Rutledge
Master Sergeant
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2006
- Messages
- 1,222
Meanwhile, 50 years later, the “mighty” Russian military was chased out of Afghanistan with its tail between its legs, in shame and disgrace, driven out by a rag tag army of goat herders working part time as Mujahideen. A pathetic display exhibiting an utter lack of military prowess by the USSR, ultimately resulting in its collapse as a failed nation state. What an embarrassing humiliation, as well as indictment, of a corrupt, cowardly and incompetent Russian culture. Note: America enjoyed supplying stinger missiles to help out the Afghan peasant army. At least 333 Russian helicopters and 118 jets were destroyed by a guerrilla force that essentially had no Air power. Can you imagine if they did? Good lord, what a slaughter it would have been. One almost feels sorry for the Russian conscripts sent in to Afghanistan as so much cannon fodder. But, as in WWII, Russian generals don’t give two ***** about their own casualty counts. “Cheers” Tank! lolOnce again about the Kursk Bulge Battle.The German Army before the beginning of the Kursk Bulge Battle had:Just before the beggining of the Battle of Kursk, the German tank divisions participating in the offensive had a total of 2173 tanks of all modifications.This tank forces were iincluding flamethrower tanks (41), commander tanks (119) and light tanks (119) plus there were at least 90 Tigers and 200 Panthers The infantry divisions had at least 1000 assault self-propelled guns. All these tanks and assault self-propelled guns in terms of combat qualities were vastly exceeded the Soviet tanks and self-propelled guns. Especially the heavy Tigers, Panthers and the long-barrel modifications of the Pz IV. They could destroy the medium T 34 tanks from a distance of 1000m to 2000m. On the other side the Soviet 76mm anti-tank artillery could reliably destroy the German tanks of the latest modifications from a distance no more than 400m or even less.So to make it short the reliably distance of an armour penetration the opposing tanks for the T-34 was at least twice less then for the German tanks.The Red Army before the beginning of the Kursk Bulge Battle had:Central Front (2nd Tank Army, 129th Tank Brigade, separate tank regiments (five), 9th Tank Corps, 13th, 70th, 60th and 65th Armies):KV-1 heavy tanks - 70 tanksMedium tanks T 34 and M3 "General Lee" - 864 tanksT 70 and T 60 light tanks - 647 tanksIn addition there were SU-152 - 25 pieces, SU-122 - 32 pieces and 34 SU-76 - 34 pieces.Voronezh Front. (1st Tank Army, 10th Tank Corps, 5th Guards Tank Corps, 86th, 180th and 190th Separate Tank Brigades, 3 Separate Tank Regiments, Two Separate Breakthrough Tank Regiments and the 1461st Self-Propelled artillery regiment.)KV-1 - 105 heavy tanksMedium tanks T-34 - 1109 tanksLight T-70 and T-60 - 463 tanks 24 SU-122 - 24 pcs and SU-76 - 33 pcs.Please note: The Army reserve - the 5th Guards Tank Army (about 450 tanks), what were in the counterattack near Prokhorovka.Thus, we can see that by the beginning of the Battle of Kursk USSR troops had no noticeable superiority in tanks - neither quantity, nor quality. German - 3173 tanks and assault self-propelled guns. Red Army - 3406 tanks and self-propelled guns plus 450 tanks reserve.The epic “wall to wall” battle on July 12 near Prokhorovka in reality was a series of counter-battles separated in time at a front 32–35 km long. This situation arose as a result of almost simultaneous offensive operations on both sides. The Germans made the first move - on June 11, they struck in the direction of Prokhorovka and Oboyan, partially disrupting the preparation of the Red Army counteroffensive.5th Guards the tank army, operating in a 17–19 km long band, together with attached units at the beginning of the battle, numbered from 680 to 720 tanks and self-propelled guns, and the advancing German group was up to 540 tanks and self-propelled guns. The Rotmistrov’s tank army (5th Guards Tank Army) lost up to 60% of its tanks in the tank battles on July 12. The Red Army counteroffensive failed but the Germans did not achieve their goals either.In view of the fact that the actions of the 5th Guards Tank Army disrupted the German attack on Kursk, these operations were later considered successful. Western historians repeat that German troops retreated from the Kursk Bulge only because they had to be transferred to Italy due the Allies landing in Sicily. The landing in Sicily took place at about the same time - from July 9 to August 17. The 16th panzer division, the 26th panzer divisions and the “German Goering” division, fought with the Allies in Italy in September 1943. These panzer divisions did not participate in the Battle of Kursk and weren’t on the Eastern Front (16th panzer division was formed again).Hitler did not transfer any troops “from Kursk” to Italy.That is a myth. (regards to Mirof)Cheers.Tank
Last edited: