wiiliamsburg Virginia whom she later married. An there are many more fictional stories depicted within the context of an actual historical event...so enjoy and let those creative juices and imagination flow. It is good for the soul!
N-P
Absolutely right N-P. It is indeed good for the soul. Just a minor point of correction. The submarine movie you note was U571, which in part was based on the events surrounding the HMS Bulldog, which first captured a naval Enigma machine, from U-110 in the North Atlantic May 1941, before the United States entered the war. There were some 15 captures of Naval Enigma material during World War II, all but two by the British. The Canadians captured U-774; interestingly the U.S. Navy seized the U-505 you referenced in June 1944.It is called " The Theater of the Mind." Hollywood do it and they do it good. Remember the movie U505? It portrayed the event as a U.S. Navy effort but the historical fact is...it was the British Navy. Or, how about Pocohantas? In the movie she fell in love with Captgain Smith, but the historical truth is it was the British Governor at Wiiliamsburg Virginia whom she later married. An there are many more fictional stories depicted within the context of an actual historical event...so enjoy and let those creative juices and imagination flow. It is good for the soul!
N-P
Absolutely right N-P. It is indeed good for the soul. Just a minor point of correction. The submarine movie you note was U571, which in part was based on the events surrounding the HMS Bulldog, which first captured a naval Enigma machine, from U-110 in the North Atlantic May 1941, before the United States entered the war. There were some 15 captures of Naval Enigma material during World War II, all but two by the British. The Canadians captured U-774; interestingly the U.S. Navy seized the U-505 you referenced in June 1944.
Of course, the film U571 caused some of our British cousins to have a kitten; even leading Tony Blair to criticize the distortion and Bill Clinton to defend it. To me, the juxtoposition was simple creative license and David Balme, the British Naval officer who led the boarding party aboard the U-110, called it "a great film" and correctly observed that the movie would not have been financially viable without being Americanised. In fact, even with a British crew, the U571 story was much different than the real U110 story. As oft said here, popular films are never to be confused with documentaries.Good example of bending history though.