KC has fallen behind with value and quality (1 Viewer)

Matt is right about Tryfon (I think his name is Trevor); he's a bomb tosser and his pattern is predictable. Since he is predictable, I fail to see the point in getting excised about his comments.
 
The older KC range were more dynamic, great battle poses, and value for money

now expensive, and pretty boring figures, I purchased the Greeks, no good, some had problem with shape and size like AG011, the bases are smaller, so fall over on even thing grass display mats

and shields are very shiny

Thomus Gunn has produced great quality and value for money items, shame KC does not go back to its roots even the new romans standard boring poses, no dynamic battle poses or unique

Thanks for your input. Hope you feel better now. jb
 
I happen to really like K&C and Andy is the best "brand ambassador" out there. I think the quality has been improving year after year. I also have no problem discussing it if someone disagrees. We all collect what we like and don't all like the same things.
However, to come in like a dive bomber and say, these things suck, and then pull up and bug out does no one any good. It doesn't make for good discussion and doesn't help a manufacturer who may like hearing criticism to make changes if they see fit.
I will never pile on someone who disagrees, but you must make some points to be discussed. :salute::
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top