MichaelRutherford
Private 2
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 74
I like the Polish invasion series. I have been waiting for this series for a long time. The Fallschirmjager soldiers dont look very good in my opinion. They lack detail.
Yes I have limited funds and space too, but I'll be picking up the remaining Ramcke troops, as the desert is my main interest area.
What do you have concerns over with these AK troops, be interested to hear ?
They look like nice figures, very plain, as someone else posted there is a lot of the normal 'detail' missing from the figures. Had a look at the figures and tried to think why I had thoughts on the figures and a couple of the poses just do not look natural, the standing and kneeing firing for example, I do not know enough about the uniforms but the helmets do not look right, not historically, but just do not seem to sit right on the heads. I saw the first group at the London show and was not impressed, they just did not have the wow factor, but I did buy some other K & C figures
Hi Mr. W,
I truly wish I could please all of the people all of the time with everything we produce... But alas that will never happen and, over the years, I have learned that if you can please some of the people some of the time... then at least you've made some collectors happy...and you live and work with that.
Best wishes and happy collecting,
Andy.
They look like nice figures, very plain, as someone else posted there is a lot of the normal 'detail' missing from the figures. Had a look at the figures and tried to think why I had thoughts on the figures and a couple of the poses just do not look natural, the standing and kneeing firing for example, I do not know enough about the uniforms but the helmets do not look right, not historically, but just do not seem to sit right on the heads. I saw the first group at the London show and was not impressed, they just did not have the wow factor, but I did buy some other K & C figures.
They look like nice figures, very plain, as someone else posted there is a lot of the normal 'detail' missing from the figures. Had a look at the figures and tried to think why I had thoughts on the figures and a couple of the poses just do not look natural, the standing and kneeing firing for example, I do not know enough about the uniforms but the helmets do not look right, not historically, but just do not seem to sit right on the heads. I saw the first group at the London show and was not impressed, they just did not have the wow factor, but I did buy some other K & C figures
Hi Mr. W,
I truly wish I could please all of the people all of the time with everything we produce... But alas that will never happen and, over the years, I have learned that if you can please some of the people some of the time... then at least you've made some collectors happy...and you live and work with that.
Best wishes and happy collecting,
Andy.
Andy , You and your company make many nice products. Just keep in mind that most of your customers are also very into history, in which detail is a part of. A lot of the collectors here on this forum are very knowledgeable and point out things that are "off". It's not necessarily attacks on you or your company. Cheers,Mike
Andy , You and your company make many nice products. Just keep in mind that most of your customers are also very into history, in which detail is a part of. A lot of the collectors here on this forum are very knowledgeable and point out things that are "off". It's not necessarily attacks on you or your company. Cheers,Mike
I don’t know that you can stand behind the claim that “Most” KandC customers are “very into history”. Is that based on empirical evidence of just your sense? Though I’m not quite sure how you would define it. Clearly SOME collectors are “into history”. Including probably yourself? That’s fine, but anecdotes and personal experiences are not necessarily valid for making sweeping generalizations.
Moreever, one can appreciate history and still recognize that toy soldiers will always have an artistic and even playful component. I certainly do. How much you like / tolerate — and will pay for — is of course a personal decision. As always Free Market / Demand is the most effective way of driving what the makers make / supply.
I don’t know that you can stand behind the claim that “Most” KandC customers are “very into history”. Is that based on empirical evidence of just your sense? Though I’m not quite sure how you would define it. Clearly SOME collectors are “into history”. Including probably yourself? That’s fine, but anecdotes and personal experiences are not necessarily valid for making sweeping generalizations.
Moreever, one can appreciate history and still recognize that toy soldiers will always have an artistic and even playful component. I certainly do. How much you like / tolerate — and will pay for — is of course a personal decision. As always Free Market / Demand is the most effective way of driving what the makers make / supply.
Hi Rutledge, I just thought that by definition of collecting historical miniatures that one would have some type of interest in history. That's all I meant. I have no scientific or court of law proof behind it,just a common sense kind of thought. Cheers,Mike
They look like nice figures, very plain, as someone else posted there is a lot of the normal 'detail' missing from the figures. Had a look at the figures and tried to think why I had thoughts on the figures and a couple of the poses just do not look natural, the standing and kneeing firing for example, I do not know enough about the uniforms but the helmets do not look right, not historically, but just do not seem to sit right on the heads. I saw the first group at the London show and was not impressed, they just did not have the wow factor, but I did buy some other K & C figures
Hi Mr. W,
I truly wish I could please all of the people all of the time with everything we produce... But alas that will never happen and, over the years, I have learned that if you can please some of the people some of the time... then at least you've made some collectors happy...and you live and work with that.
Best wishes and happy collecting,
Andy.
Thanks for the reply, if you read some of my previous posts I am very impressed with your figures and have been complimentary. I renewed my TS insurance last month and it is up to £80,000 to replace, most of which are K & C. However with any company that produces such a diverse range there are some figures which appeal and some which do not.
I don’t know that you can stand behind the claim that “Most” KandC customers are “very into history”. Is that based on empirical evidence of just your sense? Though I’m not quite sure how you would define it. Clearly SOME collectors are “into history”. Including probably yourself? That’s fine, but anecdotes and personal experiences are not necessarily valid for making sweeping generalizations.
Hi Rutledge, I just thought that by definition of collecting historical miniatures that one would have some type of interest in history. That's all I meant. I have no scientific or court of law proof behind it,just a common sense kind of thought. Cheers,Mike
Andy , You and your company make many nice products. Just keep in mind that most of your customers are also very into history, in which detail is a part of. A lot of the collectors here on this forum are very knowledgeable and point out things that are "off". It's not necessarily attacks on you or your company. Cheers,Mike
Well, it must be said that historically the Ramcke figures are pretty much spot on as far as uniforms and equipment go.
The helmet bolts are in the wrong places for an m38 and there were no tan chinstraps, but these are miniscule issues overall.
Another great assortment Andy. The ladies will be travelling down under as will be the iconic Marine stretcher team. The Poland barrier breakers are quite unusal and to be considered. Robin.
Hi, Steve,
First off, I also want to state that I am in NO WAY an expert on WWII USMC Pacific uniforms, but I will have to respectfully disagree with you on the shirt question. Below is just one search which shows USMC during WWII.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=US+Marines+WW2+in+Color&FORM=RESTAB
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=US+Marines+WW2+Okinawa&FORM=IRIBIP
While I agree that there were some cases after long days (and nights) of fighting, as well as the terrible conditions of the jungle or island heat and humidity, there was no breakdown in dress.
Hello Larry
I believe the original question to which i answered was "Could the new release of the USMC stretcher party be converted for the European Theatre) My answer in my humble opinion was NO not really...It is still No not really!!!.
The USMC uniform as i stated was very different in many details to his US. Army counterpart, and the profile of a Marine after days/weeks in combat was also very different and could never.(almost never) be mistaken as to where the soldier was in combat.
I used the word sloppy, but i also stated that this was due to the combat situation ie, Heat, Humidity, and never suggested a breakdown-(your words) of Discipline-Moraal-Integrity....No it was a sensible adaptation to the land and circumstances in which they were fighting.
The US. Army G.I. in Europe fought in a completely different enviroment where it more often than not cool or just plain..COLD!! so he had a much more buttoned-up appearence.
I still think that the KC USMC stretcher party with their loose shirts would look out of place in a Normandy street!!!!!!.
Remember and Respect
Steve
I have a blasphemous question: is the Marine uniform similar enough to the Army uniform of the period that the set could be repainted to portray an Army stretcher party? I am an Army medical officer and there is a real lack of four-man stretcher sets, so I would love to have someone convert the stretcher and some of the other medical sets to represent my unit.
Hi maybe this helps! I have repaint this figure from IWJ021 from Marine to G.I set a few years ago.
View attachment 230581
View attachment 230582
View attachment 230583
have a nice weekend
Harrie
Hi, Steve,
First off, I also want to state that I am in NO WAY an expert on WWII USMC Pacific uniforms, but I will have to respectfully disagree with you on the shirt question. Below is just one search which shows USMC during WWII.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=US+Marines+WW2+in+Color&FORM=RESTAB
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=US+Marines+WW2+Okinawa&FORM=IRIBIP
While I agree that there were some cases after long days (and nights) of fighting, as well as the terrible conditions of the jungle or island heat and humidity, there was no breakdown in dress.
Hello Larry
I believe the original question to which i answered was "Could the new release of the USMC stretcher party be converted for the European Theatre) My answer in my humble opinion was NO not really...It is still No not really!!!.
The USMC uniform as i stated was very different in many details to his US. Army counterpart, and the profile of a Marine after days/weeks in combat was also very different and could never.(almost never) be mistaken as to where the soldier was in combat.
I used the word sloppy, but i also stated that this was due to the combat situation ie, Heat, Humidity, and never suggested a breakdown-(your words) of Discipline-Moraal-Integrity....No it was a sensible adaptation to the land and circumstances in which they were fighting.
The US. Army G.I. in Europe fought in a completely different enviroment where it more often than not cool or just plain..COLD!! so he had a much more buttoned-up appearence.
I still think that the KC USMC stretcher party with their loose shirts would look out of place in a Normandy street!!!!!!.
Remember and Respect
Steve
Morning, Steve,
My apologies if I mistook the original question.
You are correct; the question was more direct towards one item (the USMC stretcher set) , I misread it to mean all USMC soldiers looked
disheveled and sloppy all the time .....ooooooooppssss .:redface2:
And yes the stretcher set, as-is, it would appear very out of place, but it looks like Harrie has come to the rescue with a possible option.
But then again, I wouldn't have Harrie's skill for conversion.
If I tried that, the figures might be suitable for a "Walking Dead Diorama" ...{sm2}
--- LaRRy
Morning, Steve,
My apologies if I mistook the original question.
You are correct; the question was more direct towards one item (the USMC stretcher set) , I misread it to mean all USMC soldiers looked
disheveled and sloppy all the time .....ooooooooppssss .:redface2:
And yes the stretcher set, as-is, it would appear very out of place, but it looks like Harrie has come to the rescue with a possible option.
But then again, I wouldn't have Harrie's skill for conversion.
If I tried that, the figures might be suitable for a "Walking Dead Diorama" ...{sm2}
--- LaRRy
Hello Larry
No problems friend....it takes a man to stand up and apologise when he is out of line!!....apologie accepted.
Remember and Respect
Steve